The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.

Tierney-Kadane Approximation: Theory and Derivation

Your Name

2026-07-31

Introduction

The Tierney-Kadane (TK) approximation is a powerful method for approximating posterior expectations in Bayesian analysis. This vignette provides the theoretical foundation and derivation of the TK approximation as implemented in TKApprox.

Problem Statement

Given data \(x\) and parameter vector \(\theta\), we want to compute posterior expectations of the form:

\[E[g(\theta) | x] = \int g(\theta) p(\theta | x) d\theta\]

where \(p(\theta | x)\) is the posterior distribution:

\[p(\theta | x) = \frac{L(\theta | x) \pi(\theta)}{\int L(\theta | x) \pi(\theta) d\theta}\]

Here, \(L(\theta | x)\) is the likelihood and \(\pi(\theta)\) is the prior.

For many models, these integrals are intractable and require numerical methods. The Tierney-Kadane approximation provides an efficient analytical approximation.

Laplace Approximation Background

The TK approximation builds on the Laplace approximation, which approximates integrals of the form:

\[I = \int e^{n h(\theta)} d\theta\]

where \(n\) is the sample size and \(h(\theta)\) is a smooth function.

The Laplace approximation states:

\[I \approx e^{n h(\hat{\theta})} \left(\frac{2\pi}{n}\right)^{k/2} |\Sigma|^{1/2}\]

where: - \(\hat{\theta} = \arg\max h(\theta)\) is the mode of \(h\) - \(\Sigma = -[H(\hat{\theta})]^{-1}\) is the negative inverse Hessian at the mode - \(k\) is the dimension of \(\theta\)

Tierney-Kadane Derivation

Step 1: Posterior Mode

Define the normalized log-posterior:

\[h(\theta) = \frac{1}{n} [\log L(\theta | x) + \log \pi(\theta)]\]

Find the posterior mode:

\[\hat{\theta} = \arg\max h(\theta)\]

Compute the Hessian at the mode:

\[H(\hat{\theta}) = \frac{\partial^2 h}{\partial \theta \partial \theta^T}\bigg|_{\theta = \hat{\theta}}\]

The approximate posterior covariance is:

\[\Sigma = -H(\hat{\theta})^{-1}\]

Step 2: Modified Function for Expectation

To compute \(E[g(\theta) | x]\), define:

\[h^*(\theta) = h(\theta) + \frac{1}{n} \log g(\theta)\]

Find the mode of the modified function:

\[\theta^* = \arg\max h^*(\theta)\]

Compute the Hessian at this mode:

\[H^*(\theta^*) = \frac{\partial^2 h^*}{\partial \theta \partial \theta^T}\bigg|_{\theta = \theta^*}\]

The modified covariance is:

\[\Sigma^* = -H^*(\theta^*)^{-1}\]

Step 3: TK Approximation Formula

The posterior expectation can be written as:

\[E[g(\theta) | x] = \frac{\int g(\theta) L(\theta | x) \pi(\theta) d\theta}{\int L(\theta | x) \pi(\theta) d\theta} = \frac{\int e^{n h^*(\theta)} d\theta}{\int e^{n h(\theta)} d\theta}\]

Applying the Laplace approximation to both numerator and denominator:

\[E[g(\theta) | x] \approx \frac{e^{n h^*(\theta^*)} \left(\frac{2\pi}{n}\right)^{k/2} |\Sigma^*|^{1/2}}{e^{n h(\hat{\theta})} \left(\frac{2\pi}{n}\right)^{k/2} |\Sigma|^{1/2}}\]

Simplifying:

\[E[g(\theta) | x] \approx \sqrt{\frac{|\Sigma^*|}{|\Sigma|}} \cdot e^{n [h^*(\theta^*) - h(\hat{\theta})]}\]

This is the Tierney-Kadane approximation.

Properties of the TK Approximation

Accuracy

The TK approximation has error of order \(O(n^{-2})\), which is better than the standard Laplace approximation’s \(O(n^{-1})\) error rate.

Requirements

  1. Smoothness: \(h(\theta)\) and \(h^*(\theta)\) must be smooth (at least twice differentiable)
  2. Unimodality: The posterior should be approximately unimodal
  3. Positive definiteness: The Hessian matrices must be positive definite at the modes
  4. Sample size: Larger sample sizes improve accuracy

Advantages

  1. Computationally efficient: Only requires optimization and Hessian computation
  2. No sampling: Unlike MCMC, no random sampling is required
  3. Deterministic: Results are reproducible
  4. Covariance matrix: Provides approximate posterior covariance directly

Limitations

  1. Multimodal posteriors: May fail for highly multimodal posteriors
  2. Small samples: Less accurate for very small sample sizes
  3. Boundary issues: Can have problems with parameters near boundaries
  4. Numerical stability: Requires careful numerical implementation

