The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.

Empirical comparison of P-value combination methods in mvMAPIT

library(mvMAPIT)
library(GGally)
library(tidyr)
library(dplyr)

In Stamp et al. (2023)1 we discuss the meta analysis of the pariwise comparison \(P\)-values that mvMAPIT gives. We provide three methods to compute a per-variant combined \(P\)-value:

  1. Fisher’s Method2
  2. The harmonic mean \(P\)3
  3. The Cauchy combination test4

The Fisher’s method requires independent \(P\)-values. The other two tests handle arbitrary covariances between the \(P\)-values. Here we show how these three methods compare empirically when applied to the same \(P\)-values.

Generate data

Draw random uniform \(P\)-values from [0, 0.05].

n_variants <- 10000
n_combine <- 3
pvalues <- tidyr::tibble(
   id = rep(as.character(c(1:n_variants)), each = n_combine),
   trait = rep(as.character(c(1:n_combine)), n_variants),
   p =  runif(n_variants * n_combine, min = 0, max = 1)
)

Combine \(P\)-Values with all methods

Use the provided methods to compute the meta analysis \(P\)-values.

cauchy <- cauchy_combined(pvalues) %>%
  rename(p_cauchy = p) %>%
  select(-trait)
fisher <- fishers_combined(pvalues) %>%
  rename(p_fisher = p) %>%
  select(-trait)
harmonic <- harmonic_combined(pvalues) %>%
  rename(p_harmonic = p) %>%
  select(-trait)
min_max <- pvalues %>%
  group_by(id) %>%
  summarise(p_min = min(p), p_max = max(p))

combined_wide <- fisher %>%
  left_join(harmonic) %>%
  left_join(cauchy) %>%
  left_join(min_max) %>%
  select(-id)
# Joining with `by = join_by(id)`
# Joining with `by = join_by(id)`
# Joining with `by = join_by(id)`

Plot the result

The figure shows the data distribution on the diagonal and paired 2D historgam plots for all combinations of \(P\)-values. The brighter yellows correspond to higher counts, the green is in the middle of the scale, and the darker blues correspond to the low values of the histogram.

my_bin <- function(data, mapping) {
  ggplot(data = data, mapping = mapping) +
  geom_bin2d() +
  scale_fill_continuous(type = "viridis")
}
ggpairs(combined_wide, columns = 1:5,
        lower = list(continuous = my_bin)) +
  theme_bw() +
  theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle=90, hjust=1))

References

  1. J. Stamp, A. DenAdel, D. Weinreich, L. Crawford (2023). Leveraging the Genetic Correlation between Traits Improves the Detection of Epistasis in Genome-wide Association Studies. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics, 13(8), jkad118; doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkad118↩︎

  2. Fisher, R.A. (1925). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd (Edinburgh). ISBN 0-05-002170-2.↩︎

  3. Wilson, D.J., 2019. The harmonic mean p-value for combining dependent tests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(4), pp.1195-1200. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814092116↩︎

  4. Liu, Y. and Xie, J., 2020. Cauchy combination test: a powerful test with analytic p-value calculation under arbitrary dependency structures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115(529), pp.393-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2018.1554485↩︎

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.