The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
When users choose to estimate and evaluate ITR under cross-validation, the package implements Algorithm 1 from Imai and Li (2023) to estimate and evaluate ITR. For more information about Algorithm 1, please refer to the this page.
Instead of specifying the split_ratio argument, we
choose the number of folds (n_folds). We present an example
of estimating ITR with 3 folds cross-validation. In practice, we
recommend using 10 folds to get a more stable model performance.
| Input | R package input | Descriptions |
|---|---|---|
| Data \(\mathbf{Z}=\left\{\mathbf{X}_i, T_i, Y_i\right\}_{i=1}^n\) | treatment = treatment, form = user_formula, data
= star_data |
treatment is a character string specifying
the treatment variable in the data; form is a
formula specifying the outcome and covariates; and a dataframe
data |
| Machine learning algorithm \(F\) | algorithms = c("causal_forest") |
a character vector specifying the ML algorithms to be used |
| Evaluation metric \(\tau_f\) | PAPE, PAPD, AUPEC, GATE | By default |
| Number of folds \(K\) | n_folds = 3 |
n_folds is a numeric value indicating the
number of folds used for cross-validation |
| … | budget = 0.2 |
budget is a numeric value specifying the
maximum percentage of population that can be treated under the budget
constraint |
library(evalITR)
# estimate ITR
set.seed(2021)
fit_cv <- estimate_itr(
treatment = treatment,
form = user_formula,
data = star_data,
algorithms = c("causal_forest"),
budget = 0.2,
n_folds = 3)
#> Evaluate ITR with cross-validation ...The output will be an object that includes estimated evaluation metric \(\hat{\tau}_F\) and the estimated variance of \(\hat{\tau}_F\) for different metrics (PAPE, PAPD, AUPEC).
# evaluate ITR
est_cv <- evaluate_itr(fit_cv)
#> Cannot compute PAPDp
# summarize estimates
summary(est_cv)
#> -- PAPE ------------------------------------------------------------------------
#> estimate std.deviation algorithm statistic p.value
#> 1 0.49 0.65 causal_forest 0.76 0.45
#>
#> -- PAPEp -----------------------------------------------------------------------
#> estimate std.deviation algorithm statistic p.value
#> 1 3 0.77 causal_forest 3.9 8.8e-05
#>
#> -- PAPDp -----------------------------------------------------------------------
#> Cannot compute PAPDp
#>
#> -- AUPEC -----------------------------------------------------------------------
#> estimate std.deviation algorithm statistic p.value
#> 1 1.3 1.6 causal_forest 0.8 0.42
#>
#> -- GATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------
#> estimate std.deviation algorithm group statistic p.value upper lower
#> 1 -56 59 causal_forest 1 -0.95 0.34 59 -171
#> 2 32 67 causal_forest 2 0.48 0.63 163 -99
#> 3 16 59 causal_forest 3 0.27 0.79 131 -99
#> 4 10 76 causal_forest 4 0.14 0.89 159 -138
#> 5 16 98 causal_forest 5 0.16 0.87 209 -177These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.