The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.

Estimate Measures of Injury Epidemiology

2023-11-14

Whenever one collects and prepares the data, the next natural step is to summarize and explore these data. In this case, from a sports-applied point of view, one wants to know e.g.: how many and what type of injuries have occurred, how often they have occurred or what the load has been.

This document shows convenient functions from injurytools to describe sports injury data, in terms of measures used in sports injury epidemiology (see Bahr and Holme (2003) and Waldén et al. (2023)). Below, these measures are explained and then, injsummary() and injprev() functions are illustrated.

Measures of occurrence

Rates

As Hodgson Phillips (2000) state,

“Sports injuries occur when athletes are exposed to their given sport and they occur under specific conditions, at a known time and place.”

Thus, when attempting to describe the distribution of injuries it is necessary to relate this to the population at risk over a specified time period. This is why the fundamental unit of measurement is rate.

A rate is a measure that consists of a denominator and a numerator over a period of time. Denominator data can be a number of different things (e.g. number of minutes trained/played, number of matches played). As such, it reflects the speed at which new “injury-related” events occur.

Injury incidence rate

Injury incidence rate is the number of new injury cases (\(I\)) per unit of player-exposure time, i.e.

\[ I_{r} = \frac{I}{\Delta T}\] where \(\Delta T\) is the total time under risk of the study population.

Injury burden rate

Injury burden rate is the number of days lost (\(n_d\)) per unit of player-exposure time, i.e.

\[I_{br} = \frac{n_d}{\Delta T}\] where \(\Delta T\) is the total time under risk of the study population.

Prevalence

Prevalence, period prevalence, is a proportion that refers to the number of players that have reported the injury of interest (\(X\)) divided by the total player-population at risk at any time during the specified period of time (\(\Delta T\) time window). This includes players who already had the injury at the start of the time period as well as those who suffer it during that period.

\[P = \frac{X}{N}\] where \(X\) is the number of injury cases and \(N\) is the total number of players in the study at any point in the time window \(\Delta T\).

Please, see also the Notes section below.

In practice

Again, as in the prepare-data vignette, we use the data sets available from the injurytools package: data from Liverpool Football Club male’s first team players over two consecutive seasons, 2017-2018 and 2018-2019, scrapped from https://www.transfermarkt.com/ website¹.

- `injsummary()`

Prepare data

df_exposures <- prepare_exp(raw_df_exposures, player = "player_name",
                            date = "year", time_expo = "minutes_played")
df_injuries  <- prepare_inj(raw_df_injuries, player = "player_name",
                            date_injured = "from", date_recovered = "until")
injd         <- prepare_all(data_exposures = df_exposures,
                            data_injuries  = df_injuries,
                            exp_unit = "matches_minutes")

Now, the preprocessed data are passed to injsummary() to calculate injury summary statistics:

injds <- injsummary(injd)
#> Warning in injsummary_unit(unit, injds, quiet): 
#>   Exposure time unit is matches_minutes
#>   So... Injury incidence and injury burden are calculated per 100 player-matches of exposure (90 minutes times 100)
#> Warning in injsummary_unit(unit, injds_overall, quiet): 
#>   Exposure time unit is matches_minutes
#>   So... Injury incidence and injury burden are calculated per 100 player-matches of exposure (90 minutes times 100)

We notice that some warning messages pop up (unless quiet = TRUE). They are displayed to make it clear what the exposure time unit is².

What injsummary() returns as its output is a list of two elements:

str(injds, 1)
#> List of 2
#>  $ playerwise: tibble [28 × 9] (S3: tbl_df/tbl/data.frame)
#>  $ overall   : tibble [1 × 14] (S3: tbl_df/tbl/data.frame)
#>  - attr(*, "class")= chr [1:2] "injds" "list"
#>  - attr(*, "unit_exposure")= chr "matches_minutes"
#>  - attr(*, "unit_timerisk")= chr "100 player-match"
#>  - attr(*, "conf_level")= num 0.95

i.e. the output stored in this injds object consists of,two data frames (two tables), which can be accessed by typing injds[[1]] (or injds[["playerwise"]]) and injds[[2]] (injds[["overal"]]).

