The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
Hacksig is a collection of cancer transcriptomics gene signatures as well as a simple and tidy interface to compute single sample enrichment scores.
This document will show you how to getting started with hacksig, but first, we must load the following packages:
library(hacksig)
# to plot and transform data
library(dplyr)
library(ggplot2)
library(purrr)
library(tibble)
library(tidyr)
# to get the MSigDB gene signatures
library(msigdbr)
# to parallelize computations
library(future)
theme_set(theme_bw())
In order to get a complete list of the implemented signatures, you can use get_sig_info()
. It returns a tibble with very useful information:
signature_id
;|
symbol);publication_doi
linking to the original publication;description
.get_sig_info()
#> # A tibble: 23 × 4
#> signature_id signature_keywords publication_doi description
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 ayers2017_immexp ayers2017_immexp|immune expand… 10.1172/JCI911… Immune exp…
#> 2 bai2019_immune bai2019_immune|head and neck|h… 10.1155/2019/3… Immune/inf…
#> 3 cinsarc cinsarc|metastasis|sarcoma|sts 10.1038/nm.2174 Biomarker …
#> 4 dececco2014_int172 dececco2014_int172|head and ne… 10.1093/annonc… Signature …
#> 5 eschrich2009_rsi eschrich2009_rsi|radioresistan… 10.1016/j.ijro… Genes aime…
#> # … with 18 more rows
To get a full view of the tibble, use:
get_sig_info() %>% print(n = Inf)
# or
View(get_sig_info())
If you want to get the list of gene symbols for one or more of the implemented signatures, then use get_sig_genes()
with valid keywords:
get_sig_genes("ifng")
#> $muro2016_ifng
#> [1] "CXCL10" "CXCL9" "HLA-DRA" "IDO1" "IFNG" "STAT1"
The first thing you should do before computing scores for a signature is to check how many of its genes are present in your data. To accomplish this, we can use check_sig()
on a normalized gene expression matrix (either microarray or RNA-seq normalized data), which must be formatted as an object of class matrix
or data.frame
with gene symbols as row names and sample IDs as column names.
For this tutorial, we will use test_expr
(an R object included in hacksig) as an example gene expression matrix with 20 simulated samples.
By default, check_sig()
will compute statistics for every signature implemented in hacksig
.
check_sig(test_expr)
#> # A tibble: 23 × 5
#> signature_id n_genes n_present frac_present missing_genes
#> <chr> <int> <int> <dbl> <named list>
#> 1 muro2016_ifng 6 4 0.667 <chr [2]>
#> 2 wu2020_metabolic 30 20 0.667 <chr [10]>
#> 3 liu2020_immune 6 4 0.667 <chr [2]>
#> 4 liu2021_mgs 6 4 0.667 <chr [2]>
#> 5 estimate_stromal 141 91 0.645 <chr [50]>
#> # … with 18 more rows
You can filter for specific signatures by entering keywords in the signatures
argument (partial match and regular expressions will work):
check_sig(test_expr, signatures = c("metab", "cinsarc"))
#> # A tibble: 2 × 5
#> signature_id n_genes n_present frac_present missing_genes
#> <chr> <int> <int> <dbl> <named list>
#> 1 wu2020_metabolic 30 20 0.667 <chr [10]>
#> 2 cinsarc 67 40 0.597 <chr [27]>
