The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
dySEM
?lavaan
syntax for latent dyadic
modelsdySEM
Workflow at a GlancedySEM
is designed to be maximally useful if you are
following some best-practices for reproducibility when using R.
Namely, using a separate directory with an R Studio Project
(.Rproj
, see here if you are
new to using projects) will allow dySEM
to be more helpful,
by creating sub-folders for your scripts
and
output
where it will automatically save any scripts you
create, or any tables and/or figures of output that you create.
dySEM
will still do these things without the use of an R
Studio project, but all bets are off for where R Studio will attempt to
save them.
A typical dySEM
workflow is then as follows:
lavaan
You might also use optional dySEM
calculators after Step
3 to get some additional information.
These families of functions–Scrapers, Scripters, and Outputters, and Getters–are listed and described in the Reference
We now demonstrate a typical dySEM
workflow, using the
built-in DRES
data (Raposo, Impett, & Muise, 2020), in order to perform dyadic
confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). More elaborate and specific
vignettes are forthcoming to provide didactic materials for conducting
other sorts of dyadic data analyses via dySEM
.
We will use a subset of DRES
,
consisting of 121 dyadic couples’ ratings of relationship quality on 9
of the PRQC
indicators (1 = not at all, 7 = extremely; all
indicators positively keyed). Structural equation modeling (SEM)
programs like lavaan
require dyadic data to be in dyad
structure dataset, whereby each row contains the data for one dyad,
with separate columns for each observation (in this case, indicator
variables of latent relationship quality) made for each member of the
dyad. We may eventually build in data-transformation functions to go
from various data structures to a dyad structure, but for now,
we recommend tidyr::pivot_wider
or the tools provided by Ledermann & Kenny
(2014)
Like many real-world analytic contexts, DRES
contains a number of other variables that we aren’t interested in
modeling at this time (specifically, 5 indicators of sexual satisfaction
from the GMSEX
for each dyad member). This will not be a problem for
dySEM
.
Our data set therefore results in a tibble that is 121 (# of couples) x 28 ((9 PRQC items + 5 GMSEX items) x 2 (# of dyad members)):
DRES
#> # A tibble: 121 × 28
#> PRQC_1.1 PRQC_2.1 PRQC_3.1 PRQC_4.1 PRQC_5.1 PRQC_6.1 PRQC_7.1 PRQC_8.1
#> <int> <int> <int> <int> <int> <int> <int> <int>
#> 1 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 5
#> 2 6 6 6 7 7 6 5 5
#> 3 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6
#> 4 6 6 6 7 7 6 5 6
#> 5 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 6
#> 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 6 5
#> 7 7 6 7 6 6 6 5 6
#> 8 6 7 7 7 7 6 5 6
#> 9 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6
#> 10 6 6 6 7 7 7 4 4
#> # ℹ 111 more rows
#> # ℹ 20 more variables: PRQC_9.1 <int>, PRQC_1.2 <int>, PRQC_2.2 <int>,
#> # PRQC_3.2 <int>, PRQC_4.2 <int>, PRQC_5.2 <int>, PRQC_6.2 <int>,
#> # PRQC_7.2 <int>, PRQC_8.2 <int>, PRQC_9.2 <int>, sexsat1.1 <int>,
#> # sexsat2.1 <int>, sexsat3.1 <int>, sexsat4.1 <int>, sexsat5.1 <int>,
#> # sexsat1.2 <int>, sexsat2.2 <int>, sexsat3.2 <int>, sexsat4.2 <int>,
#> # sexsat5.2 <int>
The first step in a typical dySEM
workflow is to
scrape the indicator variables that are to feature in
your latent dyadic model. The scraping functions in dySEM
accomplish this by making an important but reasonable (in most cases)
assumptions about how the useR has named their indicator variables.
Specifically:
Indicator variables of a latent variable will be named in a highly repetitious manner, distinguished by partner using two numbers or characters
The dySEM
scrapers consider appropriately repetitiously
named indicators as consisting of at least three distinct elements:
stem, item, and
partner. For longitudinal designs, a fourth
element–time is also considered to be part of the
repetitious structure of variable names, but we cover longitudinal
variable-scraping in a separate vignette. delimiter
characters (e.g., “.”, “_“) are commonly–but not always–used to separate
some/all of these elements.