To present the results in a more tidier and comprehensible way (instead of R code styled output) the following can be done:

# the 'playerwise' data frame
injds[[1]]

Code to format the table

# format the 'playerwise' data frame for output as a table
injds[[1]] |> 
  arrange(desc(injincidence)) |> # sort by decreasing order of injincidence
  head(10) |>
  kable(digits = 2, col.names = c("Player", "N injuries", "N days lost", 
                                  "Mean days lost", "Median days lost", "IQR days lost",
                                  "Total exposure", "Incidence", "Burden"))

Player	N injuries	N days lost	Mean days lost	Median days lost	IQR days lost	Total exposure	Incidence	Burden
adam-lallana	6	302	43.14	43.0	18.5-52.5	700	77.14	3882.86
daniel-sturridge	3	122	30.50	33.5	12-52	927	29.13	1184.47
divock-origi	1	5	2.50	2.5	1.25-3.75	366	24.59	122.95
philippe-coutinho	3	62	15.50	18.5	9-25	1117	24.17	499.55
naby-keita	3	89	22.25	19.0	13.5-27.75	1393	19.38	575.02
dejan-lovren	6	160	22.86	13.0	9-28.5	3109	17.37	463.17
jordan-henderson	8	91	10.11	7.0	4-11	4154	17.33	197.16
xherdan-shaqiri	2	67	33.50	33.5	23.25-43.75	1057	17.03	570.48
fabinho	3	22	5.50	5.5	1.5-9.5	2013	13.41	98.36
james-milner	5	48	8.00	9.0	6.25-11.75	3548	12.68	121.76

We used RMarkdown, in particular knitr::kable() function, to report these tables in this way.

# the 'overall' data frame
injds[[2]]

Code to format the table

# format the table of total incidence and burden (main columns)
injds[[2]] |> 
  select(1:8) |> 
  data.frame(row.names = "TOTAL") |> 
  kable(digits = 2,
        col.names = c("N injuries", "N days lost", "Mean days lost",
                      "Median days lost", "IQR days lost",
                      "Total exposure", "Incidence", "Burden"),
        row.names = TRUE) |> 
  kable_styling(full_width = FALSE)

	N injuries	N days lost	Mean days lost	Median days lost	IQR days lost	Total exposure	Incidence	Burden
TOTAL	82	2049	18.97	7.5	1-20.25	74690	9.88	246.9

Note that to provide numbers that are easy to interpret and to avoid small decimals, injury incidence and injury burden are reported ‘per 100 player-match exposure’. As in this example exposure time is minutes played in matches, we multiply the rates by 90*100 (i.e. 90 minutes lasts a football match). The reported incidence rate is estimated by \(\hat{I}_r = \frac{82}{74690}\times90\times100\).

Code to format the table

# format the table of total incidence and burden (point + ci estimates)
injds_tot_cis <- injds[[2]] |> 
  select(7:last_col()) |> 
  data.frame(row.names = "TOTAL")
injds_tot_cis$ci_injincidence <- paste0("[",  round(injds_tot_cis$injincidence_lower, 1),
                                        ", ", round(injds_tot_cis$injincidence_upper, 1), "]")
injds_tot_cis$ci_injburden    <- paste0("[",  round(injds_tot_cis$injburden_lower, 1),
                                        ", ", round(injds_tot_cis$injburden_upper, 1), "]")

conf_level <- attr(injds, "conf_level") * 100

injds_tot_cis |> 
  select(1, 9, 2, 10) |> 
  kable(digits = 2,
        col.names = c("Incidence",  paste0(conf_level, "% CI for \\(I_r\\)"), 
                      "Burden",     paste0(conf_level, "% CI for \\(I_{br}\\)")))

	Incidence	95% CI for \(I_r\)	Burden	95% CI for \(I_{br}\)
TOTAL	9.88	[7.7, 12]	246.9	[236.2, 257.6]

Players with the highest injury incidence rate (all type of injuries) were Adam Lallana and Daniel Sturridge with 77.1 and 29.1 injuries per 100 player-matches respectively. The teams overall injury incidence was of 9.9 injuries per 100 player-matches and the injury burden of 246.9 days lost per 100 player-matches.

