Last updated on 2024-09-01 05:49:26 CEST.
Flavor | Version | Tinstall | Tcheck | Ttotal | Status | Flags |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang | 1.0.0 | 7.24 | 79.41 | 86.65 | NOTE | |
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc | 1.0.0 | 5.17 | 52.33 | 57.50 | NOTE | |
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang | 1.0.0 | 138.50 | NOTE | |||
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc | 1.0.0 | 139.63 | NOTE | |||
r-devel-windows-x86_64 | 1.0.0 | 10.00 | 91.00 | 101.00 | NOTE | |
r-patched-linux-x86_64 | 1.0.0 | 6.84 | 73.27 | 80.11 | NOTE | |
r-release-linux-x86_64 | 1.0.0 | 6.45 | 72.88 | 79.33 | NOTE | |
r-release-macos-arm64 | 1.0.0 | 46.00 | NOTE | |||
r-release-macos-x86_64 | 1.0.0 | 67.00 | NOTE | |||
r-release-windows-x86_64 | 1.0.0 | 12.00 | 91.00 | 103.00 | NOTE | |
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 | 1.0.0 | 48.00 | OK | |||
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 | 1.0.0 | 70.00 | OK | |||
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 | 1.0.0 | 11.00 | 110.00 | 121.00 | OK |
Version: 1.0.0
Check: Rd files
Result: NOTE
checkRd: (-1) dofix.Rd:93: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?
93 | (the variance of the errors u if \code{robust}={0})}
| ^
checkRd: (-1) doglob.Rd:38: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly
checkRd: (-1) doglob.Rd:39: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly
checkRd: (-1) doglob.Rd:40: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly
checkRd: (-1) doorder.Rd:91: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?
91 | (the variance of the errors u if \code{robust}={0})}
| ^
checkRd: (-1) doseqtests.Rd:94: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?
94 | (the variance of the errors u if \code{robust}={0})}
| ^
checkRd: (-1) dosequa.Rd:94: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?
94 | (the variance of the errors u if \code{robust}={0})}
| ^
checkRd: (-1) dotest.Rd:81: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?
81 | (the variance of the errors u if \code{robust}={0})}
| ^
checkRd: (-1) estim.Rd:33: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly
checkRd: (-1) estim.Rd:34: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly
checkRd: (-1) estim.Rd:35-38: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly
checkRd: (-1) estim.Rd:39: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly
checkRd: (-1) mdl.Rd:80: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?
80 | assumed identical across segments (the variance of the errors u if \code{robust}={0})}
| ^
checkRd: (-1) spflp1.Rd:37: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly
checkRd: (-1) spflp1.Rd:38: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly
checkRd: (-1) spflp1.Rd:43: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly
checkRd: (-1) spflp1.Rd:44: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-macos-arm64, r-release-macos-x86_64, r-release-windows-x86_64
Version: 1.0.0
Check: HTML version of manual
Result: NOTE
Found the following HTML validation problems:
compile_sbtests.html:31:1 (compile_sbtests.Rd:29): Warning: trimming empty <li>
dorepart.html:93:1 (dorepart.Rd:47): Warning: trimming empty <li>
dosequa.html:94:1 (dosequa.Rd:49): Warning: trimming empty <li>
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-windows-x86_64
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.