TO DO: MAKE THIS SIMPLER AND START WITH VISUALS AT THIS POINT
dySEM
scrapers largely function by asking you to specify
in what order the elements of variable names are ordered. For example: *
x_order = "sip"
would scrape variable names according to a
stem –> item –>
partner order (e.g., PRQC)
dySEM
ScrapersThe scrapeVarCross
function is your dySEM
scraper for cross-sectional dyadic data. It can accommodate scraping
indicators for models featuring one latent variable (e.g., as in our
dyadic CFA), as well as bivariate latent variable models, such as the
Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM). We cover scraping and
scripting of these bivariate models in other vignettes.
We first supply our data frame, DRES
. We want to extract
our PRQC indicators, which have the following properties:
Feeding this information to scrapeVarCross
is quite
straightforward:
dvn <- scrapeVarCross(DRES, x_order = "sip", x_stem = "PRQC", x_delim1="_",x_delim2=".", distinguish_1="1", distinguish_2="2")
Before looking at what scrapeVarCross
returns, you may
be wondering:
The answer to 1. is that Item number is
automatically captured “behind the scenes” by
scrapeVarCross
. Specifically, scrapeVarCross
searches for (and then captures) any variable names containing your stem
and any digit(s) (using a regular expression).
The answer to 2. is that you would simply omit the
x_delim1
and/or x_delim2
arguments–by default,
scrapeVarCross
will create variable names from
S I and P without any
separating delimiters, unless you declare a character in one/both
delimiter arguments.
scrapeVarCross
returns a generic list (which I refer to
as a dvn
for a list of “dyad variable names”) consisting of
6 (or 9, if scraping for a bivariate model) elements:
This might not seem like much, but the list returned by
scrapeVarCross
contains all the information needed
to automate the scripting of lavaan
syntax for virtually
any dyadic SEM that you can imagine.
The script...()
TODO: CREATE/LINK to
family in Reference on pkgdown site: family of functions in
dySEM
simplify the process of accurately and reproducibly
scripting dyadic SEMs to a singleton line of R code.
Each Scripter function is a wrapper for a series of
Helper functions (see scriptHelpers.R
if you are interested) that snatch the information about the indicators
they need from a saved dvn
object and combine it with other
text to write the lavaan
syntax for a particular part of
the measurement (e.g., factor loadings, item intercepts) or structural
(e.g., regression slopes, factor means) portion of your model.
Scripter functions like scriptCFA
typically require only three arguments to be specified:
dvn
object (e.g., from scrapeVarCross
)
to be used to script the modelscriptAPIM
have
you input two names)If you plan on scripting multiple models, I recommend that you name
the output of Scripters
to include information about the
latent variable’s name (from 2.) and model (from 3.). For example, if we
were to use scriptCFA
to generate scripts for an
indistinguishable CFA (i.e., both imposing dyadic invariance and
equality of latent variances and means between partners [the default
options for the constr_dy_meas and constr_dy_struct arguments]) of the
PRQC items we scraped, we could specify
scriptCFA
returns to your environment an (ugly, to the
human-eyes) character object consisting of the lavaan
syntax corresponding to the model that matches the Scripter
function (i.e., in this case a CFA) and input for the model
argument (i.e., configurally invariant).
Meanwhile, behind the scenes, scriptCFA
has created a
folder in your working directory called “scripts”, and has stored a .txt
file containing the (less-ugly, to the human eyes) lavaan
syntax for your model. The file will be named as a combination of your
lvname
and model
arguments.
We think this syntax-exporting-.txt feature serves three important purposes:
lavaan
. For
example, our Scripters
manually specify (and label) the
estimation of certain parameters that would already be estimated by
default, but this way you can learn how differences in model
specification (e.g., changing to a different level of invariance)
impacts the lavaan
syntax. And…model = "intercepts
, and manually freeing only those that
are appreciably different).The modeling efficiency and accuracy gained via dySEM
’s
automated scripting may already be apparent, but becomes painfully
obvious once you leverage dySEM
to quickly script a
sequence of competing models (e.g., from configural invariance CFA –>
fully indistinguishable CFA)
qual.res.script <- scriptCFA(dvn, lvname = "Quality", constr_dy_meas = c("loadings", "intercepts", "residuals"), constr_dy_struct = c("none"))
qual.int.script <- scriptCFA(dvn, lvname = "Quality", constr_dy_meas = c("loadings", "intercepts"), constr_dy_struct = c("none"))
qual.load.script <- scriptCFA(dvn, lvname = "Quality", constr_dy_meas = c("loadings"), constr_dy_struct = c("none"))
qual.config.script <- scriptCFA(dvn, lvname = "Quality", constr_dy_meas = c("none"), constr_dy_struct = c("none"))
The scripting of longitudinal dyadic SEM models is not yet supported
by dySEM
, but we hope to develop this functionality over
the Spring/Summer 2021.
