The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
The fuzzyjoin package is a variation on dplyr’s join operations that allows matching not just on values that match between columns, but on inexact matching. This allows matching on:
difference_inner_join)stringdist_inner_join)regex_inner_join)distance_inner_join)geo_inner_join)interval_inner_join)genome_inner_join)One relevant use case is for classifying freeform text data (such as survey responses) against a finite set of options.
The package also includes:
regex_, stringdist_,
difference_, distance_, geo_, and
interval_, variations for the six dplyr “join” operations-
for example,
regex_inner_join (include only rows with matches in
each)regex_left_join (include all rows of left table)regex_right_join (include all rows of right table)regex_full_join (include all rows in each table)regex_semi_join (filter left table for rows with
matches)regex_anti_join (filter left table for rows without
matches)fuzzy_join) that allows you to
define your own custom fuzzy matching function.distance_col argumentInstall from CRAN with:
install.packages("fuzzyjoin")You can also install the development version from GitHub using devtools:
devtools::install_github("dgrtwo/fuzzyjoin")stringdist_inner_join: Correcting misspellings against a
dictionaryOften you find yourself with a set of words that you want to combine with a “dictionary”- it could be a literal dictionary (as in this case) or a domain-specific category system. But you want to allow for small differences in spelling or punctuation.
The fuzzyjoin package comes with a set of common misspellings (from Wikipedia):
library(dplyr)
library(fuzzyjoin)
data(misspellings)
misspellings
#> # A tibble: 4,505 x 2
#> misspelling correct
#> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 abandonned abandoned
#> 2 aberation aberration
#> 3 abilties abilities
#> 4 abilty ability
#> 5 abondon abandon
#> 6 abbout about
#> 7 abotu about
#> 8 abouta about a
#> 9 aboutit about it
#> 10 aboutthe about the
#> # … with 4,495 more rows# use the dictionary of words from the qdapDictionaries package,
# which is based on the Nettalk corpus.
library(qdapDictionaries)
words <- tbl_df(DICTIONARY)
words
#> # A tibble: 20,137 x 2
#> word syllables
#> <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 hm 1
#> 2 hmm 1
#> 3 hmmm 1
#> 4 hmph 1
#> 5 mmhmm 2
#> 6 mmhm 2
#> 7 mm 1
#> 8 mmm 1
#> 9 mmmm 1
#> 10 pff 1
#> # … with 20,127 more rowsAs an example, we’ll pick 1000 of these words (you could try it on
all of them though), and use stringdist_inner_join to join
them against our dictionary.
set.seed(2016)
sub_misspellings <- misspellings %>%
sample_n(1000)joined <- sub_misspellings %>%
stringdist_inner_join(words, by = c(misspelling = "word"), max_dist = 1)By default, stringdist_inner_join uses optimal string
alignment (Damerau–Levenshtein distance), and we’re setting a maximum
distance of 1 for a join. Notice that they’ve been joined in cases where
misspelling is close to (but not equal to)
word:
joined
#> # A tibble: 728 x 4
#> misspelling correct word syllables
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 sould should could 1
#> 2 sould should should 1
#> 3 sould should sold 1
#> 4 sould should soul 1
#> 5 sould should sound 1
#> 6 sould should would 1
#> 7 fiels feels field 1
#> 8 fiels feels fils 1
#> 9 conscent consent consent 2
#> 10 fleed freed bleed 1
#> # … with 718 more rowsNote that there are some redundancies; words that could be multiple items in the dictionary. These end up with one row per “guess” in the output. How many words did we classify?
joined %>%
count(misspelling, correct)
#> # A tibble: 455 x 3
#> misspelling correct n
#> <chr> <chr> <int>
#> 1 abritrary arbitrary 1
#> 2 accademic academic 1
#> 3 accension ascension 2
#> 4 accessable accessible 1
#> 5 accidant accident 1
#> 6 accidentaly accidentally 1
#> 7 accordeon accordion 1
#> 8 addopt adopt 1
#> 9 addtional additional 1
#> 10 admendment amendment 1
#> # … with 445 more rowsSo we found a match in the dictionary for about half of the misspellings. In how many of the ones we classified did we get at least one of our guesses right?
