The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.

Introduction to gllvm Part 2: Species correlations

Jenni Niku

2023-09-18

Introduction to gllvm

R package gllvm

R package gllvm fits Generalized linear latent variable models (GLLVM) for multivariate data¹.
Developed by J. Niku, W.Brooks, R. Herliansyah, F.K.C. Hui, S. Taskinen, D.I. Warton, B. van der Veen.
The package available in
- GitHub: https://github.com/JenniNiku/gllvm
- CRAN: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gllvm
Package installation:

# From CRAN
install.packages(gllvm)
# OR
# From GitHub using devtools package's function install_github
devtools::install_github("JenniNiku/gllvm")

Problems?

gllvm package depends on R packages TMB and mvabund, try to install these first.

GLLVMs are computationally intensive to fit due the integral in log-likelihood.
gllvm package overcomes computational problems by applying closed form approximations to log-likelihood and using automatic differentiation in C++ to accelerate computation times (TMB²).
Estimation is performed using either variational approximation (VA³), extended variational approximation method (EVA⁴) or Laplace approximation (LA⁵) method implemented via R package TMB.
VA method is faster and more accurate than LA, but not applicable for all distributions and link functions.
Using gllvm we can fit
- GLLVM without covariates gives model-based ordination and biplots
- GLLVM with environmental and/or trait covariates for studying factors explaining species abundance
- Fourth corner models with latent variables for studying environmental-trait interactions
- GLLVM without latent variables fits basic multivariate GLMs
Additional tools: residuals, information criteria, confidence intervals, visualization.

Distributions

Response	Distribution	Method	Link
Counts	Poisson	VA/LA	log
	NB	VA/LA	log
	ZIP	VA/LA	log
	ZINB	VA/LA	log
Binary	Bernoulli	VA/LA	probit
		LA	logit
Ordinal	Ordinal	VA	probit
Normal	Gaussian	VA/LA	identity
Positive continuous	Gamma	VA/LA	log
Non-negative continuous	Exponential	VA/LA	log
Biomass	Tweedie	LA/EVA	log
Percent cover	beta	LA/EVA	probit/logit

Data input

Main function of the gllvm package is gllvm(), which can be used to fit GLLVMs for multivariate data with the most important arguments listed in the following:

gllvm(y = NULL, X = NULL, TR = NULL, family, num.lv = 2, 
 formula = NULL, method = "VA", row.eff = FALSE, n.init=1, starting.val ="res", ...)

y: matrix of abundances
X: matrix or data.frame of environmental variables
TR: matrix or data.frame of trait variables
family: distribution for responses
num.lv: number of latent variables
method: approximation used “VA” or “LA”
row.eff: type of row effects
n.init: number of random starting points for latent variables
starting.val: starting value method

library(gllvm)

Example: Spiders

Abundances of 12 hunting spider species measured as a count at 28 sites.
Six environmental variables measured at each site:
- soil.dry: Soil dry mass
- bare.sand: cover of bare sand
- fallen.leaves: cover of fallen leaves/twigs
- moss: cover of moss
- herb.layer: cover of herb layer
- reflection: reflection of the soil surface with a cloudless sky

Data fitting

Fit GLLVM with environmental variables \(g(E(y_{ij})) = \beta_{0j} + \boldsymbol{x}_i'\boldsymbol{\beta}_{j} + \boldsymbol{u}_i'\boldsymbol{\theta}_j\) using gllvm:

library(gllvm)
data("spider")
fitx <- gllvm(y = spider$abund, X=spider$x, family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 2)
fitx
## Call: 
## gllvm(y = spider$abund, X = spider$x, family = "negative.binomial", 
##     num.lv = 2)
## family: 
## [1] "negative.binomial"
## method: 
## [1] "VA"
## 
## log-likelihood:  -588.9186 
## Residual degrees of freedom:  217 
## AIC:  1415.837 
## AICc:  1548.06 
## BIC:  1870.074

Model selection

Number of latent variables is not necessarily clear beforehand when goal is not primarily in ordination, so information criteria can be used for model selection. For example, using Akaike information criterion:

