The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
adjusted.weight.SI(): Calculates the adjusted weight
for a given sub-item of a linguistic questionnaireFor a given observation, FuzzySTs::adjusted.weight.SI()
calculates the adjusted weight of a sub-item of a linguistic
questionnaire when non-response is present. This function re-distributes
the weights on the non-missing answers. Counting the answers in a given
sub-item can be done based on the functions
FuzzySTs::delta_jki() and
FuzzySTs::Delta_jki(). This function returns a numerical
value giving the re-adjusted weight of the sub-item k of the
considered main-item for the observation i.
adjusted.weight.MI(): Calculates the adjusted weight
for a given main-item of a linguistic questionnaireWhen non-response is present,
FuzzySTs::adjusted.weight.MI() calculates the adjusted
weight given to a main-item of a linguistic questionnaire related to a
particular observation. This function re-distributes the weights based
on the missing answers occuring in a given main-item. The calculation of
the readjusted weight in a sub-item is done using the function
FuzzySTs::adjusted.weight.SI(). For the inputs of this
function, a decomposition by main-items and sub-items similar to the one
described using the function FuzzySTs::FUZZ() or the
function FuzzySTs::IND.EVAL() is needed. We remind that the
membership functions should be called “MF” attached to the index of the
main-item followed by the one of the sub-item i.e. the variable, and
finally the index of the linguistic term. This function returns a
numerical value giving the re-adjusted weight of the main-item
j for the observation i.
# Calculation of a re-adjusted weight of the main-item 1 for the observation 9
data <- matrix(c(3,4,2,3,3,2,4,3,3,4,3,4,4,2,5,3,4,4,3,3,3,4,4,3,
3,3,4,3,3,3,3,4,4,3,5,3,4,3,3,3), ncol = 4)
data <- as.data.frame(data)
MI <- 2 # main-items
SI1 <- 2
SI2 <- 2
SI <- c(SI1,SI2) # decomposition by sub-items
b_j <- c(1/2,1/2) # weights of main-items
b_jk <- matrix(c(0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5),nrow=2) # weights of sub-items by main-items
PA11 <- c(1,2,3,4,5) # possible answers for the sub-item 1 of the main-item 1
PA12 <- c(1,2,3,4,5) # possible answers for the sub-item 2 of the main-item 1
PA21 <- c(1,2,3,4,5) # possible answers for the sub-item 1 of the main-item 2
PA22 <- c(1,2,3,4,5) # possible answers for the sub-item 2 of the main-item 2
# Fuzzification step
# ------------------
MF111 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(0,2,2,7)
MF112 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(2,7,7,15)
MF113 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(7,15,15,23)
MF114 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(15,23,23,28)
MF115 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(23,28,28,30)
MF11 <- GFUZZ(data, 1, 1, PA11, spec="Identical", breakpoints = 100)
# ------------------
MF121 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(0,2,2,7)
MF122 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(2,7,7,15)
MF123 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(7,15,15,23)
MF124 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(15,23,23,28)
MF125 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(23,28,28,30)
MF12 <- GFUZZ(data, 1, 2, PA12, spec="Identical", breakpoints = 100)
# ------------------
MF211 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(0,2,2,7)
MF212 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(2,7,7,15)
MF213 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(7,15,15,23)
MF214 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(15,23,23,28)
MF215 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(23,28,28,30)
MF21 <- GFUZZ(data, 2, 1, PA21, spec="Identical", breakpoints = 100)
# ------------------
MF221 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(0,2,2,7)
MF222 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(2,7,7,15)
MF223 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(7,15,15,23)
MF224 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(15,23,23,28)
MF225 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(23,28,28,30)
MF22 <- GFUZZ(data, 2, 2, PA22, spec="Identical", breakpoints = 100)
# ------------------
range <- matrix(c(0,0,0,0,28,28,28,28), ncol=2)
adjusted.weight.MI(data, 9, 1, b_j, b_jk, SI)