These summaries can be done by type of injury:

injstats_pertype <- injsummary(injd, var_type_injury = "injury_type", quiet = T)

These are the results of the team regarding injury incidence and injury burden by type of injury:

injstats_pertype[["overall"]]

Code to format the table

injstats_pertype[["overall"]] |> 
  select(1:5, 7:11) |> 
  mutate(ninjuries2 = paste0(ninjuries, " (", percent_ninjuries, ")"),
         ndayslost2 = paste0(ndayslost, " (", percent_dayslost, ")"),
         median_dayslost2 = paste0(median_dayslost, " (", iqr_dayslost, ")")) |> 
  select(1, 11:13, 8:10) |> 
  arrange(desc(injburden)) |> 
  kable(digits = 2,
        col.names = c("Type of injury", "N injuries (%)", "N days lost (%)",
                      "Median days lost (IQR)",
                      "Total exposure", "Incidence", "Burden"),
        row.names = TRUE) |> 
  kable_styling(full_width = FALSE)

	Type of injury	N injuries (%)	N days lost (%)	Median days lost (IQR)	Total exposure	Incidence	Burden
1	Muscle	25 (30.49)	735 (35.87)	21 (12-36)	74690	3.01	88.57
2	Ligament	9 (10.98)	596 (29.09)	28 (7-54)	74690	1.08	71.82
3	Unknown	21 (25.61)	332 (16.2)	7 (4-18)	74690	2.53	40.01
4	Concussion	16 (19.51)	213 (10.4)	10.5 (5.75-14.5)	74690	1.93	25.67
5	Bone	11 (13.41)	173 (8.44)	9 (4.5-16.5)	74690	1.33	20.85

- `injprev()`

Prepare data

df_exposures <- prepare_exp(raw_df_exposures, player = "player_name",
                            date = "year", time_expo = "minutes_played")
df_injuries  <- prepare_inj(raw_df_injuries, player = "player_name",
                            date_injured = "from", date_recovered = "until")
injd         <- prepare_all(data_exposures = df_exposures,
                            data_injuries  = df_injuries,
                            exp_unit = "matches_minutes")

We calculate the injury prevalence and the proportions of injury-free players on a season basis:

prev_table1 <- injprev(injd, by = "season")
prev_table1
#> # A tibble: 4 × 5
#>   season           type_injury     n n_player  prop
#>   <fct>            <fct>       <int>    <int> <dbl>
#> 1 season 2017/2018 Available       7       23  30.4
#> 2 season 2017/2018 Injured        16       23  69.6
#> 3 season 2018/2019 Available       2       19  10.5
#> 4 season 2018/2019 Injured        17       19  89.5

Making use of knitr::kable():

kable(prev_table1,
      col.names = c("Season", "Status", "N", "Total", "%"))

Season	Status	N	Total	%
season 2017/2018	Available	7	23	30.4
season 2017/2018	Injured	16	23	69.6
season 2018/2019	Available	2	19	10.5
season 2018/2019	Injured	17	19	89.5

Overall, there were more injured players in the 18-19 season than in the previous season. Let’s calculate it monthly:

prev_table2 <- injprev(injd, by = "monthly")

## compare two seasons July and August
prev_table2 |>
  group_by(season) |> 
  slice(1:4)
#> # A tibble: 8 × 6
#> # Groups:   season [2]
#>   season           month type_injury     n n_player  prop
#>   <fct>            <fct> <fct>       <int>    <int> <dbl>
#> 1 season 2017/2018 Jul   Available      21       23  91.3
#> 2 season 2017/2018 Jul   Injured         2       23   8.7
#> 3 season 2017/2018 Aug   Available      18       23  78.3
#> 4 season 2017/2018 Aug   Injured         5       23  21.7
#> 5 season 2018/2019 Jul   Available      16       19  84.2
#> 6 season 2018/2019 Jul   Injured         3       19  15.8
#> 7 season 2018/2019 Aug   Available      15       19  78.9
#> 8 season 2018/2019 Aug   Injured         4       19  21.1


## compare two seasons January and February
prev_table2 |>
  group_by(season) |> 
  slice(13:16)
#> # A tibble: 8 × 6
#> # Groups:   season [2]
#>   season           month type_injury     n n_player  prop
#>   <fct>            <fct> <fct>       <int>    <int> <dbl>
#> 1 season 2017/2018 Jan   Available      18       23  78.3
#> 2 season 2017/2018 Jan   Injured         5       23  21.7
#> 3 season 2017/2018 Feb   Available      21       23  91.3
#> 4 season 2017/2018 Feb   Injured         2       23   8.7
#> 5 season 2018/2019 Jan   Available       9       19  47.4
#> 6 season 2018/2019 Jan   Injured        10       19  52.6
#> 7 season 2018/2019 Feb   Available      12       19  63.2
#> 8 season 2018/2019 Feb   Injured         7       19  36.8

