Last updated on 2025-01-30 16:48:36 CET.
Flavor | Version | Tinstall | Tcheck | Ttotal | Status | Flags |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang | 0.2.4 | 23.91 | 183.25 | 207.16 | NOTE | |
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc | 0.2.4 | 18.37 | 146.39 | 164.76 | NOTE | |
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang | 0.2.4 | 349.22 | NOTE | |||
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc | 0.2.4 | 344.75 | NOTE | |||
r-devel-windows-x86_64 | 0.2.4 | 21.00 | 230.00 | 251.00 | NOTE | |
r-patched-linux-x86_64 | 0.2.4 | 28.17 | 175.17 | 203.34 | OK | |
r-release-linux-x86_64 | 0.2.4 | 23.35 | 172.62 | 195.97 | OK | |
r-release-macos-arm64 | 0.2.4 | 140.00 | OK | |||
r-release-macos-x86_64 | 0.2.4 | 198.00 | OK | |||
r-release-windows-x86_64 | 0.2.4 | 23.00 | 171.00 | 194.00 | OK | |
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 | 0.2.4 | 86.00 | OK | |||
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 | 0.2.4 | 184.00 | OK | |||
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 | 0.2.4 | 26.00 | 229.00 | 255.00 | OK |
Version: 0.2.4
Check: DESCRIPTION meta-information
Result: NOTE
Missing dependency on R >= 4.1.0 because package code uses the pipe
|> or function shorthand \(...) syntax added in R 4.1.0.
File(s) using such syntax:
‘sepstlppm.R’ ‘sepstppm.R’
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64
Version: 0.2.4
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE
Found the following Rd file(s) with Rd \link{} targets missing package
anchors:
globaldiag.Rd: STIKhat, STLKinhom
localSTLKinhom.Rd: STLKinhom, STLginhom
localdiag.Rd: KLISTAhat
localtest.Rd: KLISTAhat, LISTAhat
plot.globaldiag.Rd: STLKinhom
plot.locstppm.Rd: OS
plot.sepstppm.Rd: OS
plot.stlgcppm.Rd: OS
plot.stlp.Rd: plot3D
plot.stppm.Rd: OS
sepstlppm.Rd: lppm
sepstppm.Rd: ppm
Please provide package anchors for all Rd \link{} targets not in the
package itself and the base packages.
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.