The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.

Review new data

morts is a conservative framework to flag potential mortalities. This means that it can overestimate potential mortalities and some flagged mortalities may actually be alive. If new data are available - such as from receivers that were not previously available or an additional year in multiyear studies - movement of incorrectly flagged mortalities may be apparent.

In the example below, the data used to flag potential mortalities is to the left of the dashed line, and the new data are to the right of the dashed line. There is no station change evident for Fish G in the new data, so this fish is still considered a mortality. There is, however, a station change for Fish F, indicating this fish is still alive.

The review() function examines new data to determine if any animals move that were previously flagged as potential mortalities.

Using review()

Two input dataframes are mandatory for review():

  1. new.data - a dataframe with residence events generated from the new dataset

  2. morts - a dataframe of previously flagged mortalities

The new residence events in new.data must be generated using the same method as the original dataset, or must be manipulated to match the format of the original dataset. The format of new.data must also match the format of morts.

The other four required arguments, type, ID, station, and res.start, are specified in the same way as for morts() and infrequent(). See the Identifyig potential mortalities vignette for more information about these arguments.

review_example<-review(morts=morts,new.data=new.data,type="mort",
                       ID="ID",station="Station.Name")

If there are no station changes between the flagged mortalities and new.data, or among the residence events within new.data, then nothing is returned. If a station change is found, the residence event with the station change will be returned.

Using the example in the first figure, Fish G is not included in the output of review(), because it did not move since it was flagged as a mortality. Fish F is included in the output, because a station change was detected.

ResidenceStart Station.Name ID ResidenceEnd ResidenceLength.days
2006-11-16 19:31:00 27 F 2006-12-05 00:31:00 18.20833

The user can then review the station change to ensure it is valid before removing the animal from morts and including the animal in further analyses.

Including previous data

An optional input is old.data, which is the original dataset or a subset of the original dataset that includes any residence events that may have occurred between the flagged potential mortality and the beginning of new.data. It is strongly recommended to include old.data if backwards=TRUE when the mortalities were previously identified and/or if drift was applied (see Drift vignette for more information on applying drift).

review_example<-review(morts=morts,new.data=new.data,old.data=events,
                       type="mort",ID="ID",station="Station.Name")

Applying drift

There is the option to apply drift when using review(). If applying drift, the arguments ddd, from.station, and to.station must be provided. See Drift vignette for more information on these arguments. In addition, the arguments res.end, residences, and units must be provided. These arguments are not necessary for identifying station changes with no drift, but are called by the function when drift is applied.

drift_review<-review(morts=morts,new.data=new.data,old.data=old.data,
                     type="morts",ID="ID",station="Station.Name",
                     res.end="auto",residences="auto",units="auto",
                     ddd=ddd,from.station="From",to.station="To")

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.