The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.

ivdoctr

Instrumental variables are a useful tool in causal inference. In order to be valid, researchers impose both formal beliefs (instrumental relevance and the exclusion restriction) and informal beliefs (e.g., correlation between endogenous treatment and the error term). The goal of ivdoctr is to formalize those beliefs and quantifies how sensitive a researcher’s instrumental variables are to measurement error and instrument endogeneity. Using data and researcher’s beliefs on measurement error and instrument endogeneity, this package generates the space of consistent beliefs across measurement error, instrument endogeneity, and instrumental relevance for IV regressions.

Installation

You can install the released version of ivdoctr from CRAN with:

install.packages("ivdoctr")

And the development version from GitHub with:

# install.packages("devtools")
devtools::install_github("fditraglia/ivdoctr")

Example

This section illustrates how to use the ivdoctr package in practice. This example comes from “The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation” by Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001). The authors study the effect of institutions on GDP per capita across 64 countries. Since institutional quality is endogenous, they use differences in mortality rates of early western settlers across colonies as an instrumental variable. The regression specification is as follows:

The authors state that there is likely a positive correlation between institutional quality and the error term, which could come from reverse causality (e.g., wealthier societies can afford better institutions) or omitted variables (e.g., rule of law or British culture are positively correlated with present-day institutional quality). This positive correlation is a researcher belief that can be input into ivdoctr using the r_TstarU_restriction argument that accepts a 2-column matrix of bounds. For the exercise, we use 0.9 as the conservative upper bound on the extent of the endogeneity.

The authors also state that up to 40% of the measure of “institutions” is noise. Measurement error is 1-, so [0.6, 1] is the translation of this belief. The code below implements these beliefs and runs the estimation and saves the TeX table to “colonial.tex”:

library(ivdoctr)
endog <- c(0, 0.9)
meas <- c(0.6, 1)

colonial_example1 <- ivdoctr(y_name = "logpgp95", T_name = "avexpr", 
                             z_name = "logem4", data = colonial,
                             controls = NULL, robust = FALSE,
                             r_TstarU_restriction = endog,
                             k_restriction = meas,
                             example_name = "Colonial Origins")
                             
endog <- c(0, 0.9)
meas <- c(0.001, 0.6)

colonial_example2 <- ivdoctr(y_name = "logpgp95", T_name = "avexpr", 
                             z_name = "logem4", data = colonial,
                             controls = NULL, robust = FALSE,
                             r_TstarU_restriction = endog,
                             k_restriction = meas,
                             example_name = "Colonial Origins")
                                
makeTable(colonial_example1, colonial_example2, output = "colonial.tex")

To explore the surface of estimates consistent with the researcher’s beliefs, ivdoctr also generates an interactive 3D plot of the surface:

library(ivdoctr)
endog <- c(0, 0.9)
meas <- c(0.6, 1)

plot_3d_beta(y_name = "logpgp95", T_name = "avexpr", z_name = "logem4",
             data = colonial, r_TstarU_restriction = endog, k_restriction = meas)

Usage

This package exports three main functions:

Both ivdoctr and plot_3d_beta use the same primary inputs. Users input the name of the dataset (data), the name of the dependent variable (y_name), the name of the treatment variable(s) (T_name), the name(s) of the instrument(s) (z_name), and the names of the control variables (controls). Without any additional arguments, the functions will output the identified set. If users have beliefs over measurement error and/or instrument endogeneity, they can specify those using k_restriction and r_TstarU_restriction, respectively.

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.