The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
Helske J, Helske S, Cooper M, Ynnerman A, Besancon L (2020). “Are You Sure You're Sure? - Effects of Visual Representation on the Cliff Effect in Statistical Inference.” arXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.07671.
Corresponding BibTeX entry:
@Article{, author = {Jouni Helske and Satu Helske and Matthew Cooper and Anders Ynnerman and Lonni Besancon}, title = {Are You Sure You're Sure? - Effects of Visual Representation on the Cliff Effect in Statistical Inference}, journal = {arXiv e-prints}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Common reporting styles of statistical results, such as confidence intervals (CI), are prone to dichotomous interpretations especially on null hypothesis testing frameworks, for example by claiming significant differences between drug treatment and placebo groups due to the non-overlapping CIs of the mean effects, while disregarding the magnitudes and absolute difference in the effect sizes. Techniques relying on the visual estimation of the strength of evidence have been recommended to limit such dichotomous interpretations but their effectiveness has been challenged. We ran two experiments to compare several visual representations of confidence intervals, and used a Bayesian multilevel model to estimate the effects of visualization on differences in subjective confidence of the results. Our results suggest that adding visual information to standard CI representation can decrease the sudden drop around p-value 0.05 compared to standard CIs and textual representation of CI with p-values. All data analysis and scripts are available online: https://github.com/helske/statvis.}, url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.07671}, pubtype = {2}, date = {2020}, }
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.