CRAN Package Check Results for Maintainer ‘Dennis Walvoort <dennis.Walvoort at wur.nl>’

Last updated on 2025-01-30 16:48:47 CET.

Package	NOTE	OK
benthos	10	3
confidence	10	3
litteR	10	3
spcosa	10	3

Package benthos

Current CRAN status: NOTE: 10, OK: 3

Version: 1.3-8
Check: Rd files
Result: NOTE checkRd: (-1) hill.Rd:39: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup? 39 | \code{a} in {0, 1, 2} (see details))} | ^ checkRd: (-1) read_ambi.Rd:22: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) read_ambi.Rd:23-24: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) read_iti.Rd:39: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) read_iti.Rd:40: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) read_iti.Rd:41: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) read_iti.Rd:42: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) read_taxa.Rd:26: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) read_taxa.Rd:27: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) read_taxa.Rd:28: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) read_taxa.Rd:29: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) read_twn.Rd:36: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) read_twn.Rd:37: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) read_twn.Rd:38: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) read_twn.Rd:23: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly checkRd: (-1) read_twn.Rd:24: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly checkRd: (-1) read_twn.Rd:25: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly checkRd: (-1) read_twn.Rd:26: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-macos-arm64, r-release-macos-x86_64, r-release-windows-x86_64

Package confidence

Current CRAN status: NOTE: 10, OK: 3

Version: 1.1-2
Check: Rd files
Result: NOTE checkRd: (-1) mya.Rd:18: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly checkRd: (-1) mya.Rd:19: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly checkRd: (-1) mya.Rd:20: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly checkRd: (-1) mya.Rd:21: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly checkRd: (-1) mya.Rd:22: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-macos-arm64, r-release-macos-x86_64, r-release-windows-x86_64

Package litteR

Current CRAN status: NOTE: 10, OK: 3

Version: 1.0.0
Check: Rd files
Result: NOTE checkRd: (-1) is_natural_number.Rd:17: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup? 17 | Test for natural numbers according to ISO 80000-2, that is the set {0, 1, 2, ...} | ^ Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-macos-arm64, r-release-macos-x86_64, r-release-windows-x86_64

Version: 1.0.0
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE Found the following Rd file(s) with Rd \link{} targets missing package anchors: list_duplicates.Rd: tibble Please provide package anchors for all Rd \link{} targets not in the package itself and the base packages. Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64

Package spcosa

Current CRAN status: NOTE: 10, OK: 3

Version: 0.4-2
Check: Rd files
Result: NOTE checkRd: (-1) NEWS.Rd:137: Escaped LaTeX specials: \& Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-macos-arm64, r-release-macos-x86_64, r-release-windows-x86_64

Version: 0.4-2
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE Found the following Rd file(s) with Rd \link{} targets missing package anchors: CompactStratification-class.Rd: SpatialPixels-class, SpatialPoints-class, SpatialPixelsDataFrame-class CompactStratificationEqualArea-class.Rd: SpatialPixels-class, SpatialPoints-class CompactStratificationPriorPoints-class.Rd: SpatialPoints-class, SpatialPixels-class SamplingPattern-class.Rd: SpatialPoints-class SamplingPatternCentroids-class.Rd: SpatialPoints-class SamplingPatternPriorPoints-class.Rd: SpatialPoints-class SamplingPatternPurposive-class.Rd: SpatialPoints-class SamplingPatternRandom-class.Rd: SpatialPoints-class SamplingPatternRandomComposite-class.Rd: SpatialPoints-class, SpatialPointsDataFrame-class SamplingPatternRandomSamplingUnits-class.Rd: SpatialPoints-class stratify-methods.Rd: SpatialPixels-class, SpatialGrid-class, SpatialPolygons-class, SpatialPoints-class Please provide package anchors for all Rd \link{} targets not in the package itself and the base packages. Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64