The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.

Introduction to theftdlc

Trent Henderson

2024-10-04

library(dplyr)
library(ggplot2)
library(theft)
library(theftdlc)

Purpose

The theft package for R facilitates user-friendly access to a structured analytical workflow for the extraction of time-series features from six different feature sets (or a set of user-supplied features): "catch22", "feasts", "Kats", "tsfeatures", "tsfresh", and "TSFEL" theftdlc extends this feature-based ecosystem by providing a suite of functions for analysing, interpreting, and visualising time-series features calculated using theft.

Core calculation functions

To explore package functionality, we are going to use a dataset that comes standard with theft called simData. This dataset contains a collection of randomly generated time series for six different types of processes. The dataset can be accessed via:

theft::simData

The data follows the following structure:

head(simData)
#>                      values timepoint               id        process
#> Gaussian Noise.1 -0.6264538         1 Gaussian Noise_1 Gaussian Noise
#> Gaussian Noise.2  0.1836433         2 Gaussian Noise_1 Gaussian Noise
#> Gaussian Noise.3 -0.8356286         3 Gaussian Noise_1 Gaussian Noise
#> Gaussian Noise.4  1.5952808         4 Gaussian Noise_1 Gaussian Noise
#> Gaussian Noise.5  0.3295078         5 Gaussian Noise_1 Gaussian Noise
#> Gaussian Noise.6 -0.8204684         6 Gaussian Noise_1 Gaussian Noise

We will use theft to quickly calculate features using the catch22 set:

feature_matrix <- calculate_features(data = simData, 
                                     id_var = "id", 
                                     time_var = "timepoint", 
                                     values_var = "values", 
                                     group_var = "process", 
                                     feature_set = "catch22",
                                     seed = 123)

Data quality checks

The core calculate_features function in theft returns an object of class feature_calculations. Objects of this type are purposefully looked-for by other functions in theftdlc. Because it is a class, simple methods such as plot() can be called on the object to produce a range of statistical graphics. The first is a visualisation of the data types of the calculated feature vectors. This is useful for inspecting which features might need to be dropped due to large proportions of undesirable (e.g., NA, NaN etc.) values. We can specify the plot type = "quality to make this graphic:

plot(feature_matrix, type = "quality")

Data visualisation and low-dimensional projections

The package also comes with additional statistical and graphical functionality:

Feature matrices

The function calling type = "matrix" in plot() on a feature_calculations object takes it and produces a ggplot object heatmap showing the feature vectors across the x axis and each time series down the y axis. Prior to plotting, the function hierarchically clusters the data across both rows and columns to visually highlight the empirical structure. Note that you have several options for the hierarchical clustering linkage algorithm to use:

See the hclust documentation for more information.

Note that the legend for this plot (and other matrix visualisations in theftdlc) have been discretised for visual clarity as continuous legends can be difficult to interpret meaningful value differences easily.

plot(feature_matrix, type = "matrix", norm_method = "RobustSigmoid")

You can control the normalisation type with the norm_method argument, whether to rescale to the unit interval after normalisation with the unit_int argument. norm_method and all normalisation of feature vectors in theftdlc is handled by the normaliseR package. You can also control the hierarchical clustering method with the clust_method argument (the example above used defaults so manual specification was not needed).

Individual feature distributions

Plotting the entire feature matrix is useful, but sometimes we wish to understand the distributions of individual features. This is particularly useful if there are different groups in your data (such as in a time-series classification context). We can again use the plot() generic here to draw violin plots through setting type = "violin". Note that for violin plots, we also need to tell the function which features we wish to plot (i.e., a vector of characters specifying feature names from the names column in your feature_calculations object). For simplicity, we will just plot two random features from catch22 here:

plot(feature_matrix, type = "violin",
     feature_names = c("CO_f1ecac", "PD_PeriodicityWang_th0_01"))

Note that when using these defined plot() generics, you can pass any additional arguments to certain geoms to control the plot look through the ... argument in the plot() function. Below is a guide to where these arguments go depending on the plot type:

For example, we may wish to control the point size and transparency in the above plot (not rendered here for space):

plot(feature_matrix, type = "violin",
     feature_names = c("CO_f1ecac", "PD_PeriodicityWang_th0_01"),
     size = 0.7, alpha = 0.9)

Low dimensional projections

Low-dimensional projections are a useful tool for visualising the structure of high-dimensional datasets in low-dimensional spaces. In machine learning for time-series data, we are often interested in representing a time-series dataset in a two-dimensional projection of the high-dimensional feature space. This projection which can reveal structure in the dataset, including how different labeled classes are organized.

