The method proposed in this package takes into account the impact of dependence on the multiple testing procedures for high-throughput data as proposed by Friguet et al. (2009). The common information shared by all the variables is modeled by a factor analysis structure. The number of factors considered in the model is chosen to reduce the false discoveries variance in multiple tests. The model parameters are estimated thanks to an EM algorithm. Adjusted tests statistics are derived, as well as the associated p-values. The proportion of true null hypotheses (an important parameter when controlling the false discovery rate) is also estimated from the FAMT model. Graphics are proposed to interpret and describe the factors.

Computes the penalized maximum likelihood estimates of factor loadings and unique variances for various tuning parameters. The pathwise coordinate descent along with EM algorithm is used.  This package also includes a new graphical tool which outputs path diagram, goodness-of-fit indices and model selection criteria for each regularization parameter. The user can change the regularization parameter by manipulating scrollbars, which is helpful to find a suitable value of regularization parameter.

A collection of R functions to perform nonparametric 
    analysis of covariance for regression curves or surfaces. 
    Testing the equality or parallelism of nonparametric curves 
    or surfaces is equivalent to analysis of variance (ANOVA) or 
    analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for one-sample functional data. 
    Three different testing methods are available in the package, 
    including one based on L-2 distance, one based on an ANOVA 
    statistic, and one based on variance estimators.

Provides the function fancycut() which is like cut() except
  you can mix left open and right open intervals with point values,
  intervals that are closed on both ends and intervals that are open on both ends.

A neighborhood-based, greedy search algorithm is performed to estimate a feature allocation by minimizing the expected loss based on posterior samples from the feature allocation distribution. The method is currently under peer review but an earlier draft is available in Dahl, Johnson, and Andros (2022+) <doi:10.48550/arXiv.2207.13824>.