We can also check for signatures not implemented in hacksig, that is custom signatures. For example, we can use the msigdbr
package to download the Hallmark gene set collection as a tibble and transform it into a list:
<- msigdbr(species = "Homo sapiens", category = "H") %>%
hallmark_list distinct(gs_name, gene_symbol) %>%
nest(genes = c(gene_symbol)) %>%
mutate(genes = map(genes, compose(as_vector, unname))) %>%
deframe()
check_sig(test_expr, hallmark_list)
#> # A tibble: 50 × 5
#> signature_id n_genes n_present frac_present missing_genes
#> <chr> <int> <int> <dbl> <named list>
#> 1 HALLMARK_WNT_BETA_CATENIN_SIGNAL… 42 27 0.643 <chr [15]>
#> 2 HALLMARK_APICAL_SURFACE 44 28 0.636 <chr [16]>
#> 3 HALLMARK_BILE_ACID_METABOLISM 112 70 0.625 <chr [42]>
#> 4 HALLMARK_NOTCH_SIGNALING 32 20 0.625 <chr [12]>
#> 5 HALLMARK_PI3K_AKT_MTOR_SIGNALING 105 65 0.619 <chr [40]>
#> # … with 45 more rows
Missing genes for the HALLMARK_NOTCH_SIGNALING
gene set are:
check_sig(test_expr, hallmark_list) %>%
filter(signature_id == "HALLMARK_NOTCH_SIGNALING") %>%
pull(missing_genes)
#> $HALLMARK_NOTCH_SIGNALING
#> [1] "FZD5" "HEYL" "KAT2A" "MAML2" "NOTCH1" "NOTCH3" "PPARD"
#> [8] "PRKCA" "PSEN2" "SAP30" "ST3GAL6" "TCF7L2"
The main function of the package, hack_sig()
, permits to obtain single sample scores from gene signatures. By default, it will compute scores for all the signatures implemented in the package with the original publication method.
hack_sig(test_expr)
#> Warning: ℹ No genes are present in 'expr_data' for the following signatures:
#> x rooney2015_cyt
#> ℹ To obtain CINSARC, ESTIMATE and Immunophenoscore with the original procedures, see:
#> ?hack_cinsarc
#> ?hack_estimate
#> ?hack_immunophenoscore
#> # A tibble: 20 × 16
#> sample_id ayers2017_immexp bai2019_immune dececco2014_int172 eschrich2009_rsi
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 sample1 5.71 -22.3 2.62 0.0289
#> 2 sample2 5.88 -29.9 2.17 0.565
#> 3 sample3 8.12 -27.5 2.25 0.456
#> 4 sample4 7.82 -41.0 2.00 0.479
#> 5 sample5 7.88 -29.9 2.51 0.355
#> # … with 15 more rows, and 11 more variables: eustace2013_hypoxia <dbl>,
#> # fang2021_irgs <dbl>, hu2021_derbp <dbl>, li2021_irgs <dbl>,
#> # liu2020_immune <dbl>, liu2021_mgs <dbl>, lohavanichbutr2013_hpvneg <dbl>,
#> # muro2016_ifng <dbl>, qiang2021_irgs <dbl>, she2020_irgs <dbl>,
#> # wu2020_metabolic <dbl>
You can also filter for specific signatures (e.g. the immune and stromal ESTIMATE signatures) and choose a particular single sample method:
hack_sig(test_expr, signatures = "estimate", method = "zscore")
#> # A tibble: 20 × 3
#> sample_id estimate_immune estimate_stromal
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 sample1 -2.65 -0.262
#> 2 sample2 1.19 -0.717
#> 3 sample3 -0.455 0.254
#> 4 sample4 -0.722 2.19
#> 5 sample5 -1.07 0.112
#> # … with 15 more rows
Valid choices for single sample method
s are:
"zscore"
, for the combined z-score;"ssgsea"
, for the single sample GSEA;"singscore"
, for the singscore method.Run ?hack_sig
to see additional parameter specifications for these methods.