The theftdlc function project takes the feature_calculations object and performs one of the following dimension reduction techniques on it to reduce its dimensionality to a bivariate state which can then be easily plotted:

The result is stored in a custom object class called feature_projection. project takes the following arguments:

project returns an object of class feature_projection which is essentially a named list comprised of four elements:

  1. "Data"—the feature_calculations object supplied to project
  2. "ModelData"—the wide matrix of filtered data supplied to the model fit
  3. "ProjectedData"—a tidy data.frame of the two-dimensional embedding
  4. "ModelFit"—the raw model object from the dimensionality reduction algorithm
low_dim <- project(feature_matrix,
                   norm_method = "RobustSigmoid",
                   unit_int = TRUE,
                   low_dim_method = "PCA",
                   seed = 123)

We can similarly call plot() on this object to produce a two-dimensional scatterplot of the results:

plot(low_dim)

As another example, a t-SNE version can be specified in a similar fashion, with any function parameters for the method supplied to the ... argument to project. Shaded covariance ellipses can also be disabled when plotting feature_projection objects by setting show_covariance = FALSE. Here is an example where we modify the perplexity of the t-SNE algorithm:

low_dim2 <- project(feature_matrix,
                    norm_method = "RobustSigmoid",
                    unit_int = TRUE,
                    low_dim_method = "tSNE",
                    perplexity = 10,
                    seed = 123)

plot(low_dim2, show_covariance = FALSE)

Pairwise correlations

You can plot correlations between feature vectors using plot(type = "cor") on a feature_calculations object:

plot(feature_matrix, type = "cor")

Similarly, you can control the normalisation type with the norm_method argument and the hierarchical clustering method with the clust_method argument (the example above used defaults so manual specification was not needed).

Time-series classification

Feature-by-feature

Since feature-based time-series analysis has shown particular promise for classification problems, theftdlc includes functionality for exploring group separation. The function classify enables you to fit a range of classification models to enable statistical comparisons using the resampling methodology presented in this paper for a detailed review1. This function is meant to serve as a fast answer that can be used to guide analysis and not a replacement for the development of a careful statistical pipeline. classify has the following arguments:

Since we are interested in individual features in this section, we will calculate both main and null results for each feature using just 5 resamples for efficiency (in practice, we would use more!) with the default linear SVM:

feature_classifiers <- classify(feature_matrix,
                                by_set = FALSE,
                                n_resamples = 5,
                                use_null = TRUE)

To show you how simple it is to specify a different classifier, we can instead maybe use a radial basis function SVM (though you are absolutely not limited to just e1071 models! You can use anything that can be used with R’s predict generic as classify internally constructs confusion matrices from model predictions):

myclassifier <- function(formula, data){
  mod <- e1071::svm(formula, data = data, kernel = "radial", scale = FALSE,
                    probability = TRUE)
}

feature_classifiers_radial <- classify(feature_matrix,
                                       classifier = myclassifier,
                                       by_set = FALSE,
                                       n_resamples = 5,
                                       use_null = TRUE)

While have raw classification results is useful, we often also would like to statistical evaluate some facet of it. theftdlc includes the function compare_features for doing this. compare_features contains the following arguments:

We can use compare_features to evaluate how well each individual feature performs relative to its empirical null distribution (noting that we are using the defaults for the other arguments for code cleanliness):

feature_vs_null <- compare_features(feature_classifiers,
                                    by_set = FALSE,
                                    hypothesis = "null")

head(feature_vs_null)
#>                                                 hypothesis
#> 1 catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff != own null
#> 2                       catch22_CO_FirstMin_ac != own null
#> 3             catch22_CO_HistogramAMI_even_2_5 != own null
#> 4                            catch22_CO_f1ecac != own null
#> 5                        catch22_CO_trev_1_num != own null
#> 6                  catch22_DN_HistogramMode_10 != own null
#>                                          names
#> 1 catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff
#> 2                       catch22_CO_FirstMin_ac
#> 3             catch22_CO_HistogramAMI_even_2_5
#> 4                            catch22_CO_f1ecac
#> 5                        catch22_CO_trev_1_num
#> 6                  catch22_DN_HistogramMode_10
#>                         original_names feature_set   metric feature_mean
#> 1 CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff     catch22 accuracy   0.40444444
#> 2                       CO_FirstMin_ac     catch22 accuracy   0.31111111
#> 3             CO_HistogramAMI_even_2_5     catch22 accuracy   0.29777778
#> 4                            CO_f1ecac     catch22 accuracy   0.29777778
#> 5                        CO_trev_1_num     catch22 accuracy   0.11111111
#> 6                  DN_HistogramMode_10     catch22 accuracy   0.08444444
#>    null_mean t_statistic     p.value
#> 1 0.12000000    4.894202 0.004038794
#> 2 0.09777778    2.317462 0.040681479
#> 3 0.10666667    2.007068 0.057591771
#> 4 0.09777778    2.371708 0.038339070
#> 5 0.07111111    3.674235 0.010655821
#> 6 0.06666667    0.560112 0.302643313

