Guide to the Cox Proportional Hazards model

James Hickey

2026-07-13

gbm supports boosted Cox proportional hazards models for survival data. The package can handle two types of survival response: right-censored and counting-process Surv objects. Both can be created with the Surv function from the survival package.

Setting up data and the distribution object

Right-censored survival data consist of a time-to-event value and an event indicator: 0 if no event has occurred and 1 if the event has occurred. Counting-process survival data contain start and stop times along with an event indicator for the interval. Data may be organized into strata, which should be passed to gbm_dist when creating the CoxPHGBMDist object; see the “Model Specific Parameters” vignette for more details. The dataset used here is provided by the survival package.

## Load package
require(survival)

# get datasets
right_cens <- cgd[cgd$enum==1, ]
start_stop <- cgd

# Set up GBMDist objects
right_cens_dist <- gbm_dist("CoxPH", strata=right_cens$hos.cat)
start_stop_dist <- gbm_dist("CoxPH", strata=start_stop$hos.cat)

Creating a boosted model

To create the boosted model, define the training parameters and call gbmt. In this example, the data have observation IDs, so it is necessary to create specific GBMTrainParams objects rather than relying on the defaults.

# Set-up training parameters
params_right_cens <- training_params(num_trees = 2000, interaction_depth = 3, 
                                     id=right_cens$id,
                                     num_train=round(0.5 * length(unique(right_cens$id))) )
params_start_stop <- training_params(num_trees = 2000, interaction_depth = 3, 
                                     id=start_stop$id,
                                     num_train=round(0.5 * length(unique(start_stop$id))) )

# Call to gbmt
fit_right_cens <- gbmt(Surv(tstop, status)~ age + sex + inherit +
                     steroids + propylac, data=right_cens, 
                     distribution = right_cens_dist,
                     train_params = params_right_cens, cv_folds=10,
                     keep_gbm_data = TRUE)
fit_start_stop <- gbmt(Surv(tstart, tstop, status)~ age + sex + inherit +
                     steroids + propylac, data=start_stop, 
                     distribution = start_stop_dist,
                     train_params = params_start_stop, cv_folds=10, 
                     keep_gbm_data = TRUE)

# Plot performance
best_iter_right <- gbmt_performance(fit_right_cens, method='test')
best_iter_stop_start <- gbmt_performance(fit_start_stop, method='test')

Strata Updates

During fitting, the original strata vector is updated as follows. When the data are split into training and validation sets, the strata vector is also split. The strata vector is then updated to represent the cumulative count of observations in each stratum for the training and validation sets. The vector is padded with NAs so it has the same length as the original strata vector and so that the validation-set cumulative strata sums are separated from the training-set strata counts by the appropriate amount.

The original strata vector is stored within the GBMFit object and can be accessed as follows: fit$distribution$original_strata_id. The data in the original_strata_id field is used to recreate the correct strata when performing additional iterations using gbm_more.

Role of additional parameters in GBMDist

ties and prior_node_coeff_var

The ties and prior_node_coeff_var parameters may also be specified on construction of the CoxPHGBMDist object. The former is a string specifying the method by which the algorithm deals with tied event times. This may be set to either “breslow” or “efron” depending on your preference, with the latter being the default. The role of the prior_node_coeff_var parameter is slightly more subtle and complex. When fitting a boosted tree, the optimal predictions of the terminal nodes must be set. These predictions determine the predictions made by the GBMFit object. The role of prior_node_coeff_var is to ensure that the predictions are finite and it does this by acting as a regularization for the terminal node predictions. It should be a finite positive double and is by default set to a 1000. An exact description of its role in the underlying algorithm is described in the next section.

# Example using Breslow and Efron tie-breaking

# Create data
require(survival)

set.seed(1)
N <- 3000
X1 <- runif(N)
X2 <- runif(N)
X3 <- factor(sample(letters[1:4],N,replace=T))
mu <- c(-1,0,1,2)[as.numeric(X3)]

f <- 0.5*sin(3*X1 + 5*X2^2 + mu/10)
tt.surv <- rexp(N,exp(f))
tt.cens <- rexp(N,0.5)
delta <- as.numeric(tt.surv <= tt.cens)
tt <- apply(cbind(tt.surv,tt.cens),1,min)

# throw in some missing values
X1[sample(1:N,size=100)] <- NA
X3[sample(1:N,size=300)] <- NA

# random weights if you want to experiment with them
w <- rep(1,N)
data <- data.frame(tt=tt,delta=delta,X1=X1,X2=X2,X3=X3)

# Set up distribution objects
cox_breslow <- gbm_dist("CoxPH", ties="breslow", prior_node_coeff_var=100)
cox_efron <- gbm_dist("CoxPH", ties="efron", prior_node_coeff_var=100)