As in check_sig()
, the argument signatures
can also be a list of gene signatures. For example, we can compute normalized single sample GSEA scores for the Hallmark gene sets:
hack_sig(test_expr, hallmark_list,
method = "ssgsea", sample_norm = "separate", alpha = 0.5)
#> # A tibble: 20 × 51
#> sample_id HALLMARK_ADIPOGE… HALLMARK_ALLOGR… HALLMARK_ANDROG… HALLMARK_ANGIOG…
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 sample1 0.683 0.419 0.943 0.447
#> 2 sample2 0.501 0.554 0.643 0.612
#> 3 sample3 0.387 0.368 0.695 0.409
#> 4 sample4 0.710 0.524 0.793 0.502
#> 5 sample5 0.339 0.422 0.917 0.0500
#> # … with 15 more rows, and 46 more variables: HALLMARK_APICAL_JUNCTION <dbl>,
#> # HALLMARK_APICAL_SURFACE <dbl>, HALLMARK_APOPTOSIS <dbl>,
#> # HALLMARK_BILE_ACID_METABOLISM <dbl>,
#> # HALLMARK_CHOLESTEROL_HOMEOSTASIS <dbl>, HALLMARK_COAGULATION <dbl>,
#> # HALLMARK_COMPLEMENT <dbl>, HALLMARK_DNA_REPAIR <dbl>,
#> # HALLMARK_E2F_TARGETS <dbl>,
#> # HALLMARK_EPITHELIAL_MESENCHYMAL_TRANSITION <dbl>, …
There are three methods for which hack_sig()
cannot be used to compute gene signature scores with the original method. These are: CINSARC, ESTIMATE and the Immunophenoscore.
For the CINSARC classification, you must provide a vector with distant metastasis status:
set.seed(123)
<- sample(c(0, 1), size = ncol(test_expr), replace = TRUE)
rand_dm hack_cinsarc(test_expr, rand_dm)
#> # A tibble: 20 × 2
#> sample_id cinsarc_class
#> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 sample1 C2
#> 2 sample2 C1
#> 3 sample3 C2
#> 4 sample4 C1
#> 5 sample5 C2
#> # … with 15 more rows
Immune, stromal, ESTIMATE and tumor purity scores from the ESTIMATE method can be obtained with:
hack_estimate(test_expr)
#> # A tibble: 20 × 5
#> sample_id immune_score stroma_score estimate_score purity_score
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 sample1 -636. 778. 142. 0.811
#> 2 sample2 2118. 703. 2821. 0.524
#> 3 sample3 725. 805. 1530. 0.675
#> 4 sample4 737. 2031. 2768. 0.531
#> 5 sample5 181. 1129. 1310. 0.699
#> # … with 15 more rows
Finally, the raw immunophenoscore and its discrete (0-10 normalized) counterpart can be obtained with:
hack_immunophenoscore(test_expr)
#> # A tibble: 20 × 3
#> sample_id raw_score ips_score
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 sample1 0.942 3
#> 2 sample2 -0.348 0
#> 3 sample3 0.0939 0
#> 4 sample4 -0.335 0
#> 5 sample5 1.64 5
#> # … with 15 more rows
You can also obtain all biomarker scores with:
hack_immunophenoscore(test_expr, extract = "all")
#> # A tibble: 20 × 19
#> sample_id raw_score ips_score ec_score mhc_score sc_score cp_score
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 sample1 0.942 3 -0.148 0.312 0.652 0.126
#> 2 sample2 -0.348 0 0.0679 -0.796 -0.0268 0.407
#> 3 sample3 0.0939 0 0.0347 -0.483 -0.0843 0.627
#> 4 sample4 -0.335 0 0.292 -0.777 0.166 -0.0161
#> 5 sample5 1.64 5 0.0607 0.876 -0.0742 0.778
#> # … with 15 more rows, and 12 more variables: act_cd8_score <dbl>,
#> # tem_cd8_score <dbl>, tem_cd4_score <dbl>, b2m_score <dbl>,
#> # act_cd4_score <dbl>, treg_score <dbl>, mdsc_score <dbl>, cd27_score <dbl>,
#> # icos_score <dbl>, pd1_score <dbl>, pdl2_score <dbl>, tigit_score <dbl>
If you want to categorize your samples into two or more signature classes based on a score cutoff, you can use hack_class()
after hack_sig()
:
%>%
test_expr hack_sig("estimate", method = "singscore", direction = "up") %>%
hack_class()
#> # A tibble: 20 × 3
#> sample_id estimate_immune estimate_stromal
#> <chr> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 sample1 low low
#> 2 sample2 high low
#> 3 sample3 low low
#> 4 sample4 low high
#> 5 sample5 low high
#> # … with 15 more rows
By default, hack_class()
will stratify samples either with the original publication method (if any) or by the median score (otherwise). hack_class()
will work only with signatures implemented in hacksig
.