X=spider$x
fitx1 <- gllvm(spider$abund, X, family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 1)
fitx2 <- gllvm(spider$abund, X, family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 2)
fitx3 <- gllvm(spider$abund, X, family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 3)
AIC(fitx1)
## [1] 1393.837
AIC(fitx2)
## [1] 1425.35
AIC(fitx3)
## [1] 1445.35

Residual analysis

Residual analysis can be used to assess the appropriateness of the fitted model (eg. in terms of mean-variance relationship). Can be performed using plot():

par(mfrow = c(1,2))
plot(fitx1, which = 1:2)

Exercises

E1. Load spider data from mvabund package and take a look at the dataset.

library(gllvm)
#Package **mvabund** is loaded with **gllvm** so just load with a function `data()`.
data("spider")
# more info: 
# ?spider

Show the answers.

Package mvabund is loaded with gllvm so just load with a function data().

# response matrix:
spider$abund
##       Alopacce Alopcune Alopfabr Arctlute Arctperi Auloalbi Pardlugu Pardmont
##  [1,]       25       10        0        0        0        4        0       60
##  [2,]        0        2        0        0        0       30        1        1
##  [3,]       15       20        2        2        0        9        1       29
##  [4,]        2        6        0        1        0       24        1        7
##  [5,]        1       20        0        2        0        9        1        2
##  [6,]        0        6        0        6        0        6        0       11
##  [7,]        2        7        0       12        0       16        1       30
##  [8,]        0       11        0        0        0        7       55        2
##  [9,]        1        1        0        0        0        0        0       26
## [10,]        3        0        1        0        0        0        0       22
## [11,]       15        1        2        0        0        1        0       95
## [12,]       16       13        0        0        0        0        0       96
## [13,]        3       43        1        2        0       18        1       24
## [14,]        0        2        0        1        0        4        3       14
## [15,]        0        0        0        0        0        0        6        0
## [16,]        0        3        0        0        0        0        6        0
## [17,]        0        0        0        0        0        0        2        0
## [18,]        0        1        0        0        0        0        5        0
## [19,]        0        1        0        0        0        0       12        0
## [20,]        0        2        0        0        0        0       13        0
## [21,]        0        1        0        0        0        0       16        1
## [22,]        7        0       16        0        4        0        0        2
## [23,]       17        0       15        0        7        0        2        6
## [24,]       11        0       20        0        5        0        0        3
## [25,]        9        1        9        0        0        2        1       11
## [26,]        3        0        6        0       18        0        0        0
## [27,]       29        0       11        0        4        0        0        1
## [28,]       15        0       14        0        1        0        0        6
##       Pardnigr Pardpull Trocterr Zoraspin
##  [1,]       12       45       57        4
##  [2,]       15       37       65        9
##  [3,]       18       45       66        1
##  [4,]       29       94       86       25
##  [5,]      135       76       91       17
##  [6,]       27       24       63       34
##  [7,]       89      105      118       16
##  [8,]        2        1       30        3
##  [9,]        1        1        2        0
## [10,]        0        0        1        0
## [11,]        0        1        4        0
## [12,]        1        8       13        0
## [13,]       53       72       97       22
## [14,]       15       72       94       32
## [15,]        0        0       25        3
## [16,]        2        0       28        4
## [17,]        0        0       23        2
## [18,]        0        0       25        0
## [19,]        1        0       22        3
## [20,]        0        0       22        2
## [21,]        0        1       18        2
## [22,]        0        0        1        0
## [23,]        0        0        1        0
## [24,]        0        0        0        0
## [25,]        6        0       16        6
## [26,]        0        0        1        0
## [27,]        0        0        0        0
## [28,]        0        0        2        0
# Environmental variables
spider$x
##    soil.dry bare.sand fallen.leaves   moss herb.layer reflection
## 1    2.3321    0.0000        0.0000 3.0445     4.4543     3.9120
## 2    3.0493    0.0000        1.7918 1.0986     4.5643     1.6094
## 3    2.5572    0.0000        0.0000 2.3979     4.6052     3.6889
## 4    2.6741    0.0000        0.0000 2.3979     4.6151     2.9957
## 5    3.0155    0.0000        0.0000 0.0000     4.6151     2.3026
## 6    3.3810    2.3979        3.4340 2.3979     3.4340     0.6931
## 7    3.1781    0.0000        0.0000 0.6931     4.6151     2.3026
## 8    2.6247    0.0000        4.2627 1.0986     3.4340     0.6931
## 9    2.4849    0.0000        0.0000 4.3307     3.2581     3.4012
## 10   2.1972    3.9318        0.0000 3.4340     3.0445     3.6889
## 11   2.2192    0.0000        0.0000 4.1109     3.7136     3.6889
## 12   2.2925    0.0000        0.0000 3.8286     4.0254     3.6889
## 13   3.5175    1.7918        1.7918 0.6931     4.5109     3.4012
## 14   3.0865    0.0000        0.0000 1.7918     4.5643     1.0986
## 15   3.2696    0.0000        4.3944 0.6931     3.0445     0.6931
## 16   3.0301    0.0000        4.6052 0.6931     0.6931     0.0000
## 17   3.3322    0.0000        4.4543 0.6931     3.0445     1.0986
## 18   3.1224    0.0000        4.3944 0.0000     3.0445     1.0986
## 19   2.9232    0.0000        4.5109 1.6094     1.6094     0.0000
## 20   3.1091    0.0000        4.5951 0.6931     0.6931     0.0000
## 21   2.9755    0.0000        4.5643 0.6931     1.7918     0.0000
## 22   1.2528    3.2581        0.0000 4.3307     0.6931     3.9120
## 23   1.1939    3.0445        0.0000 4.0254     3.2581     4.0943
## 24   1.6487    3.2581        0.0000 4.0254     3.0445     4.0073
## 25   1.8245    3.5835        0.0000 1.0986     4.1109     2.3026
## 26   0.9933    4.5109        0.0000 1.7918     1.7918     4.3820
## 27   0.9555    2.3979        0.0000 3.8286     3.4340     3.6889
## 28   0.9555    3.4340        0.0000 3.7136     3.4340     3.6889
# Plot data using boxplot:
boxplot(spider$abund)

