The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
{logitr} is faster than most other packages with similar functionality. To demonstrate this, a benchmark was conducted by estimating the same preference space mixed logit model using the following R packages:
The benchmark can be viewed at this Google Colab notebook:
https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1vYlBdJd4xCV43UwJ33XXpO3Ys8xWkuxx?usp=sharing
Benchmarks will always vary for every run of a benchmarking code, even when run on the same machine due to variations in background processes. Thus, if you run this code yourself on a different machine, your results may vary, though the overall order and trends in terms of each package’s relative speed should be similar to those from the Colab notebook.
The {logitr} package includes a runtimes
data frame that
is exported from the Google
Colab notebook used to conduct the benchmark. The tables below
summarize the run times for each package and how many times slower they
are relative to {logitr}.
library(logitr)
library(dplyr)
library(tidyr)
library(kableExtra) # For tables
numDraws <- unique(runtimes$numDraws)
logitr_time <- runtimes %>%
filter(package == "logitr") %>%
rename(time_logitr = time_sec)
time_compare <- runtimes %>%
left_join(select(logitr_time, -package), by = "numDraws") %>%
mutate(mult = round(time_sec/ time_logitr, 1)) %>%
select(-time_logitr)
# Compare raw times
time_compare %>%
select(-mult) %>%
pivot_wider(names_from = numDraws, values_from = time_sec) %>%
kbl()
package | 50 | 200 | 400 | 600 | 800 | 1000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
logitr | 2.752860 | 8.930408 | 13.72697 | 24.13735 | 33.47056 | 39.22012 |
mixl (1 core) | 10.640267 | 49.667703 | 80.22922 | 158.23673 | 229.17401 | 271.35824 |
mixl (2 cores) | 8.928487 | 41.577738 | 66.05436 | 129.84954 | 184.54557 | 230.91617 |
mlogit | 11.926502 | 19.901097 | 87.58429 | 60.38106 | 100.63138 | 98.41650 |
gmnl | 10.553787 | 31.379011 | 69.74575 | 121.93843 | 99.23701 | 141.36727 |
apollo (1 core) | 17.287605 | 44.118732 | 84.29395 | 129.33302 | 164.37400 | 198.21812 |
apollo (2 cores) | 21.911355 | 53.223971 | 82.69647 | 120.27101 | 163.80518 | 196.84896 |
# Compare how many times slower compared to logitr
time_compare %>%
select(-time_sec) %>%
pivot_wider(names_from = numDraws, values_from = mult) %>%
kbl()
package | 50 | 200 | 400 | 600 | 800 | 1000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
logitr | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
mixl (1 core) | 3.9 | 5.6 | 5.8 | 6.6 | 6.8 | 6.9 |
mixl (2 cores) | 3.2 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.9 |
mlogit | 4.3 | 2.2 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 |
gmnl | 3.8 | 3.5 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 3.0 | 3.6 |
apollo (1 core) | 6.3 | 4.9 | 6.1 | 5.4 | 4.9 | 5.1 |
apollo (2 cores) | 8.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 5.0 |
The code below plots the relative run times from the Colab notebook.
library(ggplot2)
library(ggrepel)
plotColors <- c("black", RColorBrewer::brewer.pal(n = 5, name = "Set1"), "gold")
benchmark <- runtimes %>%
ggplot(aes(x = numDraws, y = time_sec, color = package)) +
geom_line() +
geom_point() +
geom_text_repel(
data = . %>% filter(numDraws == max(numDraws)),
aes(label = package),
hjust = 0, nudge_x = 40, direction = "y",
size = 4.5, segment.size = 0
) +
scale_x_continuous(
limits = c(0, 1200),
breaks = numDraws,
labels = scales::comma) +
scale_y_continuous(limits = c(0, 300), breaks = seq(0, 300, 100)) +
scale_color_manual(values = plotColors) +
guides(
point = guide_legend(override.aes = list(label = "")),
color = guide_legend(override.aes = list(label = ""))) +
theme_bw(base_size = 18) +
theme(
panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
panel.grid.major.x = element_blank(),
legend.position = "none",
axis.line.x = element_blank(),
axis.ticks.x = element_blank()
) +
labs(
x = "Number of random draws",
y = "Computation time (seconds)"
)
benchmark
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.