The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
While plot_smooths()
offers a streamlined way of
plotting predicted smooths from a GAM model (see
vignette("plot-smooths", package = "tidymv")
), it is too
constrained for other more complex cases.
The most general solution is to get the predicted values of the outcome variable according to all the combinations of terms in the model and use this dataframe for plotting. This method grants the user maximum control over what can be plotted and how to transform the data (if necessary).
I will illustrate how to use the function predict_gam()
to create a prediction dataframe and how this dataframe can be used for
plotting different cases.
Let’s load the necessary packages.
First of all let’s generate some simulated data and create a GAM
model with a factor by
variable.
library(mgcv)
set.seed(10)
data <- gamSim(4, 400)
#> Factor `by' variable example
model <- gam(
y ~
fac +
s(x2, by = fac),
data = data
)
summary(model)
#>
#> Family: gaussian
#> Link function: identity
#>
#> Formula:
#> y ~ fac + s(x2, by = fac)
#>
#> Parametric coefficients:
#> Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
#> (Intercept) 1.2219 0.1634 7.478 5.17e-13 ***
#> fac2 -1.7395 0.2376 -7.322 1.44e-12 ***
#> fac3 2.2505 0.2301 9.779 < 2e-16 ***
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#>
#> Approximate significance of smooth terms:
#> edf Ref.df F p-value
#> s(x2):fac1 2.750 3.426 3.749 0.00763 **
#> s(x2):fac2 2.738 3.403 41.046 < 2e-16 ***
#> s(x2):fac3 7.140 8.195 35.734 < 2e-16 ***
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#>
#> R-sq.(adj) = 0.643 Deviance explained = 65.6%
#> GCV = 3.6879 Scale est. = 3.5438 n = 400
We can extract the predicted values with predict_gam()
.
The predicted values of the outcome variable are in the column
fit
, while fit.se
reports the standard error
of the predicted values.
model_p <- predict_gam(model)
model_p
#> # A tibble: 150 × 4
#> fac x2 fit se.fit
#> <fct> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 1 0.00134 1.02 0.546
#> 2 2 0.00134 -2.80 0.508
#> 3 3 0.00134 -1.70 0.801
#> 4 1 0.0217 1.04 0.487
#> 5 2 0.0217 -2.72 0.454
#> 6 3 0.0217 -0.616 0.612
#> 7 1 0.0421 1.06 0.435
#> 8 2 0.0421 -2.65 0.407
#> 9 3 0.0421 0.477 0.484
#> 10 1 0.0625 1.08 0.390
#> # ℹ 140 more rows
Now plotting can be done with ggplot2
. The convenience
function geom_smooth_ci()
can be used to plot the predicted
smooths with confidence intervals.
Now let’s plot a model that has a tensor product interaction term
(ti()
).
model_2 <- gam(
y ~
s(x2) +
s(f1) +
ti(x2, f1),
data = data
)
summary(model_2)
#>
#> Family: gaussian
#> Link function: identity
#>
#> Formula:
#> y ~ s(x2) + s(f1) + ti(x2, f1)
#>
#> Parametric coefficients:
#> Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
#> (Intercept) 1.4766 0.1527 9.67 <2e-16 ***
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#>
#> Approximate significance of smooth terms:
#> edf Ref.df F p-value
#> s(x2) 1.477 1.871 1.005 0.36103
#> s(f1) 1.000 1.000 1.279 0.25870
#> ti(x2,f1) 1.000 1.000 7.421 0.00673 **
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#>
#> R-sq.(adj) = 0.0662 Deviance explained = 7.43%
#> GCV = 9.3692 Scale est. = 9.2644 n = 400
Let’s get the prediction dataframe and produce a contour plot. We can
adjust labels and aesthetics using the usual ggplot2
methods.
model_2_p <- predict_gam(model_2)
model_2_p
#> # A tibble: 2,500 × 4
#> x2 f1 fit se.fit
#> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 0.00134 0.00125 -1.35 0.585
#> 2 0.0217 0.00125 -1.27 0.574
#> 3 0.0421 0.00125 -1.19 0.587
#> 4 0.0625 0.00125 -1.12 0.620
#> 5 0.0829 0.00125 -1.04 0.670
#> 6 0.103 0.00125 -0.962 0.729
#> 7 0.124 0.00125 -0.887 0.795
#> 8 0.144 0.00125 -0.813 0.864
#> 9 0.164 0.00125 -0.740 0.933
#> 10 0.185 0.00125 -0.668 1.00
#> # ℹ 2,490 more rows
To plot the smooths across a few values of a continuous predictor, we
can use the values
argument in
predict_gam()
.
It is possible to exclude terms when predicting values by means of
the exclude_terms
argument. This can be useful when there
are random effects, like in the following model.
data_re <- data %>%
mutate(rand = rep(letters[1:4], each = 100), rand = as.factor(rand))
model_3 <- gam(
y ~
s(x2) +
s(x2, rand, bs = "fs", m = 1),
data = data_re
)
#> Warning in gam.side(sm, X, tol = .Machine$double.eps^0.5): model has repeated
#> 1-d smooths of same variable.
summary(model_3)
#>
#> Family: gaussian
#> Link function: identity
#>
#> Formula:
#> y ~ s(x2) + s(x2, rand, bs = "fs", m = 1)
#>
#> Parametric coefficients:
#> Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
#> (Intercept) 1.5135 0.1839 8.23 2.85e-15 ***
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#>
#> Approximate significance of smooth terms:
#> edf Ref.df F p-value
#> s(x2) 4.222 5.143 4.473 0.000572 ***
#> s(x2,rand) 5.151 35.000 0.304 0.014734 *
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#>
#> R-sq.(adj) = 0.0919 Deviance explained = 11.3%
#> GCV = 9.2497 Scale est. = 9.0098 n = 400
exclude_terms
takes a character vector of term names, as
they appear in the output of summary()
(rather than as they
are specified in the model formula). For example, to remove the term
s(x2, fac, bs = "fs", m = 1)
, "s(x2,fac)"
should be used since this is how the summary output reports this term.
The output still contains the excluded columns. The predicted values of
the outcome variable are not affected by the value the excluded terms
(the predicted values are repeated for each value of the excluded
terms). In other words, the coefficients for the excluded terms are set
to 0 when predicting. We can filter the predicted dataset to get unique
predicted values by choosing any value or level of the excluded
terms.\footnote{Alternatively, we can use splice()
:
group_by(a) %>% splice(1)
. See
?splice
.}
predict_gam(model_3, exclude_terms = "s(x2,rand)") %>%
filter(rand == "a") %>%
ggplot(aes(x2, fit)) +
geom_smooth_ci()
To speed up the calculation of the predictions when excluding terms,
it is helpful to select a single value for the unnecessary terms using
the values
argument, rather than filtering with
filter()
. As with filter()
, any value of the
excluded variable can be used. If the value is NULL
, the
first value/level of the term is automatically selected (in the example
below, values = list(rand = NULL)
and
values = list(rand = "a")
would be equivalent).
predict_gam(model_3, exclude_terms = "s(x2,rand)", values = list(rand = NULL)) %>%
ggplot(aes(x2, fit)) +
geom_smooth_ci()
Of course, it is possible to plot the predicted values of random
effects if we wish to do so. In the following example, the random effect
rand
is not excluded when predicting, and it is used to
facet the plot.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.