which_correct <- joined %>%
group_by(misspelling, correct) %>%
summarize(guesses = n(), one_correct = any(correct == word))
which_correct
#> # A tibble: 455 x 4
#> # Groups: misspelling [444]
#> misspelling correct guesses one_correct
#> <chr> <chr> <int> <lgl>
#> 1 abritrary arbitrary 1 TRUE
#> 2 accademic academic 1 TRUE
#> 3 accension ascension 2 TRUE
#> 4 accessable accessible 1 TRUE
#> 5 accidant accident 1 TRUE
#> 6 accidentaly accidentally 1 FALSE
#> 7 accordeon accordion 1 TRUE
#> 8 addopt adopt 1 TRUE
#> 9 addtional additional 1 TRUE
#> 10 admendment amendment 1 TRUE
#> # … with 445 more rows
# percentage of guesses getting at least one right
mean(which_correct$one_correct)
#> [1] 0.8527473
# number uniquely correct (out of the original 1000)
sum(which_correct$guesses == 1 & which_correct$one_correct)
#> [1] 294Not bad.
If you wanted to include the distance as a column in your output, you
can use the distance_col argument. For example, we may be
interested in how many words were two letters apart.
joined_dists <- sub_misspellings %>%
stringdist_inner_join(words, by = c(misspelling = "word"), max_dist = 2,
distance_col = "distance")
joined_dists
#> # A tibble: 7,427 x 5
#> misspelling correct word syllables distance
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 charactors characters character 3 2
#> 2 charactors characters charactery 4 2
#> 3 sould should auld 1 2
#> 4 sould should bold 1 2
#> 5 sould should bound 1 2
#> 6 sould should cold 1 2
#> 7 sould should could 1 1
#> 8 sould should fold 1 2
#> 9 sould should foul 1 2
#> 10 sould should found 1 2
#> # … with 7,417 more rowsNote the extra distance column, which in this case will
always be less than or equal to 2. We could then pick the closest match
for each, and examine how many of our closest matches were 1 or 2
away:
closest <- joined_dists %>%
group_by(misspelling) %>%
top_n(1, desc(distance)) %>%
ungroup()
closest
#> # A tibble: 1,437 x 5
#> misspelling correct word syllables distance
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 charactors characters character 3 2
#> 2 charactors characters charactery 4 2
#> 3 sould should could 1 1
#> 4 sould should should 1 1
#> 5 sould should sold 1 1
#> 6 sould should soul 1 1
#> 7 sould should sound 1 1
#> 8 sould should would 1 1
#> 9 incorportaed incorporated incorporate 4 2
#> 10 awya away aa 2 2
#> # … with 1,427 more rows
closest %>%
count(distance)
#> # A tibble: 3 x 2
#> distance n
#> <dbl> <int>
#> 1 0 1
#> 2 1 725
#> 3 2 711Note that stringdist_inner_join is not the only function
we can use. If we’re interested in including the words that we
couldn’t classify, we could have use
stringdist_left_join:
left_joined <- sub_misspellings %>%
stringdist_left_join(words, by = c(misspelling = "word"), max_dist = 1)
left_joined
#> # A tibble: 1,273 x 4
#> misspelling correct word syllables
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 charactors characters <NA> NA
#> 2 Brasillian Brazilian <NA> NA
#> 3 sould should could 1
#> 4 sould should should 1
#> 5 sould should sold 1
#> 6 sould should soul 1
#> 7 sould should sound 1
#> 8 sould should would 1
#> 9 belligerant belligerent <NA> NA
#> 10 incorportaed incorporated <NA> NA
#> # … with 1,263 more rows
left_joined %>%
filter(is.na(word))
#> # A tibble: 545 x 4
#> misspelling correct word syllables
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 charactors characters <NA> NA
