The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
We implement an adaptation of Jiang & Zeng's (1995) <https://www.genetics.org/content/140/3/1111> likelihood ratio test for testing the null hypothesis of pleiotropy against the alternative hypothesis, two separate quantitative trait loci. The test differs from that in Jiang & Zeng (1995) <https://www.genetics.org/content/140/3/1111> and that in Tian et al. (2016) <doi:10.1534/genetics.115.183624> in that our test accommodates multiparental populations.
Version: | 1.4.3 |
Depends: | R (≥ 3.2) |
Imports: | dplyr, gemma2, ggplot2, magrittr, MASS, Rcpp, rlang, tibble, parallel |
LinkingTo: | Rcpp, RcppEigen |
Suggests: | covr, mvtnorm, knitr, rmarkdown, testthat, broman, devtools, qtl2, parallelly |
Published: | 2020-12-02 |
DOI: | 10.32614/CRAN.package.qtl2pleio |
Author: | Frederick J Boehm [aut, cre] |
Maintainer: | Frederick J Boehm <frederick.boehm at gmail.com> |
BugReports: | https://github.com/fboehm/qtl2pleio/issues |
License: | MIT + file LICENSE |
URL: | https://github.com/fboehm/qtl2pleio |
NeedsCompilation: | yes |
Language: | en-US |
Citation: | qtl2pleio citation info |
Materials: | README NEWS |
CRAN checks: | qtl2pleio results |
Reference manual: | qtl2pleio.pdf |
Vignettes: |
Using HTCondor for bootstrap analysis |
Package source: | qtl2pleio_1.4.3.tar.gz |
Windows binaries: | r-devel: qtl2pleio_1.4.3.zip, r-release: qtl2pleio_1.4.3.zip, r-oldrel: qtl2pleio_1.4.3.zip |
macOS binaries: | r-release (arm64): qtl2pleio_1.4.3.tgz, r-oldrel (arm64): qtl2pleio_1.4.3.tgz, r-release (x86_64): qtl2pleio_1.4.3.tgz, r-oldrel (x86_64): qtl2pleio_1.4.3.tgz |
Old sources: | qtl2pleio archive |
Please use the canonical form https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=qtl2pleio to link to this page.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.