Or to conduct pairwise comparisons between individual features:

pairwise_features <- compare_features(feature_classifiers,
                                      by_set = FALSE,
                                      hypothesis = "pairwise",
                                      p_adj = "holm")

head(pairwise_features)
#>                                                                         hypothesis
#> 1           catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff != catch22_CO_FirstMin_ac
#> 2 catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff != catch22_CO_HistogramAMI_even_2_5
#> 3                catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff != catch22_CO_f1ecac
#> 4            catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff != catch22_CO_trev_1_num
#> 5      catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff != catch22_DN_HistogramMode_10
#> 6       catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff != catch22_DN_HistogramMode_5
#>                                        names_a                          names_b
#> 1 catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff           catch22_CO_FirstMin_ac
#> 2 catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff catch22_CO_HistogramAMI_even_2_5
#> 3 catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff                catch22_CO_f1ecac
#> 4 catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff            catch22_CO_trev_1_num
#> 5 catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff      catch22_DN_HistogramMode_10
#> 6 catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff       catch22_DN_HistogramMode_5
#>     metric names_a_mean names_b_mean t_statistic      p.value p_value_adj
#> 1 accuracy    0.4044444   0.31111111    3.500000 0.0124480817  1.00000000
#> 2 accuracy    0.4044444   0.29777778    2.449490 0.0352419985  1.00000000
#> 3 accuracy    0.4044444   0.29777778    5.237229 0.0031761284  0.46053861
#> 4 accuracy    0.4044444   0.11111111    9.241849 0.0003810008  0.07467616
#> 5 accuracy    0.4044444   0.08444444    6.743418 0.0012602882  0.21676958
#> 6 accuracy    0.4044444   0.06222222   15.717559 0.0000478576  0.01076796

We can then use ggplot2 to summarise and visualise our results. Here is a pairwise correlation plot between the top 10 features in catch22 for this toy problem. We are just simply filtering the original full feature data and making use of the plot generic defined for objects of class feature_calculations:

top_10 <- feature_vs_null %>%
  dplyr::slice_min(p.value, n = 10) %>%
  dplyr::select(c(feature_set, original_names, p.value))

feature_matrix_filt <- feature_matrix %>%
  dplyr::filter(feature_set %in% top_10$feature_set & names %in% top_10$original_names)

feature_matrix_filt <- structure(feature_matrix_filt, class = c("feature_calculations", "data.frame"))
plot(feature_matrix_filt, type = "cor")

We can also easily draw a violin plot of the top 10 features to visualise the distributions by group:

plot(feature_matrix_filt,
     type = "violin",
     feature_names = top_10$original_names)

Finally, theftdlc also contains a function interval for summarising the results of classify. interval takes the following arguments:

We can evidently use interval to produce a variety of different summaries for us. For example, we might wish to compute the \(\pm1\) SD interval for each feature’s main model classification accuracy values (note that the defaults for the function do this for us, so we only need to set by_set = FALSE manually):