E2. Fit GLLVM with two latent variables to spider data with a suitable distribution. Data consists of counts of spider species.

# Take a look at the function documentation for help: 
?gllvm

Show the answers.

2. Response variables in spider data are counts, so Poisson, negative binomial and zero inflated Poisson are possible. However, ZIP is implemented only with Laplace method, so it need to be noticed, that if models are fitted with different methods they can not be compared with information criteria. Let’s try just with a Poisson and NB. NOTE THAT the results may not be exactly the same as below, as the initial values for each model fit are slightly different, so the results may

# Fit a GLLVM to data
fitp <- gllvm(y=spider$abund, family = poisson(), num.lv = 2)
fitp
## Call: 
## gllvm(y = spider$abund, family = poisson(), num.lv = 2)
## family: 
## [1] "poisson"
## method: 
## [1] "VA"
## 
## log-likelihood:  -845.8277 
## Residual degrees of freedom:  301 
## AIC:  1761.655 
## AICc:  1770.055 
## BIC:  1895.254
fitnb <- gllvm(y=spider$abund, family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 2)
fitnb
## Call: 
## gllvm(y = spider$abund, family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 2)
## family: 
## [1] "negative.binomial"
## method: 
## [1] "VA"
## 
## log-likelihood:  -733.6806 
## Residual degrees of freedom:  289 
## AIC:  1561.361 
## AICc:  1577.028 
## BIC:  1740.765

Based on AIC, NB distribution suits better. How about residual analysis: NOTE THAT The package uses randomized quantile residuals so each time you plot the residuals, they look a little different.

# Fit a GLLVM to data
par(mfrow = c(1,2))
plot(fitp, which = 1:2)

plot(fitnb, which = 1:2)

You could do these comparisons with Laplace method as well, using the code below, and it would give the same conclusion that NB distribution suits best:

fitLAp <- gllvm(y=spider$abund, family = poisson(), method = "LA", num.lv = 2)
fitLAnb <- gllvm(y=spider$abund, family = "negative.binomial", method = "LA", num.lv = 2)
fitLAzip <- gllvm(y=spider$abund, family = "ZIP", method = "LA", num.lv = 2)
AIC(fitLAp)
AIC(fitLAnb)
AIC(fitLAzip)

GLLVM with two latent variables can be used as a model-based approach to unconstrained ordination, as considered at the first day of the workshop.

