The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by METANET, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]metanet.ch.
Leveraging (large) language models for automatic topic labeling. The main function converts a list of top terms into a label for each topic. Hence, it is complementary to any topic modeling package that produces a list of top terms for each topic. While human judgement is indispensable for topic validation (i.e., inspecting top terms and most representative documents), automatic topic labeling can be a valuable tool for researchers in various scenarios.
Version: | 0.2.0 |
Depends: | R (≥ 3.6.0) |
Imports: | checkmate (≥ 1.8.5), httr, progress, stats, jsonlite |
Suggests: | knitr, rmarkdown, testthat (≥ 3.0.0) |
Published: | 2024-10-21 |
DOI: | 10.32614/CRAN.package.topiclabels |
Author: | Jonas Rieger [aut, cre], Fritz Peters [aut], Andreas Fischer [aut], Tim Lauer [aut], André Bittermann [aut] |
Maintainer: | Jonas Rieger <rieger at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> |
BugReports: | https://github.com/PetersFritz/topiclabels/issues |
License: | GPL (≥ 3) |
URL: | https://github.com/PetersFritz/topiclabels |
NeedsCompilation: | no |
Citation: | topiclabels citation info |
Materials: | README |
CRAN checks: | topiclabels results |
Reference manual: | topiclabels.pdf |
Package source: | topiclabels_0.2.0.tar.gz |
Windows binaries: | r-devel: topiclabels_0.2.0.zip, r-release: topiclabels_0.2.0.zip, r-oldrel: topiclabels_0.2.0.zip |
macOS binaries: | r-release (arm64): topiclabels_0.2.0.tgz, r-oldrel (arm64): topiclabels_0.2.0.tgz, r-release (x86_64): topiclabels_0.2.0.tgz, r-oldrel (x86_64): topiclabels_0.2.0.tgz |
Old sources: | topiclabels archive |
Please use the canonical form https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=topiclabels to link to this page.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.