The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
Computers are excellent are performing the same task over and over and over again. In order to ensure that it’s just the computer doing repetitive tasks (and not also the coder typing them out), most languages employ a type of operation called a loop. Loops come in two main flavors: definite and indefinite.
Definite loops are ones in which you specify exactly how many times a
certain process should happen. Just like in Forth, you specify these
loops with DO...LOOP
. Let’s look at an example:
fr> 5 0 DO ." Hello!" CR LOOP
Hello!
Hello!
Hello!
Hello!
Hello!
ok.
These types of loops have five main components:
END START DO xxx LOOP
. END
and
START
specify the ending and starting values for our loop
counter. Think of it like counting: we start at START
and
begin counting up to END
. For every number we count, we do
the stuff between DO
and LOOP
.
In this case, we’ve defined a loop with 5 0 DO ... LOOP
.
This means that we’ll start at 0 and count up to 5. At each value (0, 1,
2, 3, 4), we do the middle stuff, which in this case is printing
Hello!
. Note that we stop at END
without doing
the stuff again.
It’s often useful to be able to do stuff with the number we’re
currently at. For instance, what if we wanted to print out what number
we’re currently counting at before saying Hello!
? In this
case, we use the special word I
, which copies the current
value of the loop counter to the stack.
fr> 5 0 DO I . ." Hello!" CR LOOP
0 Hello!
1 Hello!
2 Hello!
3 Hello!
4 Hello!
ok.
The LOOP
command tells froth
to add 1 to
the loop counter. This means that you can use negative numbers and/or
fractions as loop limits:
fr> 0 -2 DO ." looping!" LOOP
looping! looping! ok.
fr> 3.5 0.5 DO ." fraction!" LOOP
fraction! fraction! fraction! ok.
Like with the examples in Chapter 1, you can make words that expect to find elements on the stack as input to a loop:
fr> : MULTIPLICATION ( n -- ) cr 11 1 do dup i * . loop drop ;
ok.
fr> 7 multiplication
7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 ok.
if...then
statements can be nested within loops to make
the computer do certain operations on certain loop iterations. For
example:
fr> 64 0 do i 8 mod 0= if cr then ." *" loop
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * ok.
This loop proceeds from 0 to 64. If the loop counter is equivalent to
a multiple of 8 (i 8 mod 0= if
), then it prints a newline.
Either way, it prints a star.
Just like with if...then
statements, we can also nest
loops. For example:
fr> : multip ( n -- ) cr 5 1 do dup i * . loop drop ;
ok.
fr> : table ( -- ) cr 5 1 do i multip loop ;
1 2 3 4
2 4 6 8
3 6 9 12
4 8 12 16 ok.
This produces a (small) multiplication table. If you change the loop limits, you can change how big the table is.
The built-in words I
copies the current loop counter to
the stack. If you wanted to had nested loops and wanted to access the
outer loop counter from an inner loop, J
copies that value
to the stack. K
performs a similar operation, but returns
the loop counter two levels up. For example:
fr> 2 0 DO 2 0 DO 2 0 DO I J K . . . CR LOOP LOOP LOOP
0 0 0
0 0 1
0 1 0
0 1 1
1 0 0
1 0 1
1 1 0
1 1 1
ok.
We have three nested loops. The outermost one executes twice,
counting from 0 to 2. The middle loop executes twice per outer
loop, counting from 2 to 4 each time. The inner loop executes twice
per middle loop, counting from 4 to 6 each time. In all, the outer loop
runs twice, the middle loop 4 times, and the inner loop 8 times. From
the innermost loop, we use I
to get the loop counter,
J
to get the second loop counter, and K
to get
the outermost loop counter.
We also don’t have to always increment the loop value by 1. Instead,
we can use the +LOOP
word, which expects a value on the
stack and increments the loop counter by that amount. For example, we
can modify our previous triple loop:
fr> 10 0 DO 4 0 DO 0 2 DO I J K . . . CR -1 +LOOP 2 +LOOP 5 +LOOP
0 0 2
0 0 1
0 0 0
0 2 2
0 2 1
0 2 0
5 0 2
5 0 1
5 0 0
5 2 2
5 2 1
5 2 0
ok.
Now the outermost loop iterates from 0 to 10 by 5
(10 0 DO ... 5 +LOOP
), the second loop iterates from 0 to 4
by 2 (4 0 DO ... 2 +LOOP
), and the innermost loop iterates
from 2 to 0 by -1 (0 2 DO ... -1 +LOOP
).
Do you see what’s changed? There’s one key difference between the
outer two loops and the inner loop of the previous example. The outer
loops iterate as long as they’re less than the end value, but
the inner loop iterates as long as its greater than or equal to
the end value. When you use a loop with a negative +LOOP
value, keep in mind that the loop will iterate an additional time
compared to the positive direction. For example,
5 0 DO ... 1 +LOOP
iterates 5 times, whereas
0 5 DO ... -1 +LOOP
iterates 6 times.
Indefinite loops keep going without a specified end point. These
loops use BEGIN...UNTIL
rather than DO...LOOP
.
The basic syntax is the same, except that UNTIL
will check
the stack for TRUE
. If it finds TRUE
, the loop
terminates, and otherwise execution jumps back to
BEGIN
.
fr> 0 BEGIN 1 + dup dup . 10 > UNTIL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ok.
Here we start with 0, then at each iteration of the loop we add 1 to
it. We then duplicate it twice, print one of the copies, and then let
UNTIL
check if the second copy is greater than 10. Once the
value becomes 11, 10 >
evaluates to TRUE
and the loop exits.
UNTIL
checks the condition at the end of the loop, but
what if we wanted to check at the beginning? BEGIN...UNTIL
loops will always execute at least once, but sometimes it’s preferable
to have a loop that doesn’t always execute.
For this, we have BEGIN...WHILE...REPEAT
loops.
WHILE
examines the stack similar to UNTIL
, and
skips immediately to REPEAT
if the condition is
TRUE
.
Let’s try the previous example again, using a WHILE
loop
instead:
fr> 0 BEGIN dup 10 < WHILE dup . 1 + REPEAT
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ok.
There are a few differences here. First, we’ve had to reverse the
comparison sign. This is because this loop continues while the
condition is true, whereas BEGIN...UNTIL
goes
until the loop is true.
In some particular cases, you need a loop that never ends. The
BEGIN...AGAIN
loop will run forever without terminating.
I’d include an example, but it would never stop running…
So in the absence of that, I’ll showcase use of
BEGIN...AGAIN
alongside another operator,
LEAVE
. LEAVE
exits the current loop
immediately. For example:
fr> 0 begin 1 + dup dup . 10 > if leave then again
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ok.
Normally the BEGIN...AGAIN
loop would go on forever.
However, in the middle we’re doing 10 > if leave then
.
This compares the current value on the stack to 10, and if it’s greater
than 10, we run leave
. As soon as the value on the stack
reaches 11, we execute leave
and the loop finishes.
DO ( end start -- )
: starts a definite loop from
start
to end
LOOP ( -- )
: increments the loop counter by 1+LOOP ( n -- )
: increments the loop counter by nI ( -- n )
: copies the current loop counter to the
stackJ ( -- n )
: copies the enclosing loop’s counter to the
stackK ( -- n )
: copies the enclosing loop’s enclosing
loop’s counter to the stackBEGIN ( -- )
: starts an indefinite loopAGAIN ( -- )
: returns to BEGIN
WHILE ( flag -- )
: if flag
, continue; else
jump to after REPEAT
REPEAT ( -- )
: returns to BEGIN
following
WHILE
LEAVE ( -- )
: leave the current loop immediatelyThese binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.