E3. Fit GLLVM with environmental variables soil.dry and reflection to the data with suitable number of latent variables.

Show the answers.

We can extract the two columns from the environmental variable matrix or define the model using formula.

# `soil.dry` and `reflection` are in columns 1 and 6
X <- spider$x[,c(1,6)]
fitx1 <- gllvm(spider$abund, X, family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 1)
fitx2 <- gllvm(spider$abund, X, family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 2)
fitx3 <- gllvm(spider$abund, X, family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 3)
AIC(fitx1)
## [1] 1449.428
AIC(fitx2)
## [1] 1471.428
AIC(fitx3)
## [1] 1506.451
# Or alternatively using formula:
fitx1 <- gllvm(spider$abund, spider$x, formula = ~soil.dry + reflection, family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 1)
fitx1
## Call: 
## gllvm(y = spider$abund, X = spider$x, formula = ~soil.dry + reflection, 
##     family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 1)
## family: 
## [1] "negative.binomial"
## method: 
## [1] "VA"
## 
## log-likelihood:  -664.7138 
## Residual degrees of freedom:  276 
## AIC:  1449.428 
## AICc:  1476.046 
## BIC:  1678.454

Model with one latent variable gave the lowest AIC value.

E4. Explore the model fit. Find the coefficients for environmental covariates.

Show the answers.

Estimated parameters can be obtained with coef() function. Confidence intervals for parameters are obtained with confint().

coef(fitx1)
## $Species.scores
##                   LV1
## Alopacce 1.000000e+00
## Alopcune 1.286715e+00
## Alopfabr 4.410752e-01
## Arctlute 2.261569e+00
## Arctperi 3.236902e-07
## Auloalbi 2.499151e+00
## Pardlugu 3.974207e-01
## Pardmont 9.559481e-01
## Pardnigr 2.566314e+00
## Pardpull 2.528325e+00
## Trocterr 9.659148e-01
## Zoraspin 1.751412e+00
## 
## $sigma.lv
##       LV1 
## 0.8536381 
## 
## $Intercept
##   Alopacce   Alopcune   Alopfabr   Arctlute   Arctperi   Auloalbi   Pardlugu 
##  -3.009461  -7.407015   2.078134 -21.475462  -7.919460 -12.966531   4.567866 
##   Pardmont   Pardnigr   Pardpull   Trocterr   Zoraspin 
##  -6.091019 -14.644236 -16.455489  -3.711573  -9.215034 
## 
## $Xcoef
##            soil.dry reflection
## Alopacce -0.3441060  1.5943262
## Alopcune  2.6111104  0.6246532
## Alopfabr -1.8669681  0.7467644
## Arctlute  6.3215994  0.8205912
## Arctperi -1.7567138  2.8890762
## Auloalbi  4.1813972  0.6831463
## Pardlugu -0.5453219 -1.2605150
## Pardmont  1.7924537  1.4691347
## Pardnigr  4.9041830  0.8601458
## Pardpull  5.3496432  1.2822836
## Trocterr  2.3357726  0.2234482
## Zoraspin  3.5554592  0.1198072
## 
## $inv.phi
##     Alopacce     Alopcune     Alopfabr     Arctlute     Arctperi     Auloalbi 
## 9.379320e+00 1.699533e+00 1.577633e+00 1.064240e+00 1.629747e+07 1.511543e+00 
##     Pardlugu     Pardmont     Pardnigr     Pardpull     Trocterr     Zoraspin 
## 1.543692e+00 9.784559e-01 2.517855e+00 2.339480e+00 1.471002e+01 3.625230e+00 
## 
## $phi
##     Alopacce     Alopcune     Alopfabr     Arctlute     Arctperi     Auloalbi 
## 1.066175e-01 5.883970e-01 6.338608e-01 9.396375e-01 6.135922e-08 6.615756e-01 
##     Pardlugu     Pardmont     Pardnigr     Pardpull     Trocterr     Zoraspin 
## 6.477976e-01 1.022018e+00 3.971634e-01 4.274454e-01 6.798089e-02 2.758446e-01
# Coefficients for covariates are named as `Xcoef`
# Confidence intervals for these coefficients:
confint(fitx1, parm = "Xcoef")
##               cilow       ciup
## Xcoef1  -0.89413837  0.2059263
## Xcoef2   1.60653994  3.6156809
## Xcoef3  -2.83503803 -0.8988983
## Xcoef4   5.72879548  6.9144033
## Xcoef5  -2.87611514 -0.6373125
## Xcoef6   2.77826475  5.5845296
## Xcoef7  -1.62666107  0.5360173
## Xcoef8   0.82543215  2.7594753
## Xcoef9   3.71814685  6.0902191
## Xcoef10  4.08453542  6.6147511
## Xcoef11  1.89268036  2.7788647
## Xcoef12  2.47215622  4.6387621
## Xcoef13  0.99262088  2.1960315
## Xcoef14  0.22972302  1.0195833
## Xcoef15 -0.23417207  1.7277008
## Xcoef16 -0.03218841  1.6733709
## Xcoef17  1.63801838  4.1401341
## Xcoef18  0.04128991  1.3250026
## Xcoef19 -1.72657436 -0.7944556
## Xcoef20  0.93054958  2.0077199
## Xcoef21  0.24237359  1.4779180
## Xcoef22  0.64776105  1.9168063
## Xcoef23 -0.00557523  0.4524716
## Xcoef24 -0.32437013  0.5639846
# The first 12 intervals are for soil.dry and next 12 for reflection

