The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
Maintainer: Luca Sartore
This research was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agriculture Statistics Service. The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA, or US Government determination or policy.
Calibration forces the weighted estimates of calibration variables to match known totals. This improves the quality of the design-weighted estimates. It is used to adjust for non-response and/or under-coverage. The commonly used methods of calibration produce non-integer weights. In cases where weighted estimates must be integers, one must “integerize” the calibrated weights. However, this procedure often produces final weights that are very different for the “sample” weights. To counter this problem, the inca package provides specific functions for rounding real weights to integers, and performing an integer programming algorithm for calibration problems with integer weights.
For a complete list of exported functions, use
library(help = "inca") once the inca
package is installed (see the inst/INSTALL.md file for a
detailed description of the setup process).
library(inca)
set.seed(0)
w <- rpois(150, 4)
data <- matrix(rbinom(150000, 1, .3) * rpois(150000, 4), 1000, 150)
y <- data %*% w
w <- runif(150, 0, 7.5)
print(sum(abs(y - data %*% w)))
cw <- intcalibrate(w, ~. + 0, y, lower = 1, upper = 7, sparse = TRUE, data = data)
print(sum(abs(y - data %*% cw)))
barplot(table(cw), main = "Calibrated integer weights")Theberge, A. (1999). Extensions of calibration estimators in survey sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 635-644.
Little, R. J., & Vartivarian, S. (2003). On weighting the rates in non-response weights.
Kish, L. (1992). Weighting for unequal Pi. Journal of Official Statistics, 8(2), 183.
Rao, J. N. K., & Singh, A. C. (1997). A ridge-shrinkage method for range-restricted weight calibration in survey sampling. In Proceedings of the section on survey research methods (pp. 57-65). American Statistical Association, Washington, DC.
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 663-685.
Kalton, G., & Flores-Cervantes, I. (2003). Weighting methods. Journal of Official Statistics, 19(2), 81-98.
Sartore, L., Toppin, K., Young, L., Spiegelman, C. 2019. Developing integer calibration weights for the Census of Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 24(1), 26-48.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.