The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
This document shows examples for using the
tab_itemscale()
function of the sjPlot package.
This function performs an item analysis with certain statistics that are useful for scale or index development. Following statistics are computed for each variable (column) of a data frame:
Optional, following statistics can be computed as well:
If the argument factor.groups
is not
NULL
, the data frame df will be splitted into groups,
assuming that factor.groups
indicate those columns
(variables) of the data frame that belong to a certain factor (see, for
instance, return value of function tab_pca()
or
parameters::principal_components()
as example for
retrieving factor groups for a scale). This is useful when you have
perfomed a principal component analysis or factor analysis as first
step, and now want to see whether the found factors / components
represent a scale or index score.
To demonstrate this function, we first need some data:
The simplest function call is just passing the data frame as argument. In this case, the function assumes that all variables of the data frame belong to one factor only.
Row | Missings | Mean | SD | Skew | Item Difficulty | Item Discrimination | α if deleted | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
do you feel you cope well as caregiver? | 0.77 % | 3.12 | 0.58 | -0.12 | 0.78 | -0.24 | 0.54 | |
do you find caregiving too demanding? | 0.66 % | 2.02 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.33 | 0.38 | |
does caregiving cause difficulties in your relationship with your friends? | 0.66 % | 1.63 | 0.87 | 1.31 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.34 | |
does caregiving have negative effect on your physical health? | 1.10 % | 1.77 | 0.87 | 1.06 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.32 | |
does caregiving cause difficulties in your relationship with your family? | 0.66 % | 1.39 | 0.67 | 1.77 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.38 | |
does caregiving cause financial difficulties? | 0.88 % | 1.29 | 0.64 | 2.43 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.37 | |
do you feel trapped in your role as caregiver? | 0.88 % | 1.92 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.48 | 0.37 | 0.35 | |
do you feel supported by friends/neighbours? | 0.77 % | 2.16 | 1.04 | 0.32 | 0.54 | -0.03 | 0.53 | |
do you feel caregiving worthwhile? | 2.20 % | 2.93 | 0.96 | -0.45 | 0.73 | -0.11 | 0.56 | |
Mean inter-item-correlation=0.092 · Cronbach’s α=0.459 |
To interprete the output, we may consider following values as rule-of-thumbs for indicating a reliable scale:
The items of the COPE index used for our example do not represent a
single factor. We can check this, for instance, with a principle
component analysis. If you know, which variable belongs to which factor
(i.e. which variable is part of which component), you can pass a numeric
vector with these group indices to the argument
factor.groups
. In this case, the data frame is divided into
the components specified by factor.groups
, and each
component (or factor) is analysed.
library(parameters)
# Compute PCA on Cope-Index, and retrieve
# factor indices for each COPE index variable
pca <- parameters::principal_components(mydf)
factor.groups <- parameters::closest_component(pca)
The PCA extracted two components. Now tab_itemscale()
…
tab_itemscale(mydf, factor.groups)
#> Warning: Data frame needs at least three columns for reliability-test.
Row | Missings | Mean | SD | Skew | Item Difficulty | Item Discrimination | α if deleted | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
do you feel you cope well as caregiver? | 0.77 % | 3.12 | 0.58 | -0.12 | 0.78 | -0.37 | 0.78 | |
do you find caregiving too demanding? | 0.66 % | 2.02 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.61 | |
does caregiving cause difficulties in your relationship with your friends? | 0.66 % | 1.63 | 0.87 | 1.31 | 0.41 | 0.55 | 0.59 | |
does caregiving have negative effect on your physical health? | 1.10 % | 1.77 | 0.87 | 1.06 | 0.44 | 0.54 | 0.59 | |
does caregiving cause difficulties in your relationship with your family? | 0.66 % | 1.39 | 0.67 | 1.77 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.63 | |
does caregiving cause financial difficulties? | 0.88 % | 1.29 | 0.64 | 2.43 | 0.32 | 0.47 | 0.62 | |
do you feel trapped in your role as caregiver? | 0.88 % | 1.92 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.58 | |
Mean inter-item-correlation=0.196 · Cronbach’s α=0.676 |
Row | Missings | Mean | SD | Skew | Item Difficulty | Item Discrimination | α if deleted | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
do you feel supported by friends/neighbours? | 0.77 % | 2.16 | 1.04 | 0.32 | 0.54 | NA | NA | |
do you feel caregiving worthwhile? | 2.20 % | 2.93 | 0.96 | -0.45 | 0.73 | NA | NA | |
Mean inter-item-correlation=0.260 · Cronbach’s α=0.412 |
Component 1 | Component 2 | |
---|---|---|
Component 1 | α=0.676 | |
Component 2 |
-0.196 (<.001) |
α=0.412 |
Computed correlation used pearson-method with listwise-deletion. |
tab_itemscale(mydf, factor.groups, show.shapiro = TRUE, show.kurtosis = TRUE)
#> Warning: Data frame needs at least three columns for reliability-test.
Row | Missings | Mean | SD | Skew | Kurtosis | W(p) | Item Difficulty | Item Discrimination | α if deleted | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
do you feel you cope well as caregiver? | 0.77 % | 3.12 | 0.58 | -0.12 | 0.27 | 0.75 (0.000) | 0.78 | -0.37 | 0.78 | |
do you find caregiving too demanding? | 0.66 % | 2.02 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.80 (0.000) | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.61 | |
does caregiving cause difficulties in your relationship with your friends? | 0.66 % | 1.63 | 0.87 | 1.31 | 0.86 | 0.72 (0.000) | 0.41 | 0.55 | 0.59 | |
does caregiving have negative effect on your physical health? | 1.10 % | 1.77 | 0.87 | 1.06 | 0.48 | 0.78 (0.000) | 0.44 | 0.54 | 0.59 | |
does caregiving cause difficulties in your relationship with your family? | 0.66 % | 1.39 | 0.67 | 1.77 | 2.87 | 0.62 (0.000) | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.63 | |
does caregiving cause financial difficulties? | 0.88 % | 1.29 | 0.64 | 2.43 | 5.77 | 0.51 (0.000) | 0.32 | 0.47 | 0.62 | |
do you feel trapped in your role as caregiver? | 0.88 % | 1.92 | 0.91 | 0.83 | -0.08 | 0.81 (0.000) | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.58 | |
Mean inter-item-correlation=0.196 · Cronbach’s α=0.676 |
Row | Missings | Mean | SD | Skew | Kurtosis | W(p) | Item Difficulty | Item Discrimination | α if deleted | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
do you feel supported by friends/neighbours? | 0.77 % | 2.16 | 1.04 | 0.32 | -1.14 | 0.85 (0.000) | 0.54 | NA | NA | |
do you feel caregiving worthwhile? | 2.20 % | 2.93 | 0.96 | -0.45 | -0.83 | 0.85 (0.000) | 0.73 | NA | NA | |
Mean inter-item-correlation=0.260 · Cronbach’s α=0.412 |
Component 1 | Component 2 | |
---|---|---|
Component 1 | α=0.676 | |
Component 2 |
-0.196 (<.001) |
α=0.412 |
Computed correlation used pearson-method with listwise-deletion. |
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.