#> [1] 0.5IND.EVAL(): Calculates the individual evaluations of a
linguistic questionnaireFuzzySTs::IND.EVAL() calculates the individual
evaluations of a linguistic questionnaire. The user has to define the
data set to be evaluated, and the decomposition of the linguistic
questionnaire by main and sub-items. The related initial weights have to
be defined as well. In addition, a distance has to be chosen from the
family of distances used by the function
FuzzySTs::distance(). Finally, the fuzzy numbers modelling
the different linguistic terms should be given. The computations can be
made using all types of fuzzy numbers. We add that the argument
spec = "Identical" refers to the fact that every linguistic
\(L_{q}\) will be modelled by the
identical fuzzy number across all the observations of the concerned
variable. For the syntax to be used, each fuzzy linguistic should be
called “MF” attached to the index of its main-item, followed by the
index of its sub-item, and the one of the linguistic term, as explained
in the description of the function FuzzySTs::FUZZ(). Let us
recall the detailed decomposition of the modelling schema of the example
of FuzzySTs::FUZZ():
Consider a data set composed by 5 linguistic variables. We expose the needed decomposition in main and sub-items. We propose to divide the data set into \(2\) main-items as given in the following table. For each linguistic term of the considered variable, one has to choose a corresponding modelling fuzzy number. Suppose we want to model the linguistic \(L_{213}\), i.e. the third linguistic term of the first variable found in the second main-item, by a fuzzy number written as \(\tilde{L}_{213}\). Its membership function should then be expressed by MF213 as follows:
| Decomposition 1 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main-item ({mi=1}) | Main-item ({mi=2}) | ||||||||
| Sub-item 1 | Sub-item 2 | Sub-item 3 | Sub-item 1 | Sub-item 2 | |||||
| si=1 | si=2 | si=3 | si=1 | si=2 | |||||
| \(\tilde{L}_{111}\) | MF111 | \(\tilde{L}_{121}\) | MF121 | \(\tilde{L}_{131}\) | MF131 | \(\tilde{L}_{211}\) | MF211 | \(\tilde{L}_{221}\) | MF221 |
| \(\tilde{L}_{112}\) | MF112 | \(\tilde{L}_{122}\) | MF122 | \(\tilde{L}_{132}\) | MF132 | \(\tilde{L}_{212}\) | MF212 | \(\tilde{L}_{222}\) | MF222 |
| \(\tilde{L}_{113}\) | MF113 | \(\tilde{L}_{123}\) | MF123 | \(\tilde{L}_{133}\) | MF133 | \(\tilde{L}_{213}\) | MF213 | ||
| \(\tilde{L}_{114}\) | MF114 | \(\tilde{L}_{134}\) | MF134 | \(\tilde{L}_{214}\) | MF214 |
If the decomposition in main and sub-items is not required, it is then recommended to fix the index of the main-item to \(1\). Consequently, the index of the sub-item will be nothing but the column position of the variable in the architecture of the data set. For the same example previously described where the fourth variable has to be modelled by fuzzy numbers, suppose that no decomposition is desired, then the architecture becomes as seen in the following table. Therefore, the considered linguistic term \(L_{213}\) of the previous example is now on called \(L_{143}\) with its corresponding fuzzy number \(\tilde{L}_{143}\). Its membership function will afterwards be denoted by MF143 as given by:
| Decomposition 2 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main-item ({mi=1}) | |||||||||
| Sub-item 1 | Sub-item 2 | Sub-item 3 | Sub-item 4 | Sub-item 5 | |||||
| si=1 | si=2 | si=3 | si=4 | si=5 | |||||
| \(\tilde{L}_{111}\) | MF111 | \(\tilde{L}_{121}\) | MF121 | \(\tilde{L}_{131}\) | MF131 | \(\tilde{L}_{141}\) | MF141 | \(\tilde{L}_{151}\) | MF151 |
| \(\tilde{L}_{112}\) | MF112 | \(\tilde{L}_{122}\) | MF122 | \(\tilde{L}_{132}\) | MF132 | \(\tilde{L}_{142}\) | MF142 | \(\tilde{L}_{152}\) | MF152 |
| \(\tilde{L}_{113}\) | MF113 | \(\tilde{L}_{123}\) | MF123 | \(\tilde{L}_{133}\) | MF133 | \(\tilde{L}_{143}\) | MF143 | ||
| \(\tilde{L}_{114}\) | MF114 | \(\tilde{L}_{134}\) | MF134 | \(\tilde{L}_{144}\) | MF144 |
We have to mention that adding up the answers of a given linguistic
are implemented as the functions FuzzySTs::delta_jki and
FuzzySTs::Delta_jki respectively. In addition, if
missingness occurs in the data set, we propose to readjust the weights
of the main and sub-items. Practically, this task will be performed
using the function FuzzySTs::adjusted.weight.MI() and
FuzzySTs::adjusted.weight.SI().
