CRAN Package Check Results for Package MM

Last updated on 2025-12-04 21:49:45 CET.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 1.6-8 4.45 55.16 59.61 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 1.6-8 3.14 40.04 43.18 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 1.6-8 88.04 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 1.6-8 20.00 85.60 105.60 OK
r-devel-windows-x86_64 1.6-8 7.00 101.00 108.00 OK
r-patched-linux-x86_64 1.6-8 4.57 48.39 52.96 OK
r-release-linux-x86_64 1.6-8 4.27 51.64 55.91 OK
r-release-macos-arm64 1.6-8 OK
r-release-macos-x86_64 1.6-8 6.00 67.00 73.00 OK
r-release-windows-x86_64 1.6-8 6.00 100.00 106.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 1.6-8 OK
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 1.6-8 3.00 51.00 54.00 OK
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 1.6-8 7.00 103.00 110.00 OK

Check Details

Version: 1.6-8
Check: CRAN incoming feasibility
Result: NOTE Maintainer: ‘Robin K. S. Hankin <hankin.robin@gmail.com>’ No Authors@R field in DESCRIPTION. Please add one, modifying Authors@R: c(person(given = c("Robin", "K.", "S."), family = "Hankin", role = c("aut", "cre"), email = "hankin.robin@gmail.com"), person(given = c("P.", "M.", "E."), family = "Altham", role = "aut")) as necessary. Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc

Version: 1.6-8
Check: HTML version of manual
Result: NOTE Found the following HTML validation problems: MM.html:746:1 (MM.Rd:10): Warning: <script> anchor "MathJax-script" already defined MM.html:1119:1 (multinomial.Rd:7): Warning: <script> anchor "MathJax-script" already defined MM.html:1299:1 (paras.Rd:22): Warning: <script> anchor "MathJax-script" already defined MM.html:1410:1 (pollen.Rd:8): Warning: <script> anchor "MathJax-script" already defined MM.html:1656:1 (suffstats.Rd:10): Warning: <script> anchor "MathJax-script" already defined MM.html:1779:1 (sweets.Rd:10): Warning: <script> anchor "MathJax-script" already defined Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.