The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.

superb: Summary plots with adjusted error bars

CRAN Status

The library superb offers two main functionalities. First, it can be used to obtain plots with adjusted error bars. The main function is superb() but you can also use superbShiny() for a graphical user interface requiring no programming nor scripting. See the nice tutorial by Walker (2021).

The purpose of superb() is to provide a plot with summary statistics and correct error bars. With simple adjustments, the error bar are adjusted to the design (within or between), to the purpose (single or pair-wise differences), to the sampling method (simple randomized samples or cluster randomized samples) and to the population size (infinite or of a specific size). The superbData() function does not generate the plot but returns the summary statistics and the interval boundaries. These can afterwards be sent to other plotting environment.

The second functionality is to generate random datasets. The function GRD() is used to easily generate random data from any design (within or between) using any population distribution with any parameters, and with various effect sizes. GRD() is useful to test statistical procedures and plotting procedures such as superb().

Installation

The official CRAN version can be installed with

install.packages("superb")
library(superb)

The development version 0.95.19 can be accessed through GitHub:

devtools::install_github("dcousin3/superb")
library(superb)

Examples

The easiest is to use the graphical interface which can be launched with

superbShiny()

The following examples use the script-based commands.

Here is a simple example illustrating the ToothGrowth dataset of rats (in which the dependent variable is len) as a function of the dose of vitamin and the form of the vitamin supplements supp (pills or juice)

superb(len ~ dose + supp, ToothGrowth )

In the above, the default summary statistic, the mean, is used. The error bars are, by default, the 95% confidence intervals (of the mean). These two choices can be changed with the statistic and the errorbar arguments.

This second example explicitly indicates to display the median instead of the default mean summary statistics along with the default 95% confidence interval of the median here (the correct function is automatically selected):

superb(len ~ dose + supp, ToothGrowth,
    statistic = "median")

As a third example, we illustrate the harmonic means hmean along with 99.9% confidence intervals of the harmonic mean displayed using lines:

superb(len ~ dose + supp, ToothGrowth,
    statistic = "hmean", 
    errorbar = "CI", gamma = 0.999,
    plotStyle = "line")

The second function, GRD(), can be used to generate random data from designs with various within- and between-subject factors. This example generates scores for 300 simulated participants in a 3 x 6 design with 6 daily repeated-measures on Days. Only the factor Day is modeled as impacting the scores (increasing by 3 points on the second day):

set.seed(663) # for reproducibility
testdata <- GRD(
    RenameDV   = "score", 
    SubjectsPerGroup = 10, 
    BSFactors  = "Difficulty(A,B,C)", 
    WSFactors  = "Day(6)",
    Population = list(mean = 75,stddev = 10,rho = 0.8),
    Effects    = list( "Difficulty" =  custom(-5,-5,+10), "Day" = slope(3) )
) 
head(testdata)
##   id Difficulty  score.1  score.2  score.3  score.4  score.5  score.6
## 1  1          A 61.72393 61.48460 70.48406 68.92430 69.85908 68.15339
## 2  2          A 54.16784 65.82688 66.51785 65.59598 82.74906 82.53300
## 3  3          A 69.85369 60.04088 73.99657 72.95358 69.89209 74.30423
## 4  4          A 69.05319 64.99568 75.00310 78.35253 81.48167 76.08335
## 5  5          A 79.29388 81.56254 78.17444 86.36108 92.45310 93.73091
## 6  6          A 56.56657 59.23395 66.10074 63.77299 67.07331 72.64133

