The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
An implementation of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) generalized consensus estimators used to assign the reference value in a key comparison exercise. This can also be applied to any interlaboratory study. Given a set of different sources, primary laboratories or measurement methods this package provides an evaluation of the variance components according to the selected statistical method for consensus building. It also implements the comparison among different consensus builders and evaluates the participating method or sources against the consensus reference value. Based on a diverse set of references, DerSimonian-Laird (1986) <doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2>, for a complete list of references look at the reference section in the package documentation.
Version: | 0.3.2 |
Depends: | R (≥ 3.4), graphics (≥ 3.4), stats (≥ 3.4), MASS (≥ 7.0), utils (≥ 3.4), rjags (≥ 4-8), coda (≥ 0.13) |
Published: | 2022-11-04 |
DOI: | 10.32614/CRAN.package.gconsensus |
Author: | Hugo Gasca-Aragon |
Maintainer: | Hugo Gasca-Aragon <hugo_gasca_aragon at hotmail.com> |
License: | GPL (≥ 3) |
NeedsCompilation: | no |
CRAN checks: | gconsensus results |
Reference manual: | gconsensus.pdf |
Package source: | gconsensus_0.3.2.tar.gz |
Windows binaries: | r-devel: gconsensus_0.3.2.zip, r-release: gconsensus_0.3.2.zip, r-oldrel: gconsensus_0.3.2.zip |
macOS binaries: | r-release (arm64): gconsensus_0.3.2.tgz, r-oldrel (arm64): gconsensus_0.3.2.tgz, r-release (x86_64): gconsensus_0.3.2.tgz, r-oldrel (x86_64): gconsensus_0.3.2.tgz |
Old sources: | gconsensus archive |
Please use the canonical form https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gconsensus to link to this page.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.