#> 2 Brasillian Brazilian <NA> NA
#> 3 belligerant belligerent <NA> NA
#> 4 incorportaed incorporated <NA> NA
#> 5 awya away <NA> NA
#> 6 occuring occurring <NA> NA
#> 7 surveilence surveillance <NA> NA
#> 8 abondoned abandoned <NA> NA
#> 9 alledges alleges <NA> NA
#> 10 deliberatly deliberately <NA> NA
#> # … with 535 more rows(To get just the ones without matches immediately, we could
have used stringdist_anti_join). If we increase our
distance threshold, we’ll increase the fraction with a correct guess,
but also get more false positive guesses:
left_joined2 <- sub_misspellings %>%
stringdist_left_join(words, by = c(misspelling = "word"), max_dist = 2)
left_joined2
#> # A tibble: 7,691 x 4
#> misspelling correct word syllables
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 charactors characters character 3
#> 2 charactors characters charactery 4
#> 3 Brasillian Brazilian <NA> NA
#> 4 sould should auld 1
#> 5 sould should bold 1
#> 6 sould should bound 1
#> 7 sould should cold 1
#> 8 sould should could 1
#> 9 sould should fold 1
#> 10 sould should foul 1
#> # … with 7,681 more rows
left_joined2 %>%
filter(is.na(word))
#> # A tibble: 264 x 4
#> misspelling correct word syllables
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 Brasillian Brazilian <NA> NA
#> 2 belligerant belligerent <NA> NA
#> 3 occuring occurring <NA> NA
#> 4 abondoned abandoned <NA> NA
#> 5 correponding corresponding <NA> NA
#> 6 archeaologist archaeologist <NA> NA
#> 7 emmediately immediately <NA> NA
#> 8 possessess possesses <NA> NA
#> 9 unahppy unhappy <NA> NA
#> 10 Guilio Giulio <NA> NA
#> # … with 254 more rowsMost of the missing words here simply aren’t in our dictionary.
You can try other distance thresholds, other dictionaries, and other distance metrics (see [stringdist-metrics] for more). This function is especially useful on a domain-specific dataset, such as free-form survey input that is likely to be close to one of a handful of responses.
regex_inner_join: Classifying text based on regular
expressionsConsider the book Pride and Prejudice, by Jane Austen, which we can access through the janeaustenr package.
We could split the books up into “passages” of 50 lines each.
library(dplyr)
library(stringr)
library(janeaustenr)
passages <- tibble(text = prideprejudice) %>%
group_by(passage = 1 + row_number() %/% 50) %>%
summarize(text = paste(text, collapse = " "))
passages
#> # A tibble: 261 x 2
#> passage text
#> <dbl> <chr>
#> 1 1 "PRIDE AND PREJUDICE By Jane Austen Chapter 1 It is a tru…
#> 2 2 "\"How so? How can it affect them?\" \"My dear Mr. Bennet,\" r…
#> 3 3 "are my old friends. I have heard you mention them with conside…
#> 4 4 "herself, began scolding one of her daughters. \"Don't keep co…
#> 5 5 " The astonishment of the ladies was just what he wished; that …
#> 6 6 "married, I shall have nothing to wish for.\" In a few days Mr…
#> 7 7 "introduced to any other lady, and spent the rest of the evenin…
#> 8 8 "party. Mr. Bingley had danced with her twice, and she had been…
#> 9 9 " Chapter 4 When Jane and Elizabeth were alone, the former, …
#> 10 10 Elizabeth listened in silence, but was not convinced; their beh…
#> # … with 251 more rowsSuppose we wanted to divide the passages based on which character’s name is mentioned in each. Character’s names may differ in how they are presented, so we construct a regular expression for each and pair it with that character’s name.