# Define training parameters
params <- training_params(num_trees=3000, interaction_depth=3, min_num_obs_in_node=10, 
                          shrinkage=0.001, bag_fraction=0.5, id=seq(nrow(data)), 
                          num_train=N/2, num_features=3)

# Fit gbm 
fit_breslow <- gbmt(Surv(tt, delta)~X1+X2+X3, data=data, distribution=cox_breslow, 
                    weights=w, train_params=params, var_monotone=c(0, 0, 0), 
                    keep_gbm_data=TRUE, cv_folds=5, is_verbose = FALSE)

fit_efron <- gbmt(Surv(tt, delta)~X1+X2+X3, data=data, distribution=cox_efron,
                  weights=w, train_params=params, var_monotone=c(0, 0, 0), 
                  keep_gbm_data=TRUE, cv_folds=5, is_verbose = FALSE)


# Evaluate fit 
plot(gbmt_performance(fit_breslow, method='test'))
legend("topleft", c("training error", "test error", "optimal iteration"),
       lty=c(1, 1, 2), col=c("black", "red", "blue"))

plot(gbmt_performance(fit_efron, method='test'))
legend("topleft", c("training error", "test error", "optimal iteration"),
       lty=c(1, 1, 2), col=c("black", "red", "blue"))

Description of the underlying algorithm - specifically for CoxPH

The gbm algorithm estimates, via tree boosting, the additive predictor \(f(\textbf{x})\). For CoxPH, this predictor is the log relative risk used in the Cox partial likelihood, rather than a direct prediction of the event indicator. For CoxPH, the algorithm calculates both the partial log likelihood and martingale residuals (\(\textbf{m}\)) using the following approach. The algorithm walks backwards in time until it encounters the “stop” time of an observation. When this happens the weighted risk associated with that observation, \(\omega_i e^{f(\textbf{x}_i)}\), is added to the total cumulative hazard: \(S = \sum \omega_j e^{f(\textbf{x}_j)}\), which is initialized at \(0\). Continuing backwards in time when we reach a time before an observation was in the study, that is the algorithm leaves the associated time segment (start, stop], the observation’s contribution to the cumulative hazard is subtracted off. The algorithm is robust to overflow/underflows occurring in \(e^{f(\textbf{x}_i)}\) by subtracting a constant off of the risk score. This constant drifts to ensure overflow does not occur.

This algorithm deals with tied event times using either the Breslow or Efron approximations. The method used is specified by the user but in the event of tied deaths, it defaults to the Efron approximation. It also allows for the introduction of strata and start as well as stop times for each observation, see the previous Sections.

As well as calculating the partial log likelihood the algorithm also calculates the martingale residuals. The risk scores are related to the covariate matrix, \(\mathbb{X}\), via: \[ f(\textbf{x}_i) = (\mathbb{X}\boldsymbol{\beta})_i. \qquad (1) \] The derivative of the partial log likelihood, \(l(\boldsymbol{\beta})\), with respect to the parameter vector \(\boldsymbol{\beta}\) is related to the martingale residuals through: \[\frac{\partial}{\partial \boldsymbol{\beta}} l(\boldsymbol{\beta}) = \mathbb{X}^{T} \textbf{m}. \qquad (2) \] Defining the loss function as the negative of the partial log likelihood then using the chain rule in combination with Equation (1) the residuals are given by: \[ z_i = -\frac{\partial}{\partial f(\textbf{x}_{\textit{i}})}\Psi(\textit{y}_{\textit{i}},f(\textbf{x}_\textit{i})) = (\mathbb{X}\mathbb{X}^{T}\textbf{m})_i. \qquad (3)\]

At this point the covariate matrix should only decide what splits the tree will make thus covariate matrix in Equation (3) is free to be set to the identity matrix and so: \[ z_i = \textbf{m}_i. \qquad (4)\]

Finally, the updated implementation calculates the optimal terminal node predictions in the following way. Looping over the bagged observations in the terminal node of interest the expected number of events is given by: \(\sum_i \max(0.0, y_i - \textbf{m}_i) + 1/c\). The constant \(c\) represents the prior on the baseline number of events that occur within a given terminal node; it can be set on construction of the CoxPHGBMDist through the prior_node_coeff_var parameter. From this the terminal node prediction is given by: \[ \log(\frac{\sum_i y_i + 1/c}{\sum_i \max(0.0, y_i - \textbf{m}_i) + 1/c}). \qquad (5)\]

If prior_node_coeff_var is not set to a finite positive double, the fitted model’s predictions can become nonsensical.