Last updated on 2024-11-24 15:49:56 CET.
Package | NOTE | OK |
---|---|---|
TSclust | 11 | 2 |
Current CRAN status: NOTE: 11, OK: 2
Version: 1.3.1
Check: Rd files
Result: NOTE
checkRd: (-1) diss.AR.LPC.CEPS.Rd:39: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?
39 | If \code{order.x} or {order.y} are \code{NULL}, their respective series will be fitted automatically using a AR model.
| ^
checkRd: (-1) diss.AR.PIC.Rd:31: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?
31 | If \code{order.x} or {order.y} are \code{NULL}, their respective series will be fitted automatically using a AR model. If \code{permissive} is \code{TRUE} and no AR order is found automatically, an AR order of 1 will be imposed, if this case fails, then no order can be found and the function produces an error.
| ^
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-macos-arm64, r-release-macos-x86_64, r-release-windows-x86_64
Version: 1.3.1
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE
Found the following Rd file(s) with Rd \link{} targets missing package
anchors:
diss.DTWARP.Rd: pdc
diss.FRECHET.Rd: longitudinalData
diss.PDC.Rd: pdc
diss.Rd: pdc
Please provide package anchors for all Rd \link{} targets not in the
package itself and the base packages.
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64
Version: 1.3.1
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE
Package unavailable to check Rd xrefs: ‘fpc’
Flavor: r-oldrel-macos-x86_64
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.