Finally, this function returns the data set of individual evaluations, for which the number of observations is exactly the same as the initial data set.
# Calculation the individual evaluations of the following data set
data <- matrix(c(3,4,2,3,3,2,4,3,3,4,3,4,4,2,5,3,4,4,3,3,3,4,4,3,
3,3,4,3,3,3,3,4,4,3,5,3,4,3,3,3), ncol = 4)
data <- as.data.frame(data)
MI <- 2 # main-items
SI1 <- 2
SI2 <- 2
SI <- c(SI1,SI2) # decomposition by sub-items
b_j <- c(1/2,1/2) # weights of main-items
b_jk <- matrix(c(0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5),nrow=2) # weights of sub-items by main-items
PA11 <- c(1,2,3,4,5) # possible answers for the sub-item 1 of the main-item 1
PA12 <- c(1,2,3,4,5) # possible answers for the sub-item 2 of the main-item 1
PA21 <- c(1,2,3,4,5) # possible answers for the sub-item 1 of the main-item 2
PA22 <- c(1,2,3,4,5) # possible answers for the sub-item 2 of the main-item 2
# Fuzzification step
# ------------------
MF111 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(0,2,2,7)
MF112 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(2,7,7,15)
MF113 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(7,15,15,23)
MF114 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(15,23,23,28)
MF115 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(23,28,28,30)
MF11 <- GFUZZ(data, 1, 1, PA11, spec="Identical", breakpoints = 100)
# ------------------
MF121 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(0,2,2,7)
MF122 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(2,7,7,15)
MF123 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(7,15,15,23)
MF124 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(15,23,23,28)
MF125 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(23,28,28,30)
MF12 <- GFUZZ(data, 1, 2, PA12, spec="Identical", breakpoints = 100)
# ------------------
MF211 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(0,2,2,7)
MF212 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(2,7,7,15)
MF213 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(7,15,15,23)
MF214 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(15,23,23,28)
MF215 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(23,28,28,30)
MF21 <- GFUZZ(data, 2, 1, PA21, spec="Identical", breakpoints = 100)
# ------------------
MF221 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(0,2,2,7)
MF222 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(2,7,7,15)
MF223 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(7,15,15,23)
MF224 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(15,23,23,28)
MF225 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(23,28,28,30)
MF22 <- GFUZZ(data, 2, 2, PA22, spec="Identical", breakpoints = 100)
# ------------------
range <- matrix(c(0,0,0,0,28,28,28,28), ncol=2)
ind.eval <- IND.EVAL(data,MI,b_j,SI,b_jk, range = range, distance.type ="DSGD.G")
head(ind.eval)
#> [1] 15.52417 22.48611 18.96555 13.74410 21.41515 13.74410GLOB.EVAL(): Calculates the global evaluation of a
linguistic questionnaireFuzzySTs::GLOB.EVAL() calculates the global evaluation
of a linguistic questionnaire. The arguments of this function, i.e. the
decomposition by main and sub-items, are similar to the ones of the
function FuzzySTs::IND.EVAL().
We have to remind that under the assumption of non-missingness, the
global evaluation is the weighted mean of the set of individual
evaluations resulting from the function
FuzzySTs::IND.EVAL(). Thus, one can get the global
evaluation using the basic function stats::Weighted.mean().
Nevertheless, we introduce a function
FuzzySTs::GLOB.EVAL.mean (ind.eval, p_ind) applied on the
vector of individual evaluations called ind.eval with the
vector of weights denoted by p_ind. We add that if no
sampling weights are applied, the argument p_ind is set to
be p_ind=rep(1, length(ind.eval)). Note that
FuzzySTs::GLOB.EVAL() returns a numerical value
representing the global evaluation of the linguistic questionnaire.
