Last updated on 2025-04-10 08:58:32 CEST.
Flavor | Version | Tinstall | Tcheck | Ttotal | Status | Flags |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang | 0.1.3 | 3.71 | 37.47 | 41.18 | NOTE | |
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc | 0.1.3 | 2.98 | 28.87 | 31.85 | NOTE | |
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang | 0.1.3 | 67.70 | NOTE | |||
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc | 0.1.3 | 62.89 | NOTE | |||
r-devel-macos-arm64 | 0.1.3 | 26.00 | OK | |||
r-devel-macos-x86_64 | 0.1.3 | 41.00 | OK | |||
r-devel-windows-x86_64 | 0.1.3 | 6.00 | 60.00 | 66.00 | NOTE | |
r-patched-linux-x86_64 | 0.1.3 | 4.18 | 37.01 | 41.19 | NOTE | |
r-release-linux-x86_64 | 0.1.3 | NOTE | ||||
r-release-macos-arm64 | 0.1.3 | 25.00 | OK | |||
r-release-macos-x86_64 | 0.1.3 | 34.00 | OK | |||
r-release-windows-x86_64 | 0.1.3 | 5.00 | 58.00 | 63.00 | OK | |
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 | 0.1.3 | OK | ||||
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 | 0.1.3 | 34.00 | OK | |||
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 | 0.1.3 | 7.00 | 63.00 | 70.00 | OK |
Version: 0.1.3
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE
Found the following Rd file(s) with Rd \link{} targets missing package
anchors:
genkeys.Rd: openssl
Please provide package anchors for all Rd \link{} targets not in the
package itself and the base packages.
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64
Version: 0.1.3
Check: for non-standard things in the check directory
Result: NOTE
Found the following files/directories:
‘file.path(temp_dir, gp2.csv)’
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64
Version: 0.1.3
Check: dependencies in R code
Result: NOTE
Namespace in Imports field not imported from: ‘knitr’
All declared Imports should be used.
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.