README

The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.

SDModels

Spectrally Deconfounded Models (SDModels) is a package with methods to screen for and analyze non-linear sparse direct effects in the presence of unobserved confounding using the spectral deconfounding techniques (Ćevid, Bühlmann, and Meinshausen (2020), Guo, Ćevid, and Bühlmann (2022)). These methods have been shown to be a good estimate for the true direct effect if we observe many covariates, e.g., high-dimensional settings, and we have fairly dense confounding. Even if the assumptions are violated, it seems like there is not much to lose, and the SDModels will, in general, estimate a function closer to the true one than classical least squares optimization. SDModels provides software for Spectrally Deconfounded Additive Models (SDAMs) (Scheidegger, Guo, and Bühlmann (2025)) and Spectrally Deconfounded Random Forests (SDForest)(Ulmer, Scheidegger, and Bühlmann (2025)).

Installation

install.packages(SDModels)

# install.packages("devtools")
devtools::install_github("markusul/SDModels")

# install.packages('pak')
# pak::pkg_install('markusul/SDModels')

Usage

This is a basic example on how to estimate the direct effect of \(X\) on \(Y\) using SDForest. You can learn more about analyzing sparse direct effects estimated by SDForest in the article SDForest.

library(SDModels)

set.seed(42)
# simulation of confounded data
sim_data <- simulate_data_nonlinear(q = 2, p = 50, n = 100, m = 2)
X <- sim_data$X
Y <- sim_data$Y
train_data <- data.frame(X, Y)
# parents
sim_data$j
#> [1] 25 24

fit <- SDForest(Y ~ ., train_data)
fit
#> SDForest result
#> 
#> Number of trees:  100 
#> Number of covariates:  50 
#> OOB loss:  0.17 
#> OOB spectral loss:  0.05

You can also estimate just one Spectrally Deconfounded Regression Tree using the SDTree function. See also the article SDTree.

Tree <- SDTree(Y ~ ., train_data, cp = 0.03)

# plot the tree
Tree
#>   levelName     value          s  j        label decision n_samples
#> 1 1         0.8295434  0.5186858 24  X24 <= 0.52                100
#> 2  ¦--1     0.6418912 -2.0062213 25 X25 <= -2.01      yes        63
#> 3  ¦   ¦--1 0.1522660         NA NA          0.2      yes         9
#> 4  ¦   °--3 0.6609876         NA NA          0.7       no        54
#> 5  °--2     1.1821439  1.5229617 24  X24 <= 1.52       no        37
#> 6      ¦--2 1.0367566         NA NA            1      yes        19
#> 7      °--4 1.4551242         NA NA          1.5       no        18
#plot(Tree)

Or you can estimate a Spectrally Deconfounded Additive Model, with theoretical guarantees, using the SDAM function. See also the article SDAM.

model <- SDAM(Y ~ ., train_data)
#> [1] "Initial cross-validation"
#> [1] "Second stage cross-validation"

model
#> SDAM result
#> 
#> Number of covariates:  50 
#> Number of active covariates:  4

Ćevid, Domagoj, Peter Bühlmann, and Nicolai Meinshausen. 2020. “Spectral Deconfounding via Perturbed Sparse Linear Models.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 21 (1). http://jmlr.org/papers/v21/19-545.html.

Guo, Zijian, Domagoj Ćevid, and Peter Bühlmann. 2022. “Doubly debiased lasso: High-dimensional inference under hidden confounding.” The Annals of Statistics 50 (3). https://doi.org/10.1214/21-AOS2152.

Scheidegger, Cyrill, Zijian Guo, and Peter Bühlmann. 2025. “Spectral Deconfounding for High-Dimensional Sparse Additive Models.” ACM / IMS J. Data Sci. https://doi.org/10.1145/3711116.

Ulmer, Markus, Cyrill Scheidegger, and Peter Bühlmann. 2025. “Spectrally Deconfounded Random Forests.” https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03969.

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.