The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
GoldenVizR is a review layer for ggplot2 charts. You
create the chart as usual, then call analyze_plot() to get
structured feedback.
library(ggplot2)
library(GoldenVizR)
p <- ggplot(mtcars, aes(wt, mpg, colour = factor(cyl))) +
geom_point() +
labs(
title = "Fuel economy by weight",
subtitle = "Motor Trend cars",
x = "Weight",
y = "Miles per gallon",
colour = "Cylinders",
caption = "Source: mtcars"
)
report <- analyze_plot(p)
report$summary## checked_rules implemented_checks pass warning fail info status
## 1 25 25 24 1 0 0 warning
A GoldenVizR report is a list with four stable fields:
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
plot_summary |
Basic metadata extracted from the ggplot2 object,
including title, axis labels, geoms, layers, data size, facets, and
coordinates. |
rule_results |
One row per GoldenViz rule, with the rule id, family, name, status, message, and suggestion column. |
status_counts |
Counts of PASS, WARNING,
FAIL, and INFO. |
summary |
One-row overview with checked rules, implemented checks, status counts, and report status. |
Inspect rules that need attention:
## rule_id family rule status
## 15 R15 Readability Direct labeling when useful WARNING
## message suggestion
## 15 Direct labels may improve readability. <NA>
Manual analysis means passing a specific ggplot2 object
to analyze_plot() and inspecting the returned report
yourself. This is useful in notebooks, teaching material, package tests,
dashboards, or review workflows where you want explicit control over
which chart is checked.
manual_plot <- ggplot(mtcars, aes(factor(cyl), mpg)) +
geom_boxplot() +
labs(
title = "Fuel economy by cylinder count",
x = "Cylinders",
y = "Miles per gallon",
caption = "Source: mtcars"
)
manual_report <- analyze_plot(manual_plot)
manual_report$summary## checked_rules implemented_checks pass warning fail info status
## 1 25 23 22 1 0 2 warning
Inspect the full rule table:
## rule_id family rule status
## 1 R1 Completeness Clear title PASS
## 2 R2 Completeness Axis labels PASS
## 3 R3 Completeness Missing values and gaps PASS
## 4 R4 Completeness Legend clarity INFO
## 5 R5 Completeness Source and context PASS
## 6 R6 Completeness Annotation for key message PASS
## 7 R7 Readability Readable text PASS
## 8 R8 Readability Accessible color choices PASS
## 9 R9 Readability Avoid clutter PASS
## 10 R10 Readability Grid and guide balance PASS
## 11 R11 Readability Consistent formatting PASS
## 12 R12 Readability Appropriate chart type PASS
## 13 R13 Readability Readable scale labels PASS
## 14 R14 Readability Overplotting management PASS
## 15 R15 Readability Direct labeling when useful INFO
## 16 R16 Readability Visual hierarchy PASS
## 17 R17 Integrity Truthful scale PASS
## 18 R18 Integrity No distorted baseline PASS
## 19 R19 Integrity Avoid misleading encodings PASS
## 20 R20 Integrity Handle outliers honestly PASS
## 21 R21 Integrity Proportional areas PASS
## 22 R22 Integrity Uncertainty when needed WARNING
## 23 R23 Integrity Avoid cherry picking PASS
## 24 R24 Integrity Respect data granularity PASS
## 25 R25 Integrity Neutral framing PASS
## message suggestion
## 1 Title text is present. <NA>
## 2 Both axis labels are present. <NA>
## 3 No missing values or gaps were reported. <NA>
## 4 No legend information was supplied. <NA>
## 5 Source or contextual caption is present. <NA>
## 6 No annotation need was reported. <NA>
## 7 Text size appears readable. <NA>
## 8 Color choices were reported as accessible. <NA>
## 9 No high clutter signal was reported. <NA>
## 10 Grid or guide information was supplied. <NA>
## 11 Formatting was reported as consistent. <NA>
## 12 Chart type information was supplied. <NA>
## 13 Scale label information appears readable. <NA>
## 14 No overplotting signal was reported. <NA>
## 15 Direct-labeling need was not supplied. <NA>
## 16 Visual hierarchy information was supplied. <NA>
## 17 Scale was reported as truthful. <NA>
## 18 No zero-baseline requirement was reported. <NA>
## 19 No misleading encoding was reported. <NA>
## 20 No outliers were reported. <NA>
## 21 No area encoding was reported. <NA>
## 22 Uncertainty appears needed but was not reported. <NA>
## 23 No cherry-picking risk was reported. <NA>
## 24 Data granularity was reported as respected. <NA>
## 25 Framing was reported as neutral. <NA>
Most workflows start by filtering to rows that are not
PASS:
## rule_id family rule status
## 4 R4 Completeness Legend clarity INFO
## 15 R15 Readability Direct labeling when useful INFO
## 22 R22 Integrity Uncertainty when needed WARNING
## message suggestion
## 4 No legend information was supplied. <NA>
## 15 Direct-labeling need was not supplied. <NA>
## 22 Uncertainty appears needed but was not reported. <NA>
You can also inspect a specific rule family:
## rule_id family rule status
## 17 R17 Integrity Truthful scale PASS
## 18 R18 Integrity No distorted baseline PASS
## 19 R19 Integrity Avoid misleading encodings PASS
## 20 R20 Integrity Handle outliers honestly PASS
## 21 R21 Integrity Proportional areas PASS
## 22 R22 Integrity Uncertainty when needed WARNING
## 23 R23 Integrity Avoid cherry picking PASS
## 24 R24 Integrity Respect data granularity PASS
## 25 R25 Integrity Neutral framing PASS
## message suggestion
## 17 Scale was reported as truthful. <NA>
## 18 No zero-baseline requirement was reported. <NA>
## 19 No misleading encoding was reported. <NA>
## 20 No outliers were reported. <NA>
## 21 No area encoding was reported. <NA>
## 22 Uncertainty appears needed but was not reported. <NA>
## 23 No cherry-picking risk was reported. <NA>
## 24 Data granularity was reported as respected. <NA>
## 25 Framing was reported as neutral. <NA>
Because the report is structured, it can be used programmatically:
## [1] FALSE
## PASS WARNING FAIL INFO
## 22 1 0 2
Use render_report() when you want a formatted HTML
version of the same structured review.
In an R Markdown document, the rendered report can be printed from a
code chunk. To save the same report as a standalone HTML file, use
save_report():
If your installed version includes view_report(), use it
for quick local inspection:
The HTML report is expected to include the same core sections as the structured object:
## [1] "plot_summary" "rule_results" "status_counts" "summary"
The report can also be embedded directly inside documentation, notebooks, and HTML reports:
The main areas of the report are annotated below:
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
PASS |
The available evidence satisfied the rule. |
WARNING |
GoldenVizR found a likely issue or improvement opportunity. |
FAIL |
GoldenVizR found a stronger integrity, scale, or accessibility issue. |
INFO |
The plot object did not contain enough evidence for a responsible check. |
GoldenVizR is intentionally heuristic. It helps catch common issues early, but it does not replace human judgment.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.