interval(feature_classifiers, by_set = FALSE)
#>                                                  names      .mean     .lower
#> 1         catch22_CO_Embed2_Dist_tau_d_expfit_meandiff 0.40444444 0.38585200
#> 2                               catch22_CO_FirstMin_ac 0.31111111 0.28888889
#> 3                     catch22_CO_HistogramAMI_even_2_5 0.29777778 0.26407611
#> 4                                    catch22_CO_f1ecac 0.29777778 0.27790162
#> 5                                catch22_CO_trev_1_num 0.11111111 0.09539763
#> 6                          catch22_DN_HistogramMode_10 0.08444444 0.05547021
#> 7                           catch22_DN_HistogramMode_5 0.06222222 0.05228414
#> 8                catch22_DN_OutlierInclude_n_001_mdrmd 0.05777778 0.04560617
#> 9                catch22_DN_OutlierInclude_p_001_mdrmd 0.06222222 0.02246990
#> 10              catch22_FC_LocalSimple_mean1_tauresrat 0.28888889 0.25746192
#> 11                 catch22_FC_LocalSimple_mean3_stderr 0.50222222 0.47688499
#> 12     catch22_IN_AutoMutualInfoStats_40_gaussian_fmmi 0.29333333 0.27474089
#> 13                        catch22_MD_hrv_classic_pnn40 0.25333333 0.18931173
#> 14                   catch22_PD_PeriodicityWang_th0_01 0.15111111 0.13251867
#> 15            catch22_SB_BinaryStats_diff_longstretch0 0.33333333 0.28121760
#> 16            catch22_SB_BinaryStats_mean_longstretch1 0.35111111 0.30836581
#> 17                   catch22_SB_MotifThree_quantile_hh 0.46222222 0.43324799
#> 18          catch22_SB_TransitionMatrix_3ac_sumdiagcov 0.32000000 0.27391902
#> 19      catch22_SC_FluctAnal_2_dfa_50_1_2_logi_prop_r1 0.08444444 0.06010122
#> 20 catch22_SC_FluctAnal_2_rsrangefit_50_1_logi_prop_r1 0.25333333 0.22799610
#> 21            catch22_SP_Summaries_welch_rect_area_5_1 0.60000000 0.56486358
#> 22            catch22_SP_Summaries_welch_rect_centroid 0.53333333 0.50611678
#>        .upper
#> 1  0.42303689
#> 2  0.33333333
#> 3  0.33147945
#> 4  0.31765394
#> 5  0.12682460
#> 6  0.11341868
#> 7  0.07216030
#> 8  0.06994939
#> 9  0.10197454
#> 10 0.32031586
#> 11 0.52755945
#> 12 0.31192578
#> 13 0.31735493
#> 14 0.16970356
#> 15 0.38544906
#> 16 0.39385641
#> 17 0.49119646
#> 18 0.36608098
#> 19 0.10878767
#> 20 0.27867057
#> 21 0.63513642
#> 22 0.56054989

Multi-feature

Since theft contains entire sets of features, we can also use classify to compare them at the set level through the by_set argument. Let’s try both catch22 and a custom set of just mean and standard deviation:

feature_matrix2 <- calculate_features(data = simData, 
                                      group_var = "process", 
                                      feature_set = "catch22",
                                      features = list("mean" = mean, "sd" = sd),
                                      seed = 123)

set_classifiers <- classify(feature_matrix2,
                            by_set = TRUE,
                            n_resamples = 5,
                            use_null = TRUE)

head(set_classifiers)
#> $TrainTestSizes
#> train_size  test_size 
#>        135         45 
#> 
#> $ClassificationResults
#>    model_type resample   accuracy mean_precision mean_recall mean_f1_score
#> 1        Main        1 0.86666667     0.90235690  0.90235690     0.9000000
#> 2        Main        2 0.84444444     0.88047138  0.88194444     0.8806479
#> 3        Main        3 0.80000000     0.84785354  0.82702020     0.8317460
#> 4        Main        4 0.82222222     0.86195286  0.86446886     0.8611111
#> 5        Main        5 0.86666667     0.89562290  0.90109890     0.8958333
#> 6        Null        1 0.15555556     0.16734007  0.15575397     0.2266282
#> 7        Null        2 0.13333333     0.18518519  0.10370370     0.3771930
#> 8        Null        3 0.06666667     0.10404040  0.07936508     0.1444444
#> 9        Null        4 0.24444444     0.26153199  0.27103175     0.2406925
#> 10       Null        5 0.24444444     0.22853535  0.23164683     0.2714130
#> 11       Main        1 0.71111111     0.79629630  0.83285714     0.8658046
#> 12       Main        2 0.73333333     0.81481481  0.85666667     0.8941914
#> 13       Main        3 0.68888889     0.77546296  0.78285714     0.8238998
#> 14       Main        4 0.71111111     0.79629630  0.83285714     0.8658046
#> 15       Main        5 0.68888889     0.77777778  0.81500000     0.8379841
#> 16       Null        1 0.00000000     0.00000000  0.00000000           NaN
#> 17       Null        2 0.28888889     0.35416667  0.35294118     0.4358312
#> 18       Null        3 0.04444444     0.04166667  0.20000000     0.4000000
#> 19       Null        4 0.11111111     0.20833333  0.26923077     0.2714286
#> 20       Null        5 0.11111111     0.16666667  0.06410256     0.2272727
#> 21       Main        1 0.68888889     0.72727273  0.68398268     0.6865741
#> 22       Main        2 0.62222222     0.59764310  0.60178710     0.7068449
#> 23       Main        3 0.75555556     0.80744949  0.75476190     0.7578947
#> 24       Main        4 0.77777778     0.79124579  0.77167508     0.7766106
#> 25       Main        5 0.68888889     0.76430976  0.70138889     0.7086835
#> 26       Null        1 0.17777778     0.19730640  0.19444444     0.3869031
#> 27       Null        2 0.08888889     0.10774411  0.08215488     0.1638889
#> 28       Null        3 0.08888889     0.08552189  0.12500000     0.1939394
#> 29       Null        4 0.26666667     0.24532828  0.27420635     0.3099160
#> 30       Null        5 0.17777778     0.15172559  0.14587496     0.2203209
#>     feature_set
#> 1  All features
#> 2  All features
#> 3  All features
#> 4  All features
#> 5  All features
#> 6  All features
#> 7  All features
#> 8  All features
#> 9  All features
#> 10 All features
#> 11         User
#> 12         User
#> 13         User
#> 14         User
#> 15         User
#> 16         User
#> 17         User
#> 18         User
#> 19         User
#> 20         User
#> 21      catch22
#> 22      catch22
#> 23      catch22
#> 24      catch22
#> 25      catch22
#> 26      catch22
#> 27      catch22
#> 28      catch22
#> 29      catch22
#> 30      catch22

