The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
gtheoryr is a small R package for simple
generalizability theory workflows. It is intentionally modest in scope
so it is easy to understand, extend, and prepare for a first CRAN
submission.
Nine functions now connect the G-study to assessment planning:
| Function | Use |
|---|---|
check_gstudy_design() |
Diagnose missing scores, identifiers, cells and imbalance |
error_budget() |
Decompose relative and absolute D-study error |
sem_gtheory() |
Report measurement error on the mean-score scale |
score_interval() |
Construct approximate normal measurement intervals |
dstudy_grid() |
Compare a grid of candidate facet counts |
optimize_dstudy() |
Find the cheapest candidates meeting a G or Phi target |
dstudy_sensitivity() |
Compare gains from increasing each facet separately |
simulate_gstudy() |
Generate balanced continuous Gaussian crossed data |
bootstrap_gstudy() |
Estimate parametric bootstrap uncertainty for crossed designs |
Read the planning guide for the research sources, assumptions and worked calculations. A runnable example is in inst/examples/planning.R.
The new planning functions reject negative variance estimates unless
you explicitly request negative = "zero"; adjusted
components are reported. All facets are random. Designs must be
balanced, with one observation per cell. The bootstrap supports crossed
designs and assumes independent Gaussian effects. No additional package
dependencies are required.
The package currently includes:
gstudy_pxi() for a fully crossed persons-by-items
designgstudy_crossed() for generic balanced crossed designs
with one or more facetsgstudy_pxif() for a fully crossed
persons-by-items-by-facet designgstudy_pxir() and gstudy_pxio() as
convenience wrappers for raters and occasionsgstudy_pxiro() as a convenience wrapper for
persons-by-items-by-raters-by-occasions designsgstudy_nested_ip() for a simple balanced nested
items-within-person designdstudy_pxi() for relative and absolute decision
summariesdstudy_crossed() for generic crossed-design
D-studiesdstudy_pxif() for current-design or proposed-design
summaries with a third facetdstudy_pxir() and dstudy_pxio() as
convenience wrappers for raters and occasionsdstudy_pxiro() for current-design or proposed-design
summaries with raters and occasions togetherdstudy_nested_ip() for a simple nested-design
D-studyanova_table(), mean_squares_table(), and
variance_components_table() for pulling tidy output tables
from a G-study objectvariance_proportions_table() for showing how much each
variance component contributesinstall.packages("path/to/gtheoryr_0.2.0.tar.gz", repos = NULL, type = "source")library(gtheoryr)
scores <- data.frame(
person = rep(c("P1", "P2", "P3"), each = 3),
item = rep(c("I1", "I2", "I3"), times = 3),
score = c(8, 7, 9, 5, 4, 6, 7, 6, 8)
)
gs <- gstudy_pxi(scores, person = "person", item = "item", score = "score")
gs
dstudy_pxi(gs, n_items = 6)library(gtheoryr)
scores <- expand.grid(
person = c("P1", "P2", "P3"),
item = c("I1", "I2"),
rater = c("R1", "R2"),
stringsAsFactors = FALSE
)
scores$score <- c(8, 7, 7, 6, 5, 4, 6, 5, 7, 6, 8, 7)
gs3 <- gstudy_pxif(
scores,
person = "person",
item = "item",
facet = "rater",
score = "score",
facet_name = "rater"
)
gs3
variance_components_table(gs3)
dstudy_pxif(gs3)library(gtheoryr)
scores4 <- read.csv(
system.file("extdata", "crossed_scores_rater_occasion.csv", package = "gtheoryr"),
stringsAsFactors = FALSE
)
gs4 <- gstudy_pxiro(
scores4,
person = "person",
item = "item",
rater = "rater",
occasion = "occasion",
score = "score"
)
gs4
variance_components_table(gs4)
variance_proportions_table(gs4)
dstudy_pxiro(gs4)Before submitting to CRAN, you should:
DESCRIPTION are
correct.R CMD check --as-cran gtheoryr.cran-comments.md file summarizing check
results.These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.