The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
To understand the features of the avar
package, we first
illustrate with a simulated data of sample size \(n = 10^5\) coming from a White Noise (WN)
plus Random Walk (RW) model. The corresponding (maximum-overlap) Allan
Variance representation is given in the following figure:
set.seed(2710)
# Simulate data
n = 1e5
data = rnorm(n, 0, 0.01) + cumsum(rnorm(n, 0, 3.162278e-05))
# Compute the Maximum-Overlap Allan Variance
allan_variance = avar(data, type = "mo")
# Log-Log representation of the Allan Variance
plot(allan_variance)
Based on this graph, it is possible to detect the models underlying the simulated data. Indeed, we can see that our model should include a WN process when considering the first 7 scales and a RW process when considering the last 3 scales. Therefore, using these scales we can make use of the traditional “Allan Variance slope method” to estimate the parameters of these two processes.
# Specify the scale at which we want to fit the WN and RW processes
wn = 1:7
rw = 13:15
# Compute the Allan Variance Linear Regression Estimator (AVLR)
fit = avlr(allan_variance, wn = wn, rw = rw)
fit
#>
#> Estimates:
#> Value
#> WN 1.007431e-02
#> RW 1.358511e-05
Now that we have computed the parameters of interest, we can visually
check if the chosen latent model fits the data at hand well. To do so we
can simply use the plot
function and, if we would like to
observe how the individual processes contribute to the overall fit, we
can set the parameter decomp = TRUE
.
As we can see, the model fits the data well. Therefore, we are going
to compute the confidence intervals for these parameters by specifiying
the option ci = TRUE
. These confidence intervals are
computed via parametric bootstrap for which the number of replications
can be defined through the parameter B
.
# AVLR estimator with 95% confidence intervals
fit_ci = avlr(allan_variance, wn = 1:7, rw = 13:15, ci = TRUE, B = 100)
fit_ci$ci
#> $mu
#> [1] 0.0100782190 0.0000121613
#>
#> $ci
#> [,1] [,2]
#> [1,] 1.005670e-02 1.008411e-02
#> [2,] 1.392184e-05 1.609601e-05
#>
#> $sd
#> [1] 5.526008e-05 4.383085e-06
We can further illustrate the features of the avar
package using the Allan variance computed based on real IMU data.
Specifically, we consider the Allan variance of IMU data collected from
a navchip sensor, i.e. navchip_av
, whose sample size is
about \(n = 3 \cdot 10^6\). The Allan
variance representation corresponding to this dataset is given in the
following figure:
Based on the graph, we can see that for the gyroscope components, the underlying model should include a Quantization Noise (QN) for the first 4 scales, a WN for the 6th to 8th scales, and a RW for the 10th to 13th scales. Similarly for the accelerometer components, the underlying model should include a WN for the first 6 scales and a RW for the 14th to 16th scales. Therefore, we can estimate the underlying model with the following:
fit2 = avlr(navchip_av, qn_gyro = 1:4, wn_gyro = 6:8, rw_gyro = 10:13,
wn_acc = 1:6, rw_acc = 14:16)
fit2
#>
#> Estimates for gyroscopes:
#> Value
#> WN 5.945877e-05
#> QN 7.208553e-06
#> RW 3.062325e-05
#>
#> Estimates for accelerometers:
#> Value
#> WN 5.233402e-04
#> RW 6.422082e-05
And we can visualize to check if the estimated underlying model fits
the data well simply with the plot
function.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.