This is here that the full benefits of superb() is seen: with just a few adjustments, you can obtained decorrelated error bars with the Correlation-adjusted (CA), the Cousineau-Morey (CM) or the Loftus & Masson (CM) techniques:

library(gridExtra)          # for grid.arrange
## Warning: package 'gridExtra' was built under R version 4.3.3
library(RColorBrewer)       # for nicer color palette
## Warning: package 'RColorBrewer' was built under R version 4.3.1
plt1 <- superb( crange(score.1, score.6) ~ Difficulty, 
    testdata, WSFactors = "Day(6)",
    plotStyle = "line"
) + ylim(50,100) + labs(title = "No adjustments") +
theme_bw() + ylab("Score") +
scale_color_brewer(palette="Dark2")
    
plt2 <- superb( crange(score.1, score.6) ~ Difficulty, 
    testdata, WSFactors = "Day(6)",
    adjustments = list(purpose = "difference", decorrelation = "CA"),
    plotStyle = "line"
)+ ylim(50,100) + labs(title = "correlation- and difference-adjusted") +
theme_bw() + ylab("Score") +
scale_color_brewer(palette="Dark2")

grid.arrange(plt1,plt2, ncol=2)

Even better, the simulated scores can be illustrated using using a more elaborated layout, the pointjitter which, in addition to the mean and confidence interval, shows the raw data using jitter dots:

superb( crange(score.1, score.6) ~ Difficulty, 
    testdata, WSFactors = "Day(6)",
    adjustments = list(purpose = "difference", decorrelation = "CM"),
    plotStyle = "pointjitter",
    errorbarParams = list(color = "purple"),
    pointParams = list( size = 3, color = "purple")
) +
theme_bw() + ylab("Score") +
scale_color_brewer(palette="Dark2")

In the above example, optional arguments errorbarParams and pointParams are used to inject specifications in the error bars and the points respectively. When these arguments are used, they override the defaults from superb().

Lastly, we could aim for a radar (a.k.a. circular) plot with

superb( crange(score.1, score.6) ~ Difficulty, testdata, 
    WSFactors = "Day(6)",
    adjustments = list(purpose = "difference", decorrelation = "CM"),
    plotStyle = "circularpointlinejitter",
    factorOrder = c("Day", "Difficulty"),
    pointParams = list( size = 3 ),
    jitterParams = list(alpha=0.25),
    errorbarParams= list(width=0.33, color = "black")
) +
theme_bw() + ylab("") +
theme(panel.border = element_blank(), text = element_text(size = 16) ) +
scale_color_brewer(palette="Dark2") +
theme(axis.line.y = element_blank(), 
axis.text.y=element_blank(), axis.ticks.y=element_blank())

Every time, you get error bars for free! no need to compute them on the side, no need to worry about the adjustments (whether you want stand-alone error bars or adjusted for purpose or correlation, it is all just one option). Also, keep in mind that it is easy to change the default (mean +- 95% confidence intervals) to any other summary statistics –e.g., median– and any other measure of error –e.g., standard error, standard deviation, inter-quartile range, name it–; you can find some responses in the vignettes or on stackExchange or just open an issue on the github repository.

For more

superb is for summary plot with error bar, as simple as that.

The library superb makes it easy to illustrate summary statistics along with the error bars. Some layouts can be used to visualize additional characteristics of the raw data. Finally, the resulting appearance can be customized in various ways.

The complete documentation is available on this site.

A general introduction to the superb framework underlying this library is published at Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Sciences (Cousineau, Goulet, & Harding, 2021). Also, most of the formulas for confidence intervals when statistics other than the mean are displayed can be found in Harding, Tremblay, & Cousineau (2015).

References

Cousineau D, Goulet M, Harding B (2021). “Summary plots with adjusted error bars: The superb framework with an implementation in R.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2021, 1–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211035109

Walker, J. A. L. (2021). “Summary plots with adjusted error bars (superb).” Youtube video, accessible here.

Cousineau, D., Goulet, M.-A., & Harding, B. (2021). Summary plots with adjusted error bars: The superb framework with an implementation in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211035109
Harding, B., Tremblay, C., & Cousineau, D. (2014). Standard errors: A review and evaluation of standard error estimators using monte carlo simulations. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 10(2), 107–123.
Harding, B., Tremblay, C., & Cousineau, D. (2015). The standard error of the pearson skew. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 11(1), 32–36.
Walker, J. A. L. (2021). Summary plots with adjusted error bars (superb). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw_6ll5nVus

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.