Looking at monthly basis, there were more differences w.r.t. player availability in Liverpool FC 1st male team, during the winter January/February months. More injured players in the 18-19 season.

prev_table3 <- injprev(injd, by = "monthly", var_type_injury = "injury_type")

Tidy up

## season 1
prev_table3 |> 
  filter(season == "season 2017/2018", month == "Jan") |> 
  kable(col.names = c("Season", "Month", "Status", "N", "Total", "%"),
        caption = "Season 2017/2018") |> 
  kable_styling(full_width = FALSE, position = "float_left")
## season 2
prev_table3 |> 
  filter(season == "season 2018/2019", month == "Jan") |> 
  kable(col.names = c("Season", "Month", "Status", "N", "Total", "%"),
        caption = "Season 2018/2019") |> 
  kable_styling(full_width = FALSE, position = "left")

Season 2017/2018
Season	Month	Status	N	Total	%
season 2017/2018	Jan	Available	18	23	78.3
season 2017/2018	Jan	Ligament	1	23	4.3
season 2017/2018	Jan	Muscle	3	23	13.0
season 2017/2018	Jan	Unknown	1	23	4.3

Season 2018/2019
Season	Month	Status	N	Total	%
season 2018/2019	Jan	Available	9	19	47.4
season 2018/2019	Jan	Bone	1	19	5.3
season 2018/2019	Jan	Concussion	2	19	10.5
season 2018/2019	Jan	Ligament	1	19	5.3
season 2018/2019	Jan	Muscle	3	19	15.8
season 2018/2019	Jan	Unknown	4	19	21.1

Further implementation

In the near future there will be available the negative binomial (method = "negbin" argument), zero-inflated poisson (“zinfpois”) and zero-inflated negative binomial ("zinfnb") methods in injsummary() function.

Finally, this document shows how to perform descriptive analyses for injury epidemiology, but naturally, following these analyses further statistical inferences or multivariate regression analyses may be chosen to infer about the player’s/athletes population properties (e.g. to test whether there are differences between the injury incidence rates of two cohorts) or to evaluate the influence of independent factors (e.g. previous injuries, workload) on the injuries occurred.

Notes

NOTE 1: as Bahr, Clarsen, and Ekstrand (2018) state, injury incidence (likelihood) and injury burden (severity) should be reported and assessed in conjunction rather than in isolation. In this regard, see the risk matrix plot provided by gg_injriskmatrix() function.

NOTE 2: neither injury incidence (\(I_r\)) nor injury burden (\(I_{br}\)) are ratios, and they are not interpreted as a probability; they are rates and their unit (person-time)\(^{-1}\) (e.g. per 1000h of player-exposure, per player-season etc.).

NOTE 3: as Waldén et al. (2023) point out, incidence-based measures that provide a standardized time window for the population at risk (e.g., injuries per hour) are preferred over measures in which the time at risk varies among individuals (e.g., injuries per athletic exposure, injuries per number of matches). This preference for measures with standardized time scales aids in the comparison of statistics across different cohorts and sports.

References

Bahr, R, B Clarsen, and J Ekstrand. 2018. “Why We Should Focus on the Burden of Injuries and Illnesses, Not Just Their Incidence.” British Journal of Sports Medicine 52 (16): 1018–21. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098160.

Bahr, R, and I Holme. 2003. “Risk Factors for Sports Injuries—a Methodological Approach.” British Journal of Sports Medicine 37 (5): 384–92. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.5.384.

Hodgson Phillips, L. 2000. “Sports Injury Incidence.” British Journal of Sports Medicine 34 (2): 133–36. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.34.2.133.

Waldén, Markus, Margo Mountjoy, Alan McCall, Andreas Serner, Andrew Massey, Johannes L Tol, Roald Bahr, et al. 2023. “Football-Specific Extension of the IOC Consensus Statement: Methods for Recording and Reporting of Epidemiological Data on Injury and Illness in Sport 2020.” British Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-106405.

These data sets are provided for illustrative purposes. We warn that they might not be accurate and could potentially include discrepancies or incomplete information compared to what actually occurred.↩︎
Something that it is important to be aware of.↩︎

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.

Estimate Measures of Injury Epidemiology

2023-11-14

Measures of occurrence

Rates

Injury incidence rate

Injury burden rate

Prevalence

In practice

- injsummary()

- injprev()

Further implementation

Notes

References

- `injsummary()`

- `injprev()`