Implementation in TKApprox

Function Structure

TKApprox implements the TK approximation through the following functions:

  1. tk_posterior(): Constructs \(h(\theta)\) from likelihood and prior
  2. tk_mode(): Finds \(\hat{\theta}\) via numerical optimization
  3. tk_hessian(): Computes \(H(\hat{\theta})\) and \(\Sigma\)
  4. tk_expectation(): Implements the full TK approximation for \(E[g(\theta) | x]\)

Example: Computing Posterior Mean

# Define exponential distribution
pdf_exp <- function(x, param) dexp(x, rate = param)
cdf_exp <- function(x, param) pexp(x, rate = param)

# Gamma prior
prior_spec <- list(rate = list(family = "gamma", hyperparameters = list(shape = 2, rate = 1)))

# Generate data
set.seed(123)
data <- rexp(20, rate = 1.5)

# Construct log-posterior
log_post <- tk_posterior(data, "complete", pdf_exp, cdf_exp, prior_spec)

# Find posterior mode
mode_result <- tk_mode(log_post, initial_values = c(rate = 1))

# Compute Hessian and covariance
hessian_result <- tk_hessian(log_post, mode_result$mode)

# Compute posterior mean using TK approximation
g_fn <- function(param) param[1]  # g(θ) = θ for posterior mean
tk_result <- tk_expectation(log_post, g_fn, mode_result, hessian_result)

# Compare with direct fit
fit <- tk_fit(data, "complete", pdf_exp, cdf_exp, prior_spec,
              initial_values = c(rate = 1), loss_function = "sel")

data.frame(
  TK_approximation = tk_result$expectation,
  Direct_fit = coef(fit),
  Posterior_mode = mode_result$mode
)
##      TK_approximation Direct_fit Posterior_mode
## rate         1.862275   1.862275       1.777306

Connection to Loss Functions

The TK approximation framework naturally extends to various Bayesian loss functions through appropriate choice of \(g(\theta)\):

Squared Error Loss (Posterior Mean)

\[g(\theta) = \theta\]

\[\hat{\theta}_{SEL} = E[\theta | x]\]

LINEX Loss

\[g(\theta) = \exp(-c\theta)\]

\[\hat{\theta}_{LINEX} = -\frac{1}{c} \log E[\exp(-c\theta) | x]\]

General Entropy Loss

\[g(\theta) = \theta^{-q}\]

\[\hat{\theta}_{GEL} = [E(\theta^{-q} | x)]^{-1/q}\]

Precautionary Loss

\[g(\theta) = \theta^2\]

\[\hat{\theta}_{Precautionary} = \sqrt{E(\theta^2 | x)}\]

Weighted Squared Error Loss

\[g(\theta) = \theta^{-1}\]

\[\hat{\theta}_{WSEL} = \frac{1}{E(\theta^{-1} | x)}\]

Numerical Considerations

Optimization

TKApprox supports multiple optimization methods: - BFGS: Quasi-Newton method (default) - L-BFGS-B: BFGS with box constraints - Nelder-Mead: Simplex method - nlminb: R’s general-purpose optimizer - maxLik: Maximum likelihood package - trust: Trust region methods

Automatic fallback is implemented if the primary method fails.

Numerical Differentiation

The package uses numDeriv for numerical differentiation: - Richardson extrapolation: Default, high accuracy - Simple finite differences: Faster but less accurate

Users can optionally provide analytic derivatives for improved accuracy and speed.

Numerical Stability

Several safeguards are implemented: - Checking for positive definite Hessians - Handling overflow/underflow in likelihood evaluation - Detecting NaN/Inf propagation - Warning on failed optimizations - Alternative optimizer fallback

Comparison with Other Methods

vs. MCMC

Aspect TK Approximation MCMC
Speed Fast Slow
Deterministic Yes No
Multimodal Limited Handles well
Small samples Less accurate Accurate
Implementation Simple Complex
Reproducibility Perfect Requires seed

vs. Variational Inference

Aspect TK Approximation VI
Accuracy High (large n) Variable
Speed Fast Fast
Theoretical guarantees Asymptotic Optimization-based
Implementation Simple Complex

vs. Importance Sampling

Aspect TK Approximation IS
Speed Fast Variable
Deterministic Yes No
Tuning required Minimal High
High dimensions Good Poor

References

  1. Tierney, L., & Kadane, J. B. (1986). Accurate approximations for posterior moments and marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(393), 82-86.

  2. Kass, R. E., & Vos, P. W. (1997). Geometrical foundations of asymptotic inference. John Wiley & Sons.

  3. Gelman, A., et al. (2013). Bayesian Data Analysis (3rd ed.). CRC Press.

Next Steps

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.