# Calculation of the global evaluation of the following data set
data <- matrix(c(3,4,2,3,3,2,4,3,3,4,3,4,4,2,5,3,4,4,3,3,3,4,4,3,
3,3,4,3,3,3,3,4,4,3,5,3,4,3,3,3), ncol = 4)
data <- as.data.frame(data)
MI <- 2 # main-items
SI1 <- 2
SI2 <- 2
SI <- c(SI1,SI2) # decomposition by sub-items
b_j <- c(1/2,1/2) # weights of main-items
b_jk <- matrix(c(0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5),nrow=2) # weights of sub-items by main-items
PA11 <- c(1,2,3,4,5) # possible answers for the sub-item 1 of the main-item 1
PA12 <- c(1,2,3,4,5) # possible answers for the sub-item 2 of the main-item 1
PA21 <- c(1,2,3,4,5) # possible answers for the sub-item 1 of the main-item 2
PA22 <- c(1,2,3,4,5) # possible answers for the sub-item 2 of the main-item 2
# Fuzzification step
# ------------------
MF111 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(0,2,2,7)
MF112 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(2,7,7,15)
MF113 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(7,15,15,23)
MF114 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(15,23,23,28)
MF115 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(23,28,28,30)
MF11 <- GFUZZ(data, 1, 1, PA11, spec="Identical", breakpoints = 100)
# ------------------
MF121 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(0,2,2,7)
MF122 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(2,7,7,15)
MF123 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(7,15,15,23)
MF124 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(15,23,23,28)
MF125 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(23,28,28,30)
MF12 <- GFUZZ(data, 1, 2, PA12, spec="Identical", breakpoints = 100)
# ------------------
MF211 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(0,2,2,7)
MF212 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(2,7,7,15)
MF213 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(7,15,15,23)
MF214 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(15,23,23,28)
MF215 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(23,28,28,30)
MF21 <- GFUZZ(data, 2, 1, PA21, spec="Identical", breakpoints = 100)
# ------------------
MF221 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(0,2,2,7)
MF222 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(2,7,7,15)
MF223 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(7,15,15,23)
MF224 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(15,23,23,28)
MF225 <- TrapezoidalFuzzyNumber(23,28,28,30)
MF22 <- GFUZZ(data, 2, 2, PA22, spec="Identical", breakpoints = 100)
# ------------------
range <- matrix(c(0,0,0,0,28,28,28,28), ncol=2)
ind.eval <- IND.EVAL(data,MI,b_j,SI,b_jk, range = range, distance.type ="DSGD.G")
(GLOB <- GLOB.EVAL(data, MI, b_j, SI, b_jk, distance.type ="GSGD"))
#> [1] 17.84188
(GLOB.mean <- GLOB.EVAL.mean(ind.eval))
#> [1] 17.84188R(): Calculates the indicator of information’s rate of
the data baseFuzzySTs::R() calculates the indicator of information’s
rate of the complete data base. This computation uses the functions
FuzzySTs::adjusted.weight.SI() and
FuzzySTs::Delta_jki(). The function
FuzzySTs::R() returns a numerical value, interpreted as the
more it tends to the value \(1\), the
less the complete questionnaire contains missing values.
# Calculation of the indicator of information's rate - complete data set
data <- matrix(c(3,4,2,3,3,2,4,3,3,4,3,4,4,2,5,3,4,4,3,3,3,4,4,3,
3,3,4,3,3,3,3,4,4,3,5,3,4,3,3,3), ncol = 4)
data <- as.data.frame(data)
p_ind <- c(0.1,0.05,0.05,0.2,0.1,0.05,0.1,0.1,0.2,0.05) # Observations' weights
SI1 <- 2
SI2 <- 2
SI <- c(SI1,SI2)
b_jk <- matrix(c(0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5),nrow=2)
R(data, p_ind, b_jk, SI)
#> [1] 1Ri(): Calculates the indicator of information’s rate of
the data base for a given unitFuzzySTs::Ri() calculates the indicator of information’s
rate of the complete data base for a given unit. This computation uses
the functions FuzzySTs::adjusted.weight.SI() and
FuzzySTs::Delta_jki(). The function
FuzzySTs::Ri() returns a numerical value related to a
particular observation. This value is interpreted as the more it tends
to the value \(1\), the less the
complete questionnaire contains missing values.
# Calculation of the indicator of information's rate for the unit 7
data <- matrix(c(3,4,2,3,3,2,4,3,3,4,3,4,4,2,5,3,4,4,3,3,3,4,4,3,
3,3,4,3,3,3,3,4,4,3,5,3,4,3,3,3), ncol = 4)
data <- as.data.frame(data)
SI1 <- 2
SI2 <- 2
SI <- c(SI1,SI2)
b_jk <- matrix(c(0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5),nrow=2)
Ri(data, 7, b_jk, SI)
#> [1] 1These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.