Our rank-based single sample method implementations (i.e. single sample GSEA and singscore) are slower than their counterparts implemented in GSVA
and singscore
. Hence, to speed-up computation time you can use the future
package:
plan(multisession)
hack_sig(test_expr, hallmark_list, method = "ssgsea")
#> # A tibble: 20 × 51
#> sample_id HALLMARK_ADIPOGE… HALLMARK_ALLOGR… HALLMARK_ANDROG… HALLMARK_ANGIOG…
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 sample1 1593. 709. 2013. 1396.
#> 2 sample2 1279. 1052. 1067. 1672.
#> 3 sample3 1061. 661. 1151. 1145.
#> 4 sample4 1613. 954. 1677. 1586.
#> 5 sample5 818. 804. 1866. 622.
#> # … with 15 more rows, and 46 more variables: HALLMARK_APICAL_JUNCTION <dbl>,
#> # HALLMARK_APICAL_SURFACE <dbl>, HALLMARK_APOPTOSIS <dbl>,
#> # HALLMARK_BILE_ACID_METABOLISM <dbl>,
#> # HALLMARK_CHOLESTEROL_HOMEOSTASIS <dbl>, HALLMARK_COAGULATION <dbl>,
#> # HALLMARK_COMPLEMENT <dbl>, HALLMARK_DNA_REPAIR <dbl>,
#> # HALLMARK_E2F_TARGETS <dbl>,
#> # HALLMARK_EPITHELIAL_MESENCHYMAL_TRANSITION <dbl>, …
Let’s say we want to compute single sample scores for the KEGG gene set collection and then correlate these scores with the tumor purity given by the ESTIMATE method.
First, we get the KEGG list and use check_sig()
to keep only those gene sets whose genes are more than 2/3 present in our gene expression matrix.
<- msigdbr(species = "Homo sapiens", subcategory = "KEGG") %>%
kegg_list distinct(gs_name, gene_symbol) %>%
nest(genes = c(gene_symbol)) %>%
mutate(genes = map(genes, compose(as_vector, unname))) %>%
deframe()
<- check_sig(test_expr, kegg_list) %>%
kegg_ok filter(frac_present > 0.66) %>%
pull(signature_id)
Then, we apply both the combined z-score and the ssGSEA method for the resulting list of 10 KEGG gene sets using purrr::map_dfr()
:
<- map_dfr(list(zscore = "zscore", ssgsea = "ssgsea"),
kegg_scores ~ hack_sig(test_expr,
kegg_list[kegg_ok],method = .x,
sample_norm = "separate"),
.id = "method")
We can transform the kegg_scores
tibble in long format using tidyr::pivot_longer()
:
<- kegg_scores %>%
kegg_scores pivot_longer(starts_with("KEGG"),
names_to = "kegg_id", values_to = "kegg_score")
Finally, after computing the tumor purity scores, we can merge the two data sets and plot the results:
<- hack_estimate(test_expr) %>% select(sample_id, purity_score)
purity_scores
%>%
kegg_scores left_join(purity_scores, by = "sample_id") %>%
ggplot(aes(x = kegg_id, y = kegg_score)) +
geom_boxplot(outlier.alpha = 0) +
geom_jitter(aes(color = purity_score), alpha = 0.8, width = 0.1) +
facet_wrap(facets = vars(method), scales = "free_x") +
coord_flip() +
scale_color_viridis_c() +
labs(x = NULL, y = "enrichment score", color = "Tumor purity") +
theme(legend.position = "top")
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.