The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
The mnet
package can be installed from Github using the
devtools
package:
# library(devtools)
# install_github("jmbh/mnet")
library(mnet)
To illustrate the permutation test for group differences in
multilevel VAR models we use simulated data that is included in the
mnet
package. The data consists of two groups with 100
subjects each, with time series of three variables of length 100 for
each subject. The data were generated from a mlVAR model in which one of
the cross-lagged effects (2->1) is different across groups.
data("ExampleData")
dim(ExampleData)
> [1] 20000 5
head(ExampleData)
> V1 V2 V3 id group
> 1 -0.5503574 2.3730731 -0.9546494 1 1
> 2 -0.8676930 2.6043886 0.1419776 1 1
> 3 -1.0098863 1.9953243 0.8989440 1 1
> 4 -2.2597404 1.5433871 0.2017678 1 1
> 5 -1.4791477 -0.3571881 -0.6923630 1 1
> 6 -0.6629657 -0.2803782 -0.1600937 1 1
The mlVAR_CG()
function implements the permutation test
and has the same input arguments as the mlVAR()
function
from the mlVAR
package, except that it requires two data
arguments for the two groups and requires specifying the number of
permutations the test should be based on. The more permutations, the
more precisely p-values can be computed.
We provide the two datasets to mlVAR_CG()
, and as in
mlVAR()
, we specify the column names of the variables that
should be modeled with the argument vars
and indicate the
column with the unique identifiers for each subject with the argument
idvar
. Finally, we indicate the column indicating the group
membership with the argument group
,
set.seed(1) # reproducibility
<- proc.time()[3]
timer
<- mlVAR_GC(data = ExampleData,
output vars = c("V1", "V2", "V3"),
idvar = "id",
groups = "group",
nCores = 1, # choose cores available on your machine
nP = 5, # Should be much more in practice, see preprint!
pbar = FALSE)
> Warning: executing %dopar% sequentially: no parallel backend registered
proc.time()[3] - timer
> elapsed
> 72.435
The perhaps most relevant output are the observed group differences
and their associated p-values. In the current version, we consider group
differences in between-person networks, in VAR networks (both fixed
effects and random effects standard deviation) and the contemporaneous
networks (both fixed effects and random effects standard deviation). The
observed group differences in all these networks can be found in
out$EmpDiffs
. All group differences are Group1 -
Group2.
$EmpDiffs
output> $Lagged_fixed
> , , 1
>
> V1 V2 V3
> V1 -0.00252620 -0.343710677 0.019928177
> V2 0.02702579 0.009729344 -0.002083037
> V3 -0.01797542 -0.010346780 -0.002122644
>
>
> $Lagged_random
> , , 1
>
> V1 V2 V3
> V1 -0.0001694804 0.033679705 -0.0133229
> V2 -0.0247214500 -0.017000309 0.0253878
> V3 -0.0199360377 -0.009975728 0.0285887
>
>
> $Contemp_fixed
> V1 V2 V3
> V1 0.000000000 -0.005761086 -0.01054800
> V2 -0.005761086 0.000000000 0.01351376
> V3 -0.010548003 0.013513757 0.00000000
>
> $Contemp_random
> V1 V2 V3
> V1 0.00000000 -0.00246086 0.01120576
> V2 -0.00246086 0.00000000 -0.04474056
> V3 0.01120576 -0.04474056 0.00000000
>
> $Between
> V1 V2 V3
> V1 0.0000000 -0.65312918 0.15266785
> V2 -0.6531292 0.00000000 0.06451328
> V3 0.1526679 0.06451328 0.00000000
The associated p-values can be found in
$Pval
output> $Lagged_fixed
> [,1] [,2] [,3]
> [1,] 0.8 0.0 0.4
> [2,] 0.0 0.8 1.0
> [3,] 0.8 0.6 1.0
>
> $Lagged_random
> [,1] [,2] [,3]
> [1,] 1.0 0.0 0.6
> [2,] 0.4 0.8 0.0
> [3,] 0.4 0.6 0.2
>
> $Contemp_fixed
> [,1] [,2] [,3]
> [1,] NA NA NA
> [2,] 0.6 NA NA
> [3,] 0.8 0.2 NA
>
> $Contemp_random
> [,1] [,2] [,3]
> [1,] NA NA NA
> [2,] 1 NA NA
> [3,] 1 0.8 NA
>
> $Between
> [,1] [,2] [,3]
> [1,] NA NA NA
> [2,] 0.0 NA NA
> [3,] 0.2 0.8 NA
For example, we see that the group difference for the cross lagged effect 2->1 is significant. Note that the p-value is here exactly zero, because we computed p-values based on empirical sampling distribution. If the test-statistic is far away from the mass of the sampling distribution under the null hypothesis (no group difference), then the density of the sampling distribution in this area is extremely low and therefore unlikely to be sampled. This leads to p-values that are exactly zero.
We can also inspect the exact sampling distributions. Let’s again consider the cross lagged effect 2->1:
hist(output$SampDist$Lagged_fixed[1,2,],
xlim=c(-.5, .5), main="", xlab="Parameter Value")
abline(v=output$EmpDiffs$Lagged_fixed[1,2,], col="orange")
legend("topright", legend="Test-statistic", text.col="orange", bty="n")
We see that the test-statistic is not even overlapping with the support sampling distribution, which gives a p-value of zero as discussed above.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.