Note that classify constructs a set of "All features" (i.e., all features across all computed sets) automatically when \(>2\) unique feature sets are detected in the feature data. Similar to the individual feature case, we can also use interval combined with ggplot2 to summarise our findings. Here is a comparison of mean accuracy \(\pm 1SD\) between feature sets:

interval_calcs <- interval(set_classifiers)

interval_calcs %>%
  ggplot2::ggplot(ggplot2::aes(x = reorder(feature_set, -.mean), y = .mean,
                               colour = feature_set)) +
  ggplot2::geom_errorbar(ggplot2::aes(ymin = .lower, ymax = .upper)) +
  ggplot2::geom_point(size = 5) +
  ggplot2::labs(x = "Feature set",
                y = "Classification accuracy") +
  ggplot2::scale_colour_brewer(palette = "Dark2") +
  ggplot2::theme_bw() +
  ggplot2::theme(legend.position = "none",
                 panel.grid.minor = ggplot2::element_blank())

Cluster analysis

theftdlc also supports quick and simple cluster analysis using either \(k\)-means, hierarchical clustering, or Gaussian mixture models through the cluster function. cluster takes a few similar key arguments to other theftdlc functions (though defaults are set for all, and so only data is required for cluster to work):

cluster returns an object of class feature_clusters which is essentially a named list comprised of two elements:

  1. "Data"—the feature_calculations object supplied to cluster with the cluster label appended
  2. "ModelFit"—the raw model object from the clustering algorithm

We can easily fit a \(k\)-means model with k = 6 (since theft::simData contains data for six different temporal processes):

feature_clusters <- cluster(feature_matrix, k = 6)

From here, it’s easy to do any further analysis or data visualisation:

feature_clusters$Data %>%
    dplyr::filter(names %in% c("CO_HistogramAMI_even_2_5", 
                               "DN_OutlierInclude_p_001_mdrmd")) %>%
    tidyr::pivot_wider(id_cols = c("id", "group", "cluster"), 
                       names_from = "names", values_from = "values") %>%
    ggplot2::ggplot(ggplot2::aes(x = CO_HistogramAMI_even_2_5, 
                                 DN_OutlierInclude_p_001_mdrmd, 
                                 colour = as.factor(cluster))) +
    ggplot2::stat_ellipse(ggplot2::aes(fill = as.factor(cluster)), geom = "polygon", alpha = 0.2) +
    ggplot2::geom_point() +
    ggplot2::labs(colour = "Cluster") +
    ggplot2::guides(fill = "none") +
    ggplot2::scale_fill_brewer(palette = "Dark2") +
    ggplot2::scale_colour_brewer(palette = "Dark2") +
    ggplot2::theme_bw() +
    ggplot2::theme(legend.position = "bottom",
                   panel.grid.minor = ggplot2::element_blank())


  1. T. Henderson, A. G., Bryant, and B. D. Fulcher, “Never a Dull Moment: Distributional Properties as a Baseline for Time-Series Classification”, 27th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2023.↩︎

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.