Problems? See hints:

I have problems in model fitting. My model converges to infinity or local maxima: GLLVMs are complex models where starting values have a big role. Choosing a different starting value method (see argument starting.val) or use multiple runs and pick up the one giving highest log-likelihood value using argument n.init. More variation to the starting points can be added with jitter.var.

My results does not look the same as in answers: The results may not be exactly the same as in the answers, as the initial values for each model fit are slightly different, so the results may also differ slightly.

Studying species correlations

Species correlations

Latent variables induce correlation across response variables, and so provide means of estimating correlation patterns across species, and the extent to which they can be explained by environmental variables.
Information on correlation is stored in the LV loadings \(\boldsymbol\theta_j\), so the residual covariance matrix, storing information on species co-occurrence that is not explained by environmental variables, can be calculated as \(\boldsymbol\Sigma=\boldsymbol\Gamma \boldsymbol\Gamma^\top\), where \(\boldsymbol\Gamma = [\boldsymbol\theta_1\dots\boldsymbol\theta_m]'\).
getResidualCor function can be used to estimate the correlation matrix of the linear predictor across species.
Let’s consider first the correlation matrix based on a model without predictors: \(g(E(y_{ij})) = \beta_{0j} + \boldsymbol{u}_i'\boldsymbol{\theta}_j\)

fitnb <- gllvm(spider$abund, family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 2)

The correlation matrix based on such model does not take into account the environmental conditions driving species abundances at sites, and reflects only what has been observed.

Visualizing species correlations

The residual correlations can be visualized either using biplot, which shows the species ordination, or visualizing the actual correlation matrix using, eg., a corrplot package.
The biplot can be produced using a function ordiplot() with an argument biplot = TRUE:

fitnb <- gllvm(spider$abund, family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 2)
ordiplot(fitnb, biplot = TRUE)
abline(h = 0, v = 0, lty=2)

Correlations can be visualized more precisely using corrplot() function:

fitnb <- gllvm(spider$abund, family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 2)
cr <- getResidualCor(fitnb)
library(corrplot);
corrplot(cr, diag = FALSE, type = "lower", method = "square", tl.srt = 25)

The same correlations can also be visualized with species ordination in biplot:

ordiplot(fitnb, biplot = TRUE)
abline(h = 0, v = 0, lty=2)