By design, we have attempted to avoid functionality pertaining to
model-fitting and inspection in dySEM
: lavaan
does that perfectly well itself. We therefore strongly recommend that
you cultivate a command of lavaan
’s basic functionality
before delving too far with dySEM
–the package tutorial website
is a very good place to get started.
You can immediately pass any script(s) returned from a
dySEM
scripter (e.g., scriptCFA
) to your
intended lavaan
wrapper (we recommend cfa
–be
sure to disable any options that might fix parameters, as the scripter
has already taken care of manually specifying which parameters to fix or
estimate), with your preferred estimator and missing data treatment. For
example, with dyadic invariance testing, we recommend starting with the
most parsimonious model (an indistinguishable model), and gradually
relaxing constraints on different groups of parameters:
#Fit fully indistinguishable model
qual.ind.fit <- lavaan::cfa(qual.indist.script, data = DRES, std.lv = FALSE, auto.fix.first= FALSE, meanstructure = TRUE)
#Fit residual invariance model
qual.res.fit <- lavaan::cfa(qual.res.script, data = DRES, std.lv = FALSE, auto.fix.first= FALSE, meanstructure = TRUE)
#Fit intercept invariance model
qual.int.fit <- lavaan::cfa(qual.int.script, data = DRES, std.lv = FALSE, auto.fix.first= FALSE, meanstructure = TRUE)
#Fit loading invariance model
qual.load.fit <- lavaan::cfa(qual.load.script, data = DRES, std.lv = FALSE, auto.fix.first= FALSE, meanstructure = TRUE)
#Fit configural invariance model
qual.config.fit <- lavaan::cfa(qual.config.script, data = DRES, std.lv = FALSE, auto.fix.first= FALSE, meanstructure = TRUE)
At this point, the full arsenal of lavaan
model-inspecting tools are at your disposal. Two that you will almost
certainly want to make use of are summary
and
anova
.
summary
will useful for printing model fit information
as well as parameter estimates and tests to your console. For
example:
anova
, meanwhile, will enable you to perform comparisons
of competing nested dyadic models. For example:
anova(qual.config.fit, qual.load.fit, qual.int.fit, qual.res.fit, qual.ind.fit)
#>
#> Chi-Squared Difference Test
#>
#> Df AIC BIC Chisq Chisq diff RMSEA Df diff Pr(>Chisq)
#> qual.config.fit 125 5102.8 5280.6 573.33
#> qual.load.fit 133 5096.5 5252.2 583.09 9.7565 0.042954 8 0.2825
#> qual.int.fit 141 5089.1 5222.5 591.66 8.5669 0.024403 8 0.3801
#> qual.res.fit 150 5083.5 5191.9 604.04 12.3872 0.056237 9 0.1924
#> qual.ind.fit 152 5081.4 5184.2 605.97 1.9264 0.000000 2 0.3817
You can learn about what other kinds of detail you can extract from a
fitted lavaan
model here.
dySEM
also contains functionality to help you quickly,
correctly, and reproducibly generate output from your fitted model(s),
in the forms of path diagrams and/or tables of statistical values. Path
diagram creation is supported via the semPlot
package’s semPaths
function, whereas table creation is
currently supported by the sjPlot
package’s tab_df
function, though users should be aware
that we are
considering a move to the gt
package for improved
tabling capacity.
The outputModel
function is currently
dySEM
’s all-purpose outputting function.
The useR must specify the dvn
of scraped variables used
to script the model and the type of model being outputted (e.g., “cfa”).
UseRs can specify whether they only want a path diagram or some table(s)
to be outputted (e.g., by setting either figure = FALSE
or
table = FALSE
), but by default both are created. UseRs can
specify a directory path to where they want their file(s) to be written
and saved (e.g., setting writeTo = "."
to save in the
current working directory). UseRs can further specify what kind of path
diagram (e.g., using standardized or unstandardized value) or tables
(e.g., featuring measurement- or structural-model parameter, or both)
are created.
Whatever options the useR specifies, outputModel
is
typically run without assigning its output to an object, as it’s mostly
to facilitate statistical reporting for scientific articles:
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.