characters <- readr::read_csv(
"character,character_regex
Elizabeth,Elizabeth
Darcy,Darcy
Mr. Bennet,Mr. Bennet
Mrs. Bennet,Mrs. Bennet
Jane,Jane
Mary,Mary
Lydia,Lydia
Kitty,Kitty
Wickham,Wickham
Mr. Collins,Collins
Lady Catherine de Bourgh,de Bourgh
Mr. Gardiner,Mr. Gardiner
Mrs. Gardiner,Mrs. Gardiner
Charlotte Lucas,(Charlotte|Lucas)
")Notice that for each character, we’ve defined a regular expression (sometimes allowing ambiguity, sometimes not) for detecting their name. Suppose we want to “classify” passages based on whether this regex is present.
With fuzzyjoin’s regex_inner_join function, we do:
character_passages <- passages %>%
regex_inner_join(characters, by = c(text = "character_regex"))This combines the two data frames based on cases where the
passages$text column is matched by the
characters$character_regex column. (Note that the dataset
with the text column must always come first). This results in:
character_passages %>%
select(passage, character, text)
#> # A tibble: 1,126 x 3
#> passage character text
#> <dbl> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 1 Mr. Bennet "PRIDE AND PREJUDICE By Jane Austen Chapter …
#> 2 1 Jane "PRIDE AND PREJUDICE By Jane Austen Chapter …
#> 3 2 Mr. Bennet "\"How so? How can it affect them?\" \"My dear …
#> 4 2 Jane "\"How so? How can it affect them?\" \"My dear …
#> 5 2 Lydia "\"How so? How can it affect them?\" \"My dear …
#> 6 2 Charlotte Luc… "\"How so? How can it affect them?\" \"My dear …
#> 7 3 Elizabeth "are my old friends. I have heard you mention th…
#> 8 3 Mr. Bennet "are my old friends. I have heard you mention th…
#> 9 3 Mrs. Bennet "are my old friends. I have heard you mention th…
#> 10 4 Mr. Bennet "herself, began scolding one of her daughters. …
#> # … with 1,116 more rowsThis shows that Mr. Bennet’s name appears in passages 1, 2, 4, and 6, while Charlotte Lucas’s appears in 3. Notice that having fuzzy-joined the datasets, some passages will end up duplicated (those with multiple names in them), while it’s possible others will be missing entirely (those without names).
We could ask which characters are mentioned in the most passages:
character_passages %>%
count(character, sort = TRUE)
#> # A tibble: 14 x 2
#> character n
#> <chr> <int>
#> 1 Elizabeth 227
#> 2 Darcy 159
#> 3 Jane 134
#> 4 Mrs. Bennet 89
#> 5 Wickham 89
#> 6 Lydia 79
#> 7 Mr. Collins 75
#> 8 Charlotte Lucas 68
#> 9 Mr. Bennet 55
#> 10 Kitty 42
#> 11 Mrs. Gardiner 35
#> 12 Lady Catherine de Bourgh 25
#> 13 Mr. Gardiner 25
#> 14 Mary 24The data is also well suited to discover which characters appear in scenes together, and to cluster them to find groupings of characters (like in this analysis).
passage_character_matrix <- character_passages %>%
group_by(passage) %>%
filter(n() > 1) %>%
reshape2::acast(character ~ passage, fun.aggregate = length, fill = 0)
passage_character_matrix <- passage_character_matrix / rowSums(passage_character_matrix)
h <- hclust(dist(passage_character_matrix, method = "manhattan"))
plot(h)
Other options for further analysis of this fuzzy-joined dataset include doing sentiment analysis on text surrounding each character’s name, similar to Julia Silge’s analysis here.
A few things I’d like to work on:
Shortcuts on string distance matching: If two
strings are more than 1 character apart in length, the method is
osa, and max_dist is 1, you don’t even need to
compare them.
More examples: I’ve used this package in other powerful ways, but on proprietary data. I’m interested in ideas for use cases that can be provided as vignettes.
Please note that this project is released with a Contributor Code of Conduct. By participating in this project you agree to abide by its terms.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.