Studying effects of covariates

Studying effects of environmental variables

The effects of environmental variables on species can be studied by including environmental variables \(\boldsymbol{x}_i\) to GLLVM: \(g(E(y_{ij})) = \beta_{0j} + \boldsymbol{x}_i'\boldsymbol{\beta}_{j} + \boldsymbol{u}_i'\boldsymbol{\theta}_j\).
\(\boldsymbol{\beta}_{j}\) is a vector of species specific coefficients for environmental variables.
Next consider for example two environmental variables, soil.dry (soil dry mass) and reflection (reflection of the soil surface with a cloudless sky), which shows different environmental gradients in ordination:

rbPal <- c("#00FA9A", "#00EC9F", "#00DFA4", "#00D2A9", "#00C5AF", "#00B8B4", "#00ABB9", "#009DBF", "#0090C4", "#0083C9", "#0076CF", "#0069D4", "#005CD9", "#004EDF", "#0041E4", "#0034E9", "#0027EF", "#001AF4", "#000DF9", "#0000FF")
X <- spider$x[,c(1,6)]
par(mfrow = c(1,2), mar=c(4,4,2,2))
for(i in 1:ncol(X)){
Col <- rbPal[as.numeric(cut(X[,i], breaks = 20))]
ordiplot(fitnb, symbols = T, s.colors = Col, main = colnames(X)[i], biplot = TRUE)
abline(h=0,v=0, lty=2)

}

Coefficient plot

coefplot() plots point estimates of the species specific environmental coefficients \(\boldsymbol{\beta}_{j}\) with confidence intervals.
As biplots with environmental gradients indicated that, for example, species named Arctperi prefers sites with low amount of dry soil mass and high amount of reflection with sky, the similar effects can be seen in the coefficients plotted with their confidence intervals.

fitx1 <- gllvm(spider$abund, X, family = "negative.binomial", num.lv = 1)
coefplot(fitx1, mfrow = c(1,2), cex.ylab = 0.8)

Correlation matrix

Correlation matrix for model with predictors shows correlation patterns between species when the effect of the predictors are taken into account.
When the effects of covariates dry.soil and reflection were accounted, negative correlation between species do not seem to exist anymore, indicating that negative correlations were explained by different environmental conditions at sites and how species respond to them, rather than direct species interactions.

crx <- getResidualCor(fitx1)
corrplot(crx, diag = FALSE, type = "lower", method = "square", tl.srt = 25)

Fourth corner models

If species trait variables \(\boldsymbol{t}_j\), measuring eg. species behaviour or physical appearance, would be available, fourth corner models should be considered: \(g(E(y_{ij})) = \beta_{0j} + \boldsymbol{x}_i'\boldsymbol{\beta}_{j} + \boldsymbol{x}_i'\boldsymbol{B}_{I}\boldsymbol{t}_j + \boldsymbol{u}_i'\boldsymbol{\theta}_j\)
Such models can also be fitted with gllvm() function by including a matrix of traits with argument TR.
Examples can be found in the gllvm package’s vignettes.

Niku, J., F.K.C. Hui, S. Taskinen, and D.I. Warton. 2019. Gllvm - Fast Analysis of Multivariate Abundance Data with Generalized Linear Latent Variable Models in R. 10. Methods in Ecology and Evolution: 2173–82↩︎
Kasper Kristensen, Anders Nielsen, Casper W. Berg, Hans Skaug, Bradley M. Bell (2016). TMB: Automatic Differentiation and Laplace Approximation. Journal of Statistical Software, 70(5), 1-21↩︎
Hui, F. K. C., Warton, D., Ormerod, J., Haapaniemi, V., and Taskinen, S. (2017). Variational approximations for generalized linear latent variable models. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 26:35-43↩︎
Korhonen, P., Hui, F. K. C., Niku, J., and Taskinen, S. (2021). Fast, universal estimation of latent variable models using extended variational approximations, arXiv:2107.02627 .↩︎
Niku, J., Warton, D. I., Hui, F. K. C., and Taskinen, S. (2017). Generalized linear latent variable models for multivariate count and biomass data in ecology. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 22:498-522.↩︎

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.