The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
Robson et al. (2017) elicited public preferences for health inequality aversion in England using a questionnaire. Their central estimate was η ≈ 1, with a range of 0.1 to 4.8 across the sample.
NICE (2025) does not mandate a specific η but expects sensitivity analysis across a range including 0, 1, and higher values.
health <- c(52.1, 56.3, 59.8, 63.2, 66.8)
weights <- rep(0.2, 5)
# eta = 0: no inequality aversion (arithmetic mean)
calc_ede(health, weights, eta = 0)
#> [1] 59.64
# eta = 1: moderate aversion (geometric mean)
calc_ede(health, weights, eta = 1)
#> [1] 59.41665
# eta = 5: strong aversion
calc_ede(health, weights, eta = 5)
#> [1] 58.51938profile <- calc_ede_profile(health, weights, eta_range = seq(0, 10, 0.1))
library(ggplot2)
ggplot(profile, aes(eta, ede)) +
geom_line(colour = "steelblue", linewidth = 1) +
labs(x = expression(eta), y = "EDE (years)",
title = "EDE Profile") +
theme_minimal()Robson M et al. (2017). Health Economics 26(10): 1328